Prevent and cure cancer

New iron nanomaterial wipes out cancer cells without harming healthy tissue

Scientists at Oregon State University have engineered a powerful new nanomaterial that zeroes in on cancer cells and destroys them from the inside out. Designed to exploit cancer’s unique chemistry—its acidity and high hydrogen peroxide levels—the tiny iron-based structure sparks not one but two intense chemical reactions, flooding tumors with cell-damaging oxygen molecules. This dual attack overwhelms cancer cells with oxidative stress while sparing healthy tissue.

6 Likes

2 Likes

9 Surprising Foods that Cause Cancer

The following foods are explicitly implicated in the transcript as containing or facilitating the formation of carcinogens under specific conditions:

  • Peanuts: Risk of Aflatoxin B1 (fungal toxin) contamination, particularly in unregulated markets.
  • Corn (Maize): Similar risk of Aflatoxin contamination as seen in peanuts.
  • Pickled Vegetables: Linked to Stomach Cancer due to high sodium content (15% increased risk per 40g daily).
  • Salted Fish (e.g., Cod): Linked to Nasopharyngeal Cancer due to salt and preservation methods.
  • Miso: Identified as a high-sodium fermented food with potential gastric cancer links.
  • Red Wine & Liquor: Ethanol is a direct carcinogen with a linear risk relationship.
  • Coffee & Tea: Risk of Oral/Throat Cancer only if consumed at temperatures exceeding 65C , 149F.
  • Starchy Foods (e.g., French Fries, Toast): Risk of Acrylamide formation when cooked at high temperatures or burnt.
  • Muscle Meats (Poultry, Fish, Red Meat): Risk of HCAs and PAHs when grilled, charred, or exposed to open flames.
  • Spices (certain types): Noted as potential carriers of Aflatoxin contamination in some regions.

I. Executive Summary

The provided transcript outlines several dietary exposures and preparation methods linked to increased oncogenic risk, specifically targeting aflatoxins, high sodium intake, thermal injury, and pyrolysis products. The core thesis posits that “healthy” foods (e.g., peanuts, tea, fish, vegetables) can become significant vectors for carcinogenesis depending on storage conditions, processing (salting/pickling), and cooking temperatures.

A primary concern is Aflatoxin B1, a potent Group 1 carcinogen produced by Aspergillus species on peanuts and corn. While strictly regulated in the US, it remains a major driver of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) globally, particularly in individuals with comorbid Hepatitis B/C. The transcript further identifies high-sodium diets—specifically pickled vegetables and salted fish—as drivers of gastric and nasopharyngeal cancers through mucosal degradation and potentiation of H. pylori colonization.

Thermal factors are highlighted as dual-threats: physical and chemical. Physical injury from liquids $>65^\circ\text{C}$ is linked to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Chemically, high-heat cooking of carbohydrates (acrylamide) and animal proteins (Heterocyclic Amines [HCAs] and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAHs]) creates DNA-reactive metabolites. The speaker proposes mitigations such as acidic/antioxidant-rich marinades (rosemary, turmeric) and pre-cooking techniques to limit pyrolytic exposure.

While the transcript accurately reflects IARC classifications, it occasionally blurs the line between population-level epidemiological signals (e.g., pickled vegetables in East Asia) and individual risk in Western contexts. The “Actionable Intelligence” lies in the transition from what is eaten to how it is sourced, stored, and prepared.


II. Insight Bullets

  • Aflatoxin Potency: Aflatoxin B1 is a Group 1 human carcinogen; it is a primary driver of 5–28% of global liver cancer cases.
  • Synergistic Risk: Aflatoxin exposure combined with Hepatitis infection exponentially increases liver cancer risk compared to either factor alone.
  • Regulatory Buffer: US FDA testing makes aflatoxin contamination in major commercial peanut brands statistically unlikely; the risk is concentrated in unregulated or “natural” markets and developing regions.
  • Visual Screening: Shriveled, discolored, or moldy peanuts are high-risk indicators for fungal mycotoxins and should be discarded.
  • Sodium-Gastric Axis: Each 40g daily increment of pickled vegetables is associated with a 15% increase in stomach cancer risk.
  • Mucosal Vulnerability: Excess salt physically damages the gastric lining, facilitating H. pylori infection, a known precursor to gastric adenocarcinoma.
  • Thermal Threshold: Consuming beverages above $65^\circ\text{C}$ ($149^\circ\text{F}$) is classified as “probably carcinogenic” due to chronic epithelial thermal injury.
  • Ethanol Linearity: Alcohol lacks a “safe” threshold for cancer; the relationship between intake and oncogenic risk is essentially linear across multiple tissue types.
  • Acrylamide Formation: Asparagine and sugars in starchy foods react at high temperatures ($>120^\circ\text{C}$) to form acrylamide, a “probable” human carcinogen.
  • Pyrolysis Byproducts: Charring meat creates HCAs from protein/creatine reactions and PAHs from fat drippings reacting with flames/smoke.
  • Marinade Chemistry: Acidic marinades (vinegar/citrus) and antioxidant spices (rosemary/turmeric) can reduce HCA formation by up to 90%.
  • HCA Mitigation: Pre-cooking meat (microwave/oven) before a brief “finish” on the grill significantly reduces the time-temperature product required for HCA/PAH synthesis.
  • Lean Cut Advantage: Trimming visible fat reduces flame flare-ups, directly lowering the deposition of PAHs onto the food surface.
  • Miso Paradox: While fermented, the high sodium content in commercial miso may offset probiotic benefits regarding gastric cancer risk.
  • Physical Removal: Manually excising charred portions of meat is a low-tech but effective method to reduce PAH/HCA ingestion.

III. Adversarial Claims & Evidence Table

III. Adversarial Claims & Evidence Table

Claim from Video Speaker’s Evidence Scientific Reality (Current Data) Evidence Grade Verdict
Aflatoxin B1 is a potent human carcinogen. IARC Group 1 Classification. Confirmed. AFB1 forms DNA adducts at the 249th codon of the p53 gene, causing G$\rightarrow$T mutations. Attributable to ~17% of global HCC cases. PMC12643785 A Strong Support
Pickled veg. increase stomach cancer risk by 15% per 40g/day. Meta-analysis citations. Pooled Relative Risk (RR) of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07–1.23) per 40g daily increment. Effect is dose-dependent and linear. MDPI-Cancers A Strong Support
Salted fish is linked to nasopharyngeal cancer. Cited in Asian populations. Meta-analysis shows RR 1.45 for high intake. Salt and nitrosamines may reactivate Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). Lian et al., 2022 A Strong Support
Hot drinks ($>65^\circ\text{C}$) cause oral/throat cancer. Thermal epithelium damage. Observational data supports a $2.5\times$ risk for ESCC. However, 2025 Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies suggest no genetic causal link, implying confounding factors (e.g., alcohol/smoking). JTD-88601 A/B Plausible / Contested
Marinades (rosemary/turmeric) reduce carcinogen formation. Antioxidant inhibition. Turmeric/rosemary marinades reduce HCA formation by up to 69–88% in beef/chicken. PMC12589718 D Strong Support (Translational)
Acrylamide in burnt toast/fries is a cancer risk. “Plausible relationship.” Classified as “Probable” (Group 2A). Evidence in humans is inconsistent; primary data remains pre-clinical/animal models. D Speculative (Human)

IV. Actionable Protocol (Prioritized)

High Confidence Tier (Verified Level A/B)

  • Thermal Regulation: Allow all beverages (coffee/tea) to cool for $\ge 4$ minutes or until temperature is $<60^\circ\text{C}$ ($140^\circ\text{F}$) to prevent chronic thermal injury to the esophageal epithelium.
  • Sodium Management: Limit “salt-preserved” foods (salted fish, heavily pickled vegetables) to $<40\text{g}$ per day. Favor fresh or vinegar-pickled (non-fermented/low-salt) alternatives to protect gastric mucosa.
  • Sourcing Integrity: Stick to major commercial brands for peanuts and maize in regulated markets (e.g., US/EU) where FDA/EFSA monitoring for aflatoxins is standard. Discard any nuts showing signs of shriveling or discoloration.

Experimental Tier (Level C/D - High Safety Margin)

  • The “Antioxidant Shield”: Marinate muscle meats for at least 20 minutes in a solution containing Turmeric, Rosemary, and an acidic base (lemon juice/vinegar). This reduces HCA synthesis during subsequent high-heat cooking.
  • Pre-emptive Cooking: Use a microwave or oven to reach an internal temperature of $60\text{–}70^\circ\text{C}$ before finishing on a grill. This minimizes the duration of pyrolytic exposure.
  • Lean Selection: Prioritize lean cuts to reduce PAH-laden smoke from fat drippings.

Red Flag Zone (Safety Data Absent / High Risk)

  • Charred Tissue Consumption: Aggressively excise all black/charred portions of meat. These contain concentrated HCAs and PAHs with no known “safe” threshold for DNA damage.
  • Hepatitis + Aflatoxin Synergy: Individuals with chronic HBV/HCV must maintain near-zero tolerance for unregulated “natural” peanut or corn products due to the $30\text{–}60\times$ synergistic HCC risk.

V. Technical Mechanism Breakdown

  1. Aflatoxin B1 Metabolism & p53 Mutagenesis: AFB1 undergoes bioactivation by hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes (specifically CYP1A2 and CYP3A4) into AFB1-8,9-epoxide. This highly reactive electrophile forms covalent adducts with the N7 position of guanine. The most significant target is the p53 tumor suppressor gene at codon 249. This mutation inactivates the cell’s ability to trigger apoptosis in response to DNA damage, leading to clonal expansion of initiated hepatocytes.
  2. The Sodium-Gastric Axis: High concentrations of sodium chloride ($NaCl$) exert an osmotic effect that strips the protective mucus layer of the stomach. This exposure results in chronic superficial gastritis, increased epithelial cell proliferation (compensatory hyperplasia), and heightened sensitivity to carcinogens. Furthermore, the denuded lining facilitates the colonization of Helicobacter pylori, which induces chronic inflammation via the CagA/VacA pathways, eventually progressing to atrophic gastritis and adenocarcinoma.
  3. Pyrolytic Chemistry (HCAs and PAHs): * Heterocyclic Amines (HCAs): Formed via the Maillard reaction when amino acids, sugars, and creatine react at temperatures $>150^\circ\text{C}$. Compounds like PhIP and MeIQx are pro-carcinogens that require metabolic activation to form DNA-reactive nitrenium ions.
  • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Formed by the incomplete combustion (pyrolysis) of fats. When fat drips onto a heat source, PAHs (e.g., Benzo[a]pyrene) are aerosolized in smoke and deposited on the meat’s surface. These molecules act as ligands for the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR), triggering the expression of enzymes that further metabolize them into carcinogenic diol-epoxides.
  1. Thermal Epithelial Disruption: Chronic exposure to liquids $>65^\circ\text{C}$ causes repeated thermal injury and inflammatory regeneration. This chronic “wound-healing” state increases the rate of cellular turnover, raising the statistical probability of spontaneous mutations and decreasing the “barrier function” of the esophageal squamous epithelium, potentially making it more permeable to other carcinogens like acetaldehyde from alcohol or tobacco-specific nitrosamines.
3 Likes

Avoid cancer, avoid the “breaking bad” effect. (Or, give people better healthcare coverage and you lower the crime rate).

A cancer diagnosis can push people to crime

Even generous welfare states are not immune to a “Breaking Bad” effect

In “breaking bad” a mild-mannered chemistry teacher reinvents himself as a drug lord after learning he has terminal cancer. A new study suggests the television show’s plot is less outlandish than it seems. Researchers in Denmark and the Netherlands find that the likelihood of a cancer patient committing a crime is 14% higher in the decade following their diagnosis than the baseline rate among people yet to develop the disease.

A criminal history does not affect the pattern much. Instead, the strongest predictors of criminality are patients’ finances and their prognosis. Even in Denmark, where health care is free and welfare generous, cancer reduces earnings and raises the risk of unemployment. The increase in criminal activity is concentrated among financially vulnerable patients, such as people without partners or with little education (see chart 2). The researchers find that the risk of offending is higher in areas where municipal-level benefits are stingier, suggesting the trend could be starker in countries with thinner safety nets.

Read the full story: A cancer diagnosis can push people to crime (The Economist)

3 Likes

Some good news

2 Likes

What does everybody here think about use of drugs to prevent cancer? Somebody in the Ora Biomedical thread mentioned Desloratadine the other day, which got me to do some reading:

Desloratidine seems quite strongly associated with improved survival in several cancers, particularly breast cancer, melanoma

Users of desloratadine showed consistently improved survival (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.81, p < .001) regardless of patient age, menopausal status, estrogen receptor status, or tumor stage. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1769185)

Desloratadine use was associated with improved survival for all ten immunogenic tumor types studied (gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, breast, prostate, kidney, bladder cancer, melanoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma), but not for the six non-immunogenic ones (Improved survival in several cancers with use of H1-antihistamines desloratadine and loratadine - PubMed)

Of note, other antihistamines like Cetirizine did not have this association

And there’s a pretty comprehensive mouse study about liver cancer:

desloratadine, an antiallergic drug, can repress proliferation in HCC cell lines, cell-derived xenograft (CDX), patient-derived organoid (PDO) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models.
Blockade of NMT1 enzymatic activity inhibits N-myristoylation of VILIP3 protein and suppresses liver cancer progression | Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

And in the supplemental data of this paper (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acel.14334), looking at the UK biobank and drugs associated with all-cause mortality, Desloratidine has HR 0.811, 95% CI 0.670–0.982; p = 0.031955. Again, no similar effect for other antihistamines.

There doesn’t seem to be any sort of dementia signal associated with it (unlike 1st get antihistamines), but there is a small signal for weight gain and metabolic dysregulation (Association of prescription H1 antihistamine use with obesity: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey - PMC)

3 Likes

Probably a good idea to switch to this antihistamine.

1 Like

Trump has collapsed cancer research. —> The National Cancer Institute hasn’t made a single grant this fiscal year

Nationally, N.I.H. grants to universities are down by more than ninety per cent in the current fiscal year; during that time, the National Cancer Institute hasn’t made a single grant.

Full story: The Unmaking of the American University (New Yorker)

3 Likes

People REVERSED their Cancer by eliminating Glycine and Serine

I. Executive Summary

The analyzed transcript evaluates the complex, frequently paradoxical role of the non-essential amino acids serine and glycine in cancer progression, specifically through their integration into one-carbon metabolism. The core thesis posits that while early clinical interventions utilizing dual serine- and glycine-restricted diets show promise in limiting tumor proliferation, isolated biochemical data indicates that serine is the primary oncogenic driver. Pre-clinical models and in vitro assays demonstrate that serine restriction stunts neoplastic growth, whereas isolated glycine restriction yields negligible anti-tumor efficacy.

Crucially, the transcript identifies glycine as a metabolic “double agent.” Because the enzymatic conversion of serine to glycine via serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) is substrate-dependent and fully reversible, supraphysiological influxes of exogenous glycine force the pathway backward. This reverse reaction (glycine to serine) consumes, rather than donates, the critical one-carbon units required for nucleotide biosynthesis. Consequently, high intracellular glycine acts as a metabolic sink, starving the tumor of the nucleic acids necessary for DNA synthesis and genomic replication. While pre-clinical murine models suggest high-dose glycine supplementation limits tumor progression by exploiting this bottleneck, severe translational gaps remain. The aggressive leap from in vitro isotope tracing to human oncological protocols is premature, and additional large-scale, randomized human trials are mandatory to determine the safety and efficacy of targeted amino acid modulation in active malignancies.

II. Insight Bullets

  • Amino Acid Dependency: Malignant cells exhibit a profound reliance on specific non-essential amino acids, particularly serine, to fulfill the anabolic requirements of rapid proliferation and genomic replication.
  • One-Carbon Metabolism: Serine fuels the one-carbon metabolism network by donating a carbon atom during its conversion to glycine, an essential step for synthesizing DNA and RNA building blocks.
  • Dual Restriction Efficacy: Phase I clinical trials and early murine models indicate that simultaneously restricting dietary serine and glycine restricts tumor proliferation and modulates the tumor immune microenvironment.
  • The Serine Dominance: In vitro isolation reveals that serine restriction independently halts tumor proliferation, whereas isolating glycine restriction fails to impede cancer growth.
  • Pathway Reversibility: The enzymatic conversion between serine and glycine is a reversible biochemical reaction dictated entirely by cellular substrate concentrations.
  • The Glycine Paradox: Exposing cancer cells to high concentrations of exogenous glycine forces the reversible SHMT pathway backward, driving glycine to convert back into serine.
  • Carbon Depletion Sink: The reverse conversion of glycine to serine actively consumes one-carbon units instead of donating them, effectively collapsing the one-carbon metabolism cycle.
  • Nucleic Acid Starvation: The disruption of one-carbon metabolism severely limits the tumor cell’s ability to synthesize DNA, hindering replication, genome repair, and survival.
  • Pre-Clinical Glycine Efficacy: Murine models demonstrate that high-dose glycine supplementation paradoxically acts as an anti-tumorigenic agent by exploiting this metabolic vulnerability.
  • Translational Gap in Supplementation: The efficacy of oral glycine supplementation as an active anti-cancer intervention currently lacks robust human Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).
  • Prophylactic Safety: For individuals without an active malignancy, current data indicates that ongoing glycine supplementation is safe and potentially beneficial for broader metabolic health and lifespan extension.
  • Clinical Ambiguity: For active cancer patients, the data presents a contradictory risk profile (dietary restriction vs. high-dose supplementation), making isolated dietary self-medication highly hazardous without continuous biomarker tracking and oncological oversight.

III. Adversarial Claims & Evidence Table

Specific Claim What they cited Verified status + PubMed/DOI Link Evidence Grade (A-E) Verdict
Dual restriction of Serine/Glycine reverses cancer mass Phase I clinical trial data Verified. Early Phase I data (e.g., ChiCTR2300067929) shows -SG diets modulate systemic immunity and limit tumor proliferation. PMC12708301 Level C Plausible
Serine restriction inhibits tumor growth; glycine restriction does not In vitro (cell culture) assays Verified. Exogenous glycine cannot substitute for serine in driving proliferation because the reverse conversion consumes one-carbon units. PMC12708301 Level D Strong Support
High glycine reverses one-carbon metabolism, starving cancer of nucleic acids Isotope tracing in cell models Verified. Reversing the SHMT reaction drains 5,10-methylene-THF, acting as a one-carbon sink and starving the cell of nucleotides. PMC12708301 Level D Plausible
Glycine supplementation halts cancer progression Pre-clinical animal models Source unverified in live search for human RCTs. While animal models show suppressed tumor growth via metabolic trapping, translation to human oncology is clinically undocumented. Level D Translational Gap

IV. Actionable Protocol (Prioritized)

To translate these findings into a pragmatic longevity and health framework, we must separate healthy baseline metabolism from active tumor biology. Full Phase III RCT data is required before any of these interventions cross into standardized oncology.

High Confidence Tier (General Health & Longevity)

  • Prophylactic Glycine Supplementation: If you are healthy and possess no active malignancies, continuing to supplement with glycine is highly supported. It provides necessary substrates for glutathione (GSH) synthesis, promotes collagen repair, and supports general metabolic health without any verified oncogenic risks.

Experimental Tier (Active Malignancy)

  • Dual Dietary Restriction (-SG Diet): For patients with active malignancies, a strict serine and glycine-free diet is currently under Phase I investigation, often combined with immunotherapies (e.g., anti-PD-1). This requires total synthetic medical nutrition to starve the tumor of exogenous amino acids. Knowledge Gap: Efficacy heavily depends on the tumor’s genetic profile, as some cancers will aggressively upregulate de novo synthesis to survive.

Red Flag Zone (Avert)

  • High-Dose Glycine Supplementation for Cancer Treatment: Using high-dose glycine to intentionally “reverse” one-carbon metabolism and starve an active tumor is theoretically brilliant but clinically dangerous. Safety Data Absent. Tumors are highly heterogeneous; depending on whether a tumor has amplifications in the PHGDH gene, flooding the system with glycine could paradoxically fuel alternate compensatory survival pathways rather than starving the cell.

V. Technical Mechanism Breakdown

One-Carbon Metabolism & The Folate Cycle
Serine is the primary carbon donor for the cellular folate cycle. The enzyme Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT)—specifically SHMT1 in the cytosol and SHMT2 in the mitochondria—transfers a carbon atom from serine to tetrahydrofolate (THF). This reaction yields glycine and 5,10-methylene-THF. This newly minted one-carbon unit (5,10-methylene-THF) is then heavily utilized in the biosynthesis of purines and pyrimidines (thymidylate), which are the fundamental nucleic acids required for DNA replication in highly proliferative cancer cells.

Metabolic Trapping (The “Double Agent” Reversal)
The SHMT enzymatic reaction exists in a state of equilibrium and is entirely reversible based on mass action. In a controlled microenvironment where tumors are flooded with exogenous glycine (a high-glycine/low-serine ratio), the mass action ratio forces the SHMT enzyme to operate in reverse, converting glycine back into serine.

Crucially, this reverse reaction consumes 5,10-methylene-THF (the 1C unit) instead of producing it. By acting as a massive 1C “sink,” the excess glycine depletes the intracellular pool of available one-carbon units. This triggers a cascading failure: nucleotide biosynthesis halts, replication stress compounds, the cancer cell cannot repair its genomic damage, and tumor proliferation collapses.

The De Novo Serine Synthesis Pathway (SSP) Escape Mechanism
It is important to acknowledge a vital knowledge gap regarding dietary restriction alone: many aggressive tumors bypass dietary serine deprivation by upregulating the endogenous Serine Synthesis Pathway (SSP). They divert the glycolytic intermediate 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG) into endogenous serine production via the rate-limiting enzyme Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenase (PHGDH). Consequently, targeting cancer metabolism often requires a combinatorial approach: restricting exogenous intake while simultaneously utilizing pharmacological inhibitors of PHGDH to block the tumor’s internal synthesis escape route.


7 Likes

For liver cancer (HCC) Cyproheptadine (a 1st-Gen H1-antihistamine) also provides cancer protection. Like Desloratadine it results in weight gain, which is considered a plus for cancer patients that tend to lose weight due to loss of appetite.

Cyproheptadine is OTC in most countries outside the USA, and I ordered some, just in case, from India.

Looks like Desloratadine is prescription only in USA, but is OTC in other counties. Not sure if it is available in India.

1 Like

I don’t see how you go serine free. Your body can make it from glucose or glycine. All protein has got it, even vegetable protein. You pretty much have to be keto, meaning almost all fat, no sugar or starch, almost no protein. It may stop the cancer, but not a long term solution for any living thing.

2 Likes

Yes - its a specially formulated medical diet (not something you can easily choose in a grocery store):

In clinical trials and pre-clinical models, a -SG diet is achieved exclusively through elemental or synthetic medical diets Dietary Manipulation of Amino Acids for Cancer Therapy, 2023.

This involves stripping all natural, intact protein from the diet. Instead, patients consume a proprietary, lab-formulated powder containing the other 18 amino acids, strictly calibrated to contain zero serine and zero glycine. Biotech companies pioneering this space engineer highly processed, precision meals to make these synthetic amino acid profiles palatable and compliant for human oncology patients.

III. Protocol Translation: Example -SG Daily Meals

A patient enrolled in a -SG clinical trial consumes a heavily calculated, synthetic diet. A daily meal plan relies on zero-protein carbohydrate and fat sources acting as delivery vehicles for the synthetic amino acid blend.

  • Breakfast: The Elemental Shake
    • A liquid formula serving as the primary caloric and macronutrient base.
    • Composition: The -SG synthetic amino acid blend, emulsified with pure fats (e.g., refined coconut oil or MCT oil) and pure carbohydrates (e.g., maltodextrin). Flavored with zero-protein artificial extracts.
  • Lunch: Engineered Carbohydrate Matrix
    • Zero-protein starches used to mimic a traditional meal.
    • Composition: Noodles made from Konjac root (glucomannan) or pure cassava starch, served with a protein-free synthetic broth fortified with the -SG amino acid powder and essential micronutrients.
  • Dinner: Amino-Acid Modulated “Meals”
    • Food scientists physically reconstruct the texture of food using pure macronutrient isolates.
    • Composition: An amino-acid-modulated synthetic “dahl” or porridge. This relies on zero-protein binders, specific isolated lipids, and the precise -SG amino acid powder, often microwaved and served with a zero-protein fat source (like a synthetic, dairy-free yogurt substitute).
  • Snacks & Hydration:
    • Filtered water, black coffee, or zero-calorie/zero-protein clear fluids. No natural snacking (no nuts, fruits, or vegetables) is permitted, as trace amounts of natural proteins instantly break the -SG restriction.
4 Likes

Full story here:

Tech boss uses AI and ChatGPT to create cancer vaccine for his dying dog

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/tech-boss-uses-ai-and-chatgpt-to-create-cancer-vaccine-for-his-dying-dog/news-story/292a21bcbe93efa17810bfcfcdfadbf7

7 Likes

AlphaFold is an AI system developed by Google DeepMind that predicts a protein’s 3D structure from its amino acid sequence. It effectively solved a 50-year-old “grand challenge” in biology by achieving accuracy competitive with expensive, year-long experimental methods.

Key Versions & Milestones

  • AlphaFold 2 (2020): The breakthrough version that demonstrated “stunningly accurate” 3D models. Its developers, Demis Hassabis and John Jumper, were co-awarded the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this achievement.
  • AlphaFold 3 (2024): The latest model, which expands capabilities beyond proteins to predict the structures and interactions of DNA, RNA, ligands, and ions.
  • AlphaFold Database: A massive, free repository created with EMBL-EBI containing over 200 million protein structure predictions—covering nearly all cataloged proteins known to science.

How to Access It

  • AlphaFold Server: A free, web-based tool for non-commercial research to generate predictions using AlphaFold 3.
  • AlphaFold Database: A searchable platform to look up and download existing protein structure predictions.
  • Google Cloud & Vertex AI: For high-throughput research, AlphaFold is available via Vertex AI Pipelines and the AlphaFold Portal.
  • Open Source: The code and parameters for AlphaFold 2 are available on GitHub.

Real-World Impact

AlphaFold is used by over 3 million researchers worldwide to accelerate work in:

[image]Google DeepMind +2

  • Drug Discovery: Identifying new drug targets and understanding how medicines bind to them.
  • Disease Research: Studying antimicrobial resistance and rare genetic diseases.
  • Sustainability: Developing more disease-resistant crops and improving honeybee immunity.
    Alphafold
3 Likes

source: https://x.com/patrickc/status/2033226013128511512?s=20

4 Likes

This story from the Australian has created a stir on twitter today. It reminded me of the Joan Manick video where she mentions discovering a cure for a type of lymphoma. She describes the results of Everolimus and another molecule and then mentions that Everolimus was going off patent. I wonder how many lives might be saved if certain treatments could be made profitable

3 Likes

I. Executive Summary

The provided transcript details a presentation by Dr. Joan Mannick regarding Tornado Therapeutics’ development of next-generation rapalogs (mTOR inhibitors). The core thesis posits that while first-generation rapalogs (e.g., rapamycin, everolimus) are the most robustly validated pharmacological interventions for lifespan extension in model organisms, their clinical utility in geroscience is severely limited by an expiration of intellectual property and dose-limiting metabolic and hematologic toxicities.

The speaker attributes these side effects—specifically hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, and thrombocytopenia—to the “off-target” inhibition of the mTOR Complex 2 (TORC2). First-generation rapalogs potently inhibit mTOR Complex 1 (TORC1), which drives the longevity phenotype, but they also induce partial TORC2 inhibition under chronic dosing. Tornado Therapeutics asserts they have acquired an orphaned portfolio of highly selective, patent-protected TORC1 inhibitors from Novartis.

The company’s lead candidate, TOR101, demonstrates preclinical superiority by achieving sub-nanomolar TORC1 inhibition with zero detectable TORC2 inhibition up to 300 nM. Preliminary toxicology in rats and non-human primates suggests this selectivity effectively bypasses the lipid and platelet abnormalities endemic to everolimus. To de-risk clinical development, Tornado is targeting two indications with established precedent: oncology (Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, paired with R-CHOP) and immunosenescence (specifically, augmenting interferon-driven antiviral immunity against respiratory pathogens in the elderly).

While the pharmacological rationale for highly selective TORC1 inhibitors is biologically sound, the presentation functions primarily as an investor pitch. It selectively highlights small, successful trials (e.g., a 35-patient nursing home COVID-19 study) while conspicuously omitting the historical failures of similar compounds (like RTB101) in large-scale Phase 3 trials for respiratory tract infections. The pursuit of TORC1 selectivity is the correct evolutionary step for gerotherapeutics, but the translational gap between rodent toxicology and human geriatric efficacy remains formidable.


II. Insight Bullets

  • mTOR’s Binary Function: The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions as a metabolic switch; nutrient abundance activates it (driving growth/reproduction), while fasting inhibits it (upregulating autophagy, repair, and stress resistance).
  • Age-Related mTOR Hyperfunction: Preclinical data indicates that aging blunts the circadian oscillation of mTOR. In older mice, hepatic mTOR fails to downregulate during fasting, remaining persistently active.
  • The TORC1 vs. TORC2 Dichotomy: mTOR operates in two distinct multi-protein complexes. TORC1 inhibition is responsible for lifespan extension; TORC2 inhibition decreases lifespan and induces metabolic dysfunction.
  • First-Generation Flaws: Rapamycin and everolimus are imperfect geromodulators because chronic high dosing inevitably leads to partial TORC2 inhibition, triggering hypertriglyceridemia and immunosuppression.
  • TOR101 Selectivity: Tornado’s lead asset, TOR101, exhibits high allosteric specificity, completely isolating TORC1 inhibition from TORC2 up to a 1,000-fold concentration differential in vitro.
  • Toxicology Differentiation: 14-day and early 28-day in vivo rat models show TOR101 avoids the dose-limiting thrombocytopenia and hypercholesterolemia triggered by everolimus at comparable or lower exposures.
  • Oncology Application: Adding everolimus to R-CHOP chemotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) previously yielded near-100% overall survival in small trials; TOR101 aims to replicate this without the hematologic toxicity that previously halted Phase 3 development.
  • Immunosenescence Target: Aging degrades interferon-induced antiviral immunity. Low-dose mTOR inhibition consistently upregulates this specific immune cascade in older adults.
  • Pathogen-Agnostic Defense: Rather than utilizing “one bug, one drug” antivirals (which invite escape mutations), geromodulators attempt to correct the host’s underlying immune deficit, offering broad-spectrum respiratory protection.
  • Age Stratification of Efficacy: Prior clinical data suggests mTOR-mediated immune rejuvenation provides the highest statistical benefit to populations aged ≥75, implying individuals aged 65–74 may retain sufficient baseline antiviral function.
  • Fasting in the Elderly: It is currently unknown if intermittent fasting successfully inhibits mTOR in healthy human adults over the age of 75, presenting a significant gap in non-pharmacological longevity protocols.

III. Adversarial Claims & Evidence Table

Claim from Video Speaker’s Evidence Scientific Reality (Current Data) Evidence Grade Verdict
Aging causes mTOR to ignore fasting signals. Sabatini Lab (Nature). Verified. Pusapati et al., 2020 and others demonstrate age-related loss of nutrient-sensing fidelity in mTORC1 signaling. Level D (Pre-clinical) Strong Support
TORC2 inhibition causes hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, and shortens lifespan. Lamming et al. studies. Verified. Lamming et al., 2012 definitively proved chronic rapamycin induces hepatic insulin resistance via TORC2 disruption. Level D (Pre-clinical) Strong Support
Everolimus + R-CHOP yields ~100% OS in DLBCL. Mayo Clinic data. Contextualized. A Phase 1/2 trial by Witzig et al. (2018) showed an impressive 96% overall survival at 24 months, but in a highly selected, small patient cohort (n=24). Level C Plausible (Needs Phase 3)
mTOR inhibitors completely prevented severe COVID-19 in a nursing home trial. Internal 35-person trial data (18 treated, 17 placebo). Highly Debated. While the specific small trial may have shown these results, the speaker’s previous mTOR inhibitor (RTB101) failed a massive Phase 3 trial for respiratory illness prevention in the elderly, leading to company dissolution. Level B/C (Conflicting) Speculative (Survivorship Bias)
TOR101 causes zero toxicity up to 250 mg/kg. 14-day rat/NHP tox studies. Translational Gap. 14-day GLP tox is insufficient to declare chronic safety in humans. Toxicity often manifests during 28-day or 90-day chronic dosing. Level D (Pre-clinical) Speculative

IV. Actionable Protocol (Prioritized)

High Confidence Tier

  • None currently exist for pharmaceutical mTOR inhibition. Next-generation selective TORC1 inhibitors are purely investigational.
  • Protein/Nutrient Cycling: For individuals under 65, utilizing intermittent fasting or strategic protein restriction (methionine/leucine limitation) remains the most validated non-pharmacological method to temporarily suppress TORC1 and trigger autophagy.

Experimental Tier

  • Intermittent Rapamycin Dosing: For those aggressively pursuing longevity under physician supervision, weekly or bi-weekly dosing of standard rapamycin (e.g., 5-6mg once per week) is currently utilized off-label. This pulse-dosing strategy attempts to mimic selective TORC1 inhibition by clearing the drug before it can sufficiently suppress TORC2.

Red Flag Zone

  • Daily Rapamycin/Everolimus for Longevity: Daily, continuous dosing of first-generation rapalogs will inevitably inhibit TORC2, leading to insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and immune suppression.
  • Fasting for the Extreme Elderly: As highlighted by the speaker’s knowledge gap, extreme fasting protocols in adults >75 years old may fail to meaningfully inhibit mTOR while actively accelerating dangerous sarcopenia and frailty.

V. Technical Mechanism Breakdown

mTORC1 (Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1)
mTORC1 is a serine/threonine kinase complex defined by its association with the scaffolding protein Raptor. It acts as the master regulator of cellular metabolism, integrating signals from insulin, growth factors, amino acids (specifically leucine and arginine), and cellular energy status (AMPK). When activated, TORC1 phosphorylates S6K1 and 4E-BP1, driving mRNA translation, ribosome biogenesis, and lipid synthesis, while concurrently inhibiting ULK1 to shut down macroautophagy. Selective inhibition of TORC1 is the ultimate target of longevity therapeutics, as it initiates cellular cleanup without disrupting basal metabolic homeostasis.

mTORC2 (Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2)
mTORC2 is defined by its association with the protein Rictor. Unlike TORC1, TORC2 is relatively insensitive to nutrient availability and primarily responds to growth factor signaling (like insulin via PI3K). Its primary downstream target is the activation of Akt (Protein Kinase B) at Serine 473. Akt activation is essential for insulin signaling, glucose uptake, and cell survival.

The Pharmacodynamics of Rapalogs
Rapamycin does not inhibit the active kinase site of mTOR directly. Instead, it operates allosterically. It enters the cell and binds to the immunophilin FKBP12. This Rapamycin-FKBP12 complex then physically binds to the FRB domain of mTOR.

  • Acute exposure: The complex easily binds to mTORC1, immediately suppressing its activity. The Rictor protein in mTORC2 structurally blocks the Rapamycin-FKBP12 complex from binding, making TORC2 acutely resistant to the drug.
  • Chronic exposure: Prolonged presence of the drug sequesters the cellular pool of newly synthesized mTOR molecules, preventing them from assembling into new mTORC2 complexes. This indirect depletion is what drives the dangerous metabolic toxicities of first-generation rapalogs. True “Next-Gen” rapalogs like TOR101 are engineered to possess a structural geometry that entirely prevents interference with mTORC2 assembly, regardless of exposure duration.

1 Like

The summary skipped over the part I found interesting. The two drug combination boosted survival to 100%. Joan then mentions that Everolimus is going off patent so the search is on for a patentable rapalogue. The cost of a clinical trial is astronomical, so many known cures like this are not followed up.

3 Likes

This is a place where billionaires and philanthropists could make a huge difference, if they had the will.

It’s definitely a problem that once something is off-patent and/or no longer exclusive, it becomes essentially worthless to investigate it further.

3 Likes

Interesting news item from November of last year:

Extreme age protects against cancer in Stanford University mouse study

Old laboratory mice develop substantially fewer and less-aggressive lung tumors than younger animals in a new study led by Stanford University researchers. The discovery flies in the face of established dogma that holds that cancer risk increases with age, but it dovetails with what’s seen in very elderly people, in whom cancer risk appears to either level off or even decline with age.

However, maybe very old mice die from other kinds of cancer at a faster rate. So, depending on the age of the mouse, different types of interventions might be needed to reduce the chance they get cancer – one intervention might work best when the mouse is middle-age, but utterly fail to prevent cancer in old age.

1 Like