Are there papers on this? My experience with rapamycin has been… bad. I’ve been searching for information that might suggest that some people are hypersensitive but haven’t found much.
Based on my experience I can’t imagine taking more than 1mg per week, and yet most people take at least five times that.
I got my sirolimus from a big US pharmacy, but I’m going to look around here for a pill identification thread.
Not that I can tell.
I havent controlled the variables, so the confounding influence of afternoon coffee, late dinner, various supplements, makes any effects hard to determine.
I don’t think there’s any research re cons and pros of individual dosing yet. We are still at a very early stage of using Rapa. I’m very sensitive to medications in general, including Rapa, and usually need a much smaller dose than many people do. After trying different protocols, I came to a conclusion that it’s important for me to keep not less than 12 days, but ideally more, between doses. If I do that, I don’t have negative side effects. My primary goal is to support my transplanted kidney, so my experience may not work for those who take Rapa only for longevity.
I am curious why you say that your sleep quality isn’t what it should be. I believe they give you a little crown at a score of 85. My question is whether Oura provides a valid sleep analysis. I have been using the ring for just about a year now. I also purchased a
Fit bit at the same time as the Oura ring. What I know for sure is that data from the Oura and the Fitbit are not significantly related. I have graphs of the data for sleep quality, sleep time, deep sleep time, hrv, calories burned, etc. Except for sleep time, the R^2 correlation for all these are less than .05. Sleep time correlates better at about .65. Has anyone else conducted a similar analysis. I know that many times the sleep score from Oura does not mesh with how I feel.
Here is a typical comparison of sleep scores for Oura and Fitbit (recorded for the same night).
Interesting data… What we need is a comparison to polysomnography.
My bias, as an owner, is that Oura is more accurate that Fitbit. Certainly Matthew Walker wears one…
I learned from the Oura analysis that I was getting very low REM and Deep sleep, so I started experimenting with different supplements and different evening patterns.
After a lot of trial and error, my REM and Deep are now both regularly scoring at acceptable amounts. I feel better and more energetic during the day and will continue to experiment with variations. I havent paid much attention yet to the other sleep scores.
For tracking exercise I wouldnt recommend Oura. At this point my concern has been with sleep quality
Could you pls share what supplements you are taking for better sleep score?
I’ve had consistent improvement from a combination of 2 PureEncapsulation products: Best Rest (I take 1 instead of 2 caps) and Pure Tranquility (I take 2 dropper fulls instead of 4). These are fairly pricey. Note that each product by itself didnt get consistent benefits, but this combination has been working.
I’m also experimenting with glycine, taurine, and ashwaghanda and plan to try apigenin, but no consistent results to report yet.
The problem with using your ring to analyze your deep sleep is that the deep sleep evaluation may not be even remotely correct. Here is a comparison of the deep sleep values recorded by Oura and Fitbit. I believe I read that some Oura rings record low values of deep sleep so they have started a beta version which they provide for comparison each day. I find no correlation between the new deep sleep values and no correlation between the new deep sleep value and that of Fitbit.
Note the low R^2 (.016) value indicates almost no correlation between the two, so when my Oura says I got 5 mins of deep sleep my Fitbit has recorded as many as 110 minutes.
That discrepancy makes it difficult to actually know what action, if any, that I need to take to get better sleep. My take on all of this is that a random number generator would be just as useful. Even the trends do not agree. For instance, when one tracker reads a relatively high (or low) value the other has no tendency to do the same. I wish these were better but I believe the technology may have inherent limitations.
I must be missing something because if Oura is correct and Fitbit is incorrect, wouldnt we expect just the kind of correlation you have found?
I do think the Oura is over priced and for fitness tracking relatively worthless. Based on my n=1, though, I’m confident in its data and satisfied with how useful and consistent its been, including its Sleep Stage Beta version.
I have consistent effect from taurine. I take approx 1,5 gr if I wake up during the early part of the night. It makes it easier to go back to sleep.
I have tried 2-3 gr glycine right before going to bed, and I find that glycine works well on its own, but I get a stronger effect when I take Glycine together with apigenin (400-500 mg powder). I have many years experience from taurine. Glycine and apigenin are new to me, since 4–5 months.
Sorry, I did not mean to say that Fitbit is correct and that Oura is not, just that neither one provides any verifiable information regarding sleep details except for the amount of time slept. And, yes, this is the result one should expect from mutually inaccurate measurements. I think we have been sold these “fitness” trackers without solid peer reviewed evidence for their validity.
I agree that there isnt any overwhelming science to support the accuracy of the sleep stages.
I am swayed by the consistency of the sleep data when my personal variables are controlled, e.g. the supplements taken, time of last caffeine, the time of last meal and water intake. That’s admittedly a pretty low level of evidence. I’ll take what I can get until something better comes along.
in the recent tim ferris interview andrew huberman mentioned offhand that something like Sleep Eight (mattress cover) is more accurate with sleep stages than Oura because it can track body movement better. I have both and my oura always shows very low REM and high deep sleep. My Eight Sleep shows im getting much more REM. My take away is don’t put too much stock in the sleep phase readings.
I have experimented with captopril and it improves the sleep score on my Samsung watch
I trust my apple watch, of course it is not perfect, but here is a comparison test with EEG for 18 consecutive nights and it comes pretty close or close enough.
I must add that since starting rapamycin my sleep pattern improved and my deep sleep score went up 50% even if I do sleep less I feel more rested upon waking. My deep sleep was pretty consistent since I use apple watch to track my sleep and it was around 30 minutes, since starting rapamycin the average increased to 44 minutes. Before starting rapamycin getting to that number was really hard especially as I am a late sleeper and rarely go to bed before 1 or 2 AM…
