Macrophage Rejuvenation Reverses Organ Aging

Long-lived macrophages that sit permanently inside the liver, heart, lungs, brain and spleen are responsible for eating dying cells, and their busiest job is clearing worn-out neutrophils, the white blood cells the body produces by the hundreds of billions each day. This Stanford-led group shows that with age these resident macrophages accumulate a receptor called EP2, which responds to the lipid signal prostaglandin E2 and acts as a brake on their metabolism and their ability to grab and swallow cargo. Switching EP2 off in resident macrophages only, starting in mid-life, kept old mice’s mitochondria healthy, prevented the buildup of stressed senescent neutrophils across organs, and left 23 to 25 month old animals with better memory, more muscle, less abdominal fat, lower frailty scores, near-youthful heart function and almost no cardiac scarring. An experimental EP2-blocking drug given to 22 month old mice for two months restored the clearance defect, most strongly in liver. Human liver and heart data show the same receptor rising in aged resident macrophages, but no lifespan was measured and no female mice were studied.

This paper makes an argument that organs may age partly because the cleanup crew stops working, and the crew stops working because a single receptor gets stuck in the on position.

The crew in question is the tissue-resident macrophage. These cells arrive before birth, settle into the liver, heart, lungs, brain, spleen and bone, and stay for the life of the animal, renewing themselves in place. They make up 60 to 90 percent of macrophages in major organs. Their day job is efferocytosis, the engulfment of dying cells, and by volume their main customer is the neutrophil. Humans make more than 100 billion a day and each survives 8 to 12 hours in circulation. If they are not removed on schedule they spill proteases and throw out sticky webs of DNA that injure surrounding tissue.

The Stanford group, with collaborators in MĂĽnster, deleted the prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 selectively in resident macrophages of middle-aged mice, then aged the animals to 23 to 25 months. The results across organs were consistent. Resident macrophage numbers held up instead of collapsing. Their mitochondria kept normal mass and voltage instead of losing roughly 60 percent of both, and stopped leaking superoxide. Inflammatory signals in blood, liver, colon, kidney, heart and hippocampus stayed closer to young patterns, and circulating endotoxin, a marker of gut barrier leak, fell by about 70 percent.

Function followed. Old animals without macrophage EP2 learned the Barnes maze faster, recognized novel objects, gripped harder, had more limb muscle and less visceral fat, scored lower on frailty, and had hearts that pumped and thickened like young hearts, with cardiac scar tissue at youthful levels.

The mechanistic payoff is the specificity. Aged macrophages could still recognize dying cells but failed at the next step: locking integrin adhesion molecules into their high-affinity shape to hold cargo while the membrane closes around it. The coactivators required for that lock were suppressed with age and restored by EP2 deletion. Senescent neutrophils, which lean hardest on that step, were the substrate that suffered most.

Then the practical test. Old mice, already 22 months, received an EP2-blocking compound by mouth for two months. Senescent-type neutrophils in blood, spleen and bone marrow fell toward young values, and liver macrophages regained most of their eating capacity. Liver responded best, likely because it sees the highest drug concentration.

Human tissue is consistent rather than confirmatory. In published single-cell datasets of aged and diseased human liver and aged human heart, resident macrophages decline, the EP2 gene rises in them, and neutrophils expand. Large genetic studies of human longevity show no signal at that gene, which the authors read as a limitation of those studies rather than evidence against the mechanism.

One design point deserves emphasis before anyone reaches for a conclusion about people. The organ and behavioral benefits came from switching the receptor off in middle age and waiting, which is prevention. The drug arm, started in old age, restored the cleanup machinery but was never tested on memory, strength, frailty or heart function. Whether late treatment recovers function, in both sexes, is the experiment that has not been run.

Actionable Insights

For individuals seeking practical interventions to improve healthspan, this study highlights the prostaglandin E2 pathway as a major target for mitigating systemic inflammation. While the highly specific EP2 antagonist drug used in the study (PF-04418948) is currently limited to laboratory research, the findings validate the broader strategy of managing cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and downstream prostaglandin E2 production to maintain immune clearance. Over-the-counter NSAIDs inhibit COX-2, but they carry well-documented gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks that preclude them as chronic longevity therapeutics. A more practical takeaway is the importance of minimizing chronic systemic inflammation that drives prostaglandin E2 elevation in the first place.

New drugs that target PGE2 are currently in development and testing, and if the results are positive, we might see a drug on the market in the next 3 to 5 years.

What the magnitudes look like: in the drug arm, two months of treatment in 22 month old mice cut senescent-type blood neutrophils from about 46 percent to about 11 percent of neutrophils, a 76 percent reduction, and restored liver macrophage engulfment from about 10 percent to 48 percent, against 53 percent in young mice. In the genetic prevention model, frailty fell about 63 percent, grip strength rose about 33 percent, muscle volume rose 38 percent, visceral fat fell 58 percent and cardiac scarring fell 72 percent.

Cheap human proxies worth tracking, because this biology predicts them, are hs-CRP, ALT, AST, GGT, ALP and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. In these mice, CRP dropped 74 percent and ALT 65 percent.

Context and Source

Related Reading:

3 Likes

Rapamycin therapy causes neutropenia. How does it affect the macrophages? Could mild rapamycin induced neutropenia be beneficial?

1 Like

On a semi related note, it turns out you can reprogram your old macrophages via PEMF and have them fight cancer… Somewhat relatedly, some people report health benefits by sleeping on a pemf pad.

Magnetic pulses reprogram immune cells to fight breast cancer in preclinical models https://share.google/ifaRvLClsfMmm9U3g

4 Likes

This is a fascinating area of investigation. Is anyone experimenting with interventions?

That’s interesting.
When taking Rapa my neutrophils drop dramatically. I guess that’s beneficial for me as there will be a lot less dead ones to clear out.

2 Likes

My neutrophils dropped as soon as I started a SGLT-2 inhibitor. Will see if they rebound next month.

image_d271685d-66ba-4df0-9ef9-9dfa3796f28f

1 Like

That is the effect of rapamycin on the immune system.

My neutrophils dropped from 1.4 to 0.8 as a result of my last dose of rapamycin (weekly tests) and the lab phoned up stressing out.

I don’t think this is anything positive it is just the normal effect of rapamycin.

Obviously as I have a 42 day cycle the figure will shift back up to what for me is normal (which is low for most other people).

1 Like

So referring back to the original post about macrophages not taking the trash (used up neutrophils) out, do you think this bit of research and conclusion is completely wrong?
Why do you think low or lower neutrophils is not positive in this respect?

1 Like

I am not referring to the original post. I am referring to the short term effects of mTOR inhibition.

I had read that SGLT2 inhibitors attenuate neutrophil activation and reduce neutrophil-mediated endothelial injury by downregulating GREM1 expression and restoring TGF-β/Smad signaling (whatever that means). Apparently, they reduce the inflammatory activity and cytotoxicity of neutrophils. I will get the results of my annual large test battery next week (Quest is very slow) and will have a better idea.

2 Likes

EP2 (PTGER2) Blocking Drugs: Who Is Actually Developing Them

Landscape scan, verified 16 September 2026

Headline finding: three EP2-blocking compounds are in human trials right now, and none of them is EP2-selective. All three are multi-receptor antagonists developed for oncology (two dual EP2/EP4, one triple EP2/EP4/DP1). The only EP2-selective compound ever dosed in humans, Pfizer’s PF-04418948, was dropped in 2010. Every EP2-selective program today is preclinical, and the one aimed at chronic neuroinflammation (Emory) is in IND-enabling work funded by the National Institute on Aging. [Confidence: High on the compound census, Medium on private-company status where only secondary sources exist]


1. In the clinic now

Epkin, an affiliate of Owkin (France and US), compound OKN4395

  • Mechanism: oral triple antagonist of EP2, EP4 and DP1. Reported potency EP2 8.1 nM, EP4 26.6 nM, DP1 11.4 nM
  • Origin: discovered at Idorsia as ACT-1002-4391, in-licensed by Owkin in 2024
  • Trial: INVOKE, protocol OKN-4395-121, Phase 1a/1b, first in human, advanced solid tumors, monotherapy and with pembrolizumab. Expansion cohorts in sarcoma, NSCLC, colorectal and gastric cancer
  • Status: recruiting. Start 23 January 2025, 146 patients planned, 10 sites in the US, UK and Australia, record last updated 11 June 2026. Primary completion estimated July 2028. No efficacy or safety data disclosed yet
  • June 2026: clinical supply agreement with BeOne Medicines to add a tislelizumab combination arm
  • Links: Epkin | Owkin pipeline page | NCT06789172 | first patient dosed release | preprint on the compound

Oscotec (South Korea), compound OCT-598, also called KNP-502

  • Mechanism: oral dual EP2/EP4 antagonist
  • Origin: discovered by Kanaph Therapeutics with the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, as KT-00113, then licensed to Oscotec
  • Trial: Phase 1 dose escalation, safety, PK and efficacy, as monotherapy and with docetaxel in advanced solid tumors. 51 patients planned, start 18 December 2025, three Korean sites (National Cancer Center, Seoul National University Bundang, Asan Medical Center), primary completion estimated December 2027
  • Status: recruiting, record last updated 22 January 2026
  • Links: NCT07358806 | Oscotec OCT-598 program page | Oscotec pipeline | Kanaph Therapeutics | AACR 2023 preclinical abstract | Oscotec licensing report

Tempest Therapeutics (US), compound TPST-1495, deprioritized by the company but still in trials

  • Mechanism: oral dual EP2/EP4 antagonist
  • Phase 1 completed 25 September 2024, 89 patients, monotherapy and with pembrolizumab. Recommended dose 50 mg once daily. Twice-daily dosing was abandoned for tolerability (grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events 45 percent, versus 5 percent on once daily). Two partial responses, both in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer. No results posted to the registry
  • Phase 2 in familial adenomatous polyposis is sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, not Tempest, with orphan drug designation granted in 2025. Registry status as of the 8 July 2026 update is suspended, reason given as “new information received,” start date still listed as estimated, which means no patient had been dosed. One tracking service and the NCI prevention site show it back to recruiting in September 2026, which I could not confirm in the registry itself [Confidence: Low on the current status of this trial]
  • Investigator-initiated Phase 2 window-of-opportunity trial at the University of Oklahoma, 50 mg daily for 7 days before surgery in endometrial or colorectal cancer, is active but not recruiting
  • Company context that matters: Tempest announced a strategic alternatives review in April 2025, acquired CAR-T assets in February 2026 and pivoted, reported 0.8 million dollars cash at 30 June 2026 with going-concern language, and raised up to 7.5 million dollars in September 2026. TPST-1495 appears on the pipeline page only as a footnote to the NCI trial
  • Links: Tempest EP2/EP4 program page | pipeline | Phase 1 NCT04344795 | ASCO 2023 Phase 1 abstract | NCI Phase 2 NCT06557733 | NCI prevention listing | Oklahoma Phase 2 NCT06129604 | mechanism paper, Cancer Res Commun 2023

2. Preclinical and IND-enabling, EP2-selective

Emory University and Pyrefin Inc. (US), the deepest EP2-selective program

  • People: Thota Ganesh (medicinal chemistry), Raymond Dingledine, with Nicholas Varvel and others
  • Compounds: TG4-155, TG6-10-1, TG8-260, TG11-77, and the current lead BPN-37440, which carries the prefix of the NIH Blueprint Neurotherapeutics Network. TG6-129 is a dual EP2/EP4 tool compound
  • Stage: lead optimization moving into IND-enabling toxicology and PK. Funded in part by NIA grant U01AG088113, roughly 1.87 million dollars to Thota Ganesh and Tage Honore, running to about mid-2029, explicitly to support an IND filing for Alzheimer’s disease
  • Indications: status epilepticus and post-seizure cognitive deficit, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, ischemic stroke, neuroinflammation
  • Company: Pyrefin Inc., Atlanta, founded around late 2019, has licensed the Emory EP2 technology. Dennis McNamara chief executive, Dingledine chair, Ganesh founder and equity holder. I could not find a website for Pyrefin, only third-party records, and no funding announced since Georgia Research Alliance support [Confidence: Medium on Pyrefin’s current activity]
  • Links: Ganesh EP2 SWOT review, J Med Chem 2023 (free full text) | BPN-37440 paper, J Med Chem 2026 | NIA grant coverage | Ganesh patent list | Pyrefin, Georgia Research Alliance profile | Dingledine on founding Pyrefin | Dingledine lab

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Jianxiong Jiang lab (US)

  • Jiang trained in the Dingledine lab and is a co-inventor on the Emory EP2 patents. His own series is newer and more potent
  • Compounds: CJ-18, CJ-19, CJ-21, with reported potencies of 5.0, 4.5 and 0.8 nM, designed to improve on TG11-77’s metabolic stability
  • Stage: discovery and lead optimization. Indications: ischemic stroke, neuroinflammation, seizures. NIH funding R01NS100947, R21NS136070, R61NS130199. No company identified
  • Links: Jiang lab | CJ-series paper, Bioorg Med Chem 2026 | lab patents page

Stanford University and Willow Neuroscience Inc. (US), the group behind the Science paper

  • Katrin Andreasson, corresponding author of the 2026 Science paper on macrophage EP2 and organ aging, is a cofounder of Willow Neuroscience Inc.
  • Confirmed EP2 link: an Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation grant to Willow Neuroscience titled “Development of EP2 receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease,” principal investigator Michael Venuti, stage lead optimization, term running to 2016. Goal stated as a selective brain-penetrant first-in-human EP2 inhibitor
  • Stanford patent application US 20220048987, inventors Andreasson and Paras Minhas, priority August 2020, claims inhibiting EP2 signaling to prevent or reverse age-associated inflammation, cognitive decline and neurodegeneration, naming PF-04418948 and C52 as examples. This is the only aging-specific EP2 intellectual property I found
  • Funding: SEC Form D filings total about 2.07 million dollars, most of it in January 2022
  • Uncertainty: I could not reach willowneuroscience.com from this environment, and the only current third-party description of the company refers to neuro-immunotherapies and PET tracers without mentioning EP2. Whether EP2 is still the program, and whether Stanford licensed the aging patent to Willow or anyone, is unresolved. Note also that the Nature 2021 paper from this group declared no competing interests, while the 2026 Science paper discloses the Willow cofounder role [Confidence: Low on Willow’s current pipeline, High that the EP2 program existed]
  • Links: ADDF grant record | US 20220048987 | Willow SEC filings | Andreasson Stanford profile | Minhas et al., Nature 2021 | company site, unverified

Ono Pharmaceutical (Japan), patent-stage

  • Holds a granted EP2 antagonist composition-of-matter patent, EP3992176, priority June 2019, granted August 2025, with claims covering endometriosis, fibroids, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, cancer, inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and several neurodegenerative diseases
  • A separate filing, WO2022138792, claims salts and crystal forms of one specific cyclopropane carboxylic acid compound, which usually signals that a development candidate has been selected
  • No ONO code number, pipeline entry or trial for an EP2 antagonist is public. Ono’s disclosed clinical prostanoid asset is the EP4-only ONO-4578 [Confidence: Medium that this program is live, High that it is not yet in the clinic publicly]
  • Links: EP3992176 | WO2022138792, crystal forms | Ono development pipeline

East China Normal University (China)

Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica and ShanghaiTech (China), enabling structural biology rather than a drug program

  • H. Eric Xu and Canrong Wu published cryo-EM structures of EP2 bound to PF-04418948 and of EP2 and EP4 bound to the dual antagonist TG6-129, defining the selectivity pockets for structure-based design
  • Link: EMBO J 2025
1 Like

15-PGDH (HPGD) Inhibitors: Who Is Developing Them

Landscape scan, verified 16 September 2026

Direction check first, because it matters for how this fits with the EP2 work. 15-PGDH is the enzyme that degrades prostaglandin E2. Inhibiting it raises PGE2. That is the opposite intervention to the EP2 antagonists covered in the previous scan, which block PGE2 signaling. Two Stanford labs published the founding papers of both camps within six weeks of each other in the winter of 2020 to 2021, both framed as aging reversal. Nobody has reconciled them. Section 5 covers that directly.

Status of the field: two 15-PGDH inhibitors have completed Phase 1 in healthy volunteers, both first dosed after December 2024. One antibody program is heading to IND. Everything else is preclinical, patent-stage, or academic. [Confidence: High]


1. In the clinic

Epirium Bio (San Diego), compound MF-300, the lead program worldwide

  • Mechanism: oral small molecule, reversible 15-PGDH inhibitor that occupies the PGE2 binding site
  • Lineage: this is the Helen Blau Stanford program. Stanford’s 15-PGDH patent applications are licensed to Epirium, and Blau is a cofounder of Myoforte and Epirium with equity and stock options, disclosed in Stanford’s own press materials
  • Phase 1: completed. 100 healthy participants, single and multiple ascending doses, 75 to 800 mg, food effect, plus separate cohorts aged 18 to 65 and over 65 to 75. Ran 20 December 2024 to 9 October 2025 at two US sites. Registry record posted retrospectively in May 2026. Company reported no serious adverse events
  • Regulatory: positive Type C end-of-Phase 1 FDA meeting on 27 to 28 January 2026, with agreement on population, endpoints, duration and dosing for a roughly 200-patient, 6-month Phase 2b in age-related sarcopenia
  • Current pipeline as published by the company: MF-300 Phase 2b in start-up for sarcopenia with possible label expansion to sarcopenic obesity; osteoporosis listed as Phase 2 ready, with the bone biomarker and bone mineral density readout coming from the sarcopenia study; preclinical new chemical entities in spinal muscular atrophy, inflammatory bowel disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. First patient in the open-label Phase 2 is now guided to Q1 2027, and to Q2 2027 for the double-blind study, which is a slip from the 2H 2026 enrollment guidance given in January 2026 [Confidence: High on the guidance as published, Medium on whether it holds]
  • Financing: 85 million dollar Series A in December 2019 (Longitude, ARCH, Horizons Ventures, Vertex Ventures HC, Adams Street, The Longevity Fund and others). A planned Series B appears in a May 2025 company deck but no raise has been announced [Confidence: Medium]
  • Links: pipeline | press releases | Phase 1, NCT07613684 | Phase 1 results release | FDA Type C meeting release | IBD preclinical data at DDW 2026 | Stanford disclosure of the Epirium license

Humanwell Healthcare, through Wuhan Humanwell Innovative Drug R&D (China), compound HW201877

  • Mechanism: oral 15-PGDH inhibitor, reported IC50 3.6 nM
  • Indication: inflammatory bowel disease. A separate preclinical program targets idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
  • Regulatory and clinical: NMPA clinical trial approval 17 December 2024, announced March 2025. Phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study in healthy subjects, registration CTR20252242, first subject 26 June 2025, 106 subjects, single center at the First Hospital of Jilin University, listed as completed [Confidence: Medium on the completion date, which comes from a commercial mirror of the Chinese registry rather than the registry itself]
  • Links: medicinal chemistry paper, J Med Chem 2025 | company announcement of the NMPA approval | drug profile

Alchemab Therapeutics (UK), compound ATLX-2847, the only antibody in the class

  • Mechanism: a patient-derived antibody that binds and inhibits 15-PGDH, so it raises PGE2 without a small molecule. Origin is Alchemab’s screening of antibodies from unusually resilient patients
  • Indication on the pipeline: muscle atrophy, preclinical, with IND guided to the second half of 2026. A September 2026 company statement anticipates starting Phase 1 by the end of 2026. No trial is registered yet
  • The patent family also claims Parkinson’s disease and neuroinflammation, and the program received a Michael J. Fox Foundation grant of about 595,000 dollars in June 2024
  • Links: pipeline | Michael J. Fox Foundation award | anti-PGDH antibody patent, WO2025133700A2 | September 2026 leadership and clinical plans release

2. Companies with programs but nothing in the clinic

Amgen, holding the original Case Western chemistry through the Rodeo acquisition

  • Rodeo Therapeutics, Seattle, was founded in 2017 by Accelerator Life Science Partners around the Markowitz and Ready chemistry. Its development candidate was RTX-1688, an oral 15-PGDH inhibitor nominated for inflammatory bowel disease in August 2020
  • Amgen announced the acquisition on 30 March 2021 for 55 million dollars up front and up to 666 million dollars in milestones, about 721 million total. Rodeo was preclinical at the time, with colitis named as the first intended indication
  • Since then the only public evidence of activity is chemistry. Amgen filed a 15-PGDH modulator patent family with a May 2023 priority, published in late 2024, claiming inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s, fibrosis, hair density, dermal wound healing and bone formation. There is no AMG compound code, no trial, and no 15-PGDH entry in Amgen’s public pipeline as of August 2026. Shelved is plausible but not stated anywhere [Confidence: Medium that the program is inactive, High that nothing is in the clinic]
  • Links: Amgen acquisition release | Rodeo candidate nomination | Amgen patent WO2024233550A1 | Amgen pipeline | Case Western on the sale

Myoforte Therapeutics (Menlo Park), the Blau and Delp spinout now folded into Epirium

  • Founded 2017 by Helen Blau and Scott Delp. Site is still live, listing Duchenne muscular dystrophy, sarcopenia and localized atrophy, with Robert Booth as executive chairman, Vivek Shenoy president, Roopa Rai heading medicinal chemistry
  • Evidence that it is now effectively Epirium: the MYOFORTE trademark is owned by Epirium Bio, Stanford’s 15-PGDH applications are licensed to Epirium, Stanford describes Blau as a cofounder of “Myoforte/Epirium,” the clinical compound carries the MF prefix, and Epirium patent filings list Myoforte chemists. No merger announcement or corporate filing was found, so the legal arrangement is unclear [Confidence: Medium]
  • Myoforte Therapeutics Inc. still holds granted 15-PGDH patents, including grants in 2022, 2024 and February 2026
  • Links: Myoforte | Myoforte patents | MYOFORTE trademark owned by Epirium

Innovo Therapeutics (Korea) with Daewoong Pharmaceutical as licensee, compound INV-008

  • Oral 15-PGDH inhibitor for inflammatory bowel disease, discovered on Innovo’s AI platform. Daewoong licensed it worldwide on 12 to 13 May 2026 for about 440 million dollars in total value, with a 6.5 billion won upfront payment and up to 656 billion won in milestones plus royalties. Daewoong leads clinical development
  • Stage is inconsistent across sources. All the deal coverage says preclinical, while Innovo’s own pipeline page labels INV-008 Phase 1. No IND approval or trial registration exists in any registry I searched, so the Phase 1 label is unsupported [Confidence: High that it is not yet in a registered trial]
  • Separately, Innovo published a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a topical cosmetic containing the 15-PGDH inhibitor DPP for androgenetic alopecia, 56 enrolled, in April 2026. That is a cosmetic product study, not a drug trial, and it is the only human exposure data for a 15-PGDH inhibitor outside the two Phase 1 studies
  • Links: Innovo pipeline | Daewoong licensing deal coverage | BioWorld on the deal | alopecia trial, Cosmetics 2026 | mechanism paper, Molecules 2026

Nimbus Therapeutics (Cambridge, Massachusetts), discovery chemistry only

  • Published a structure-based 15-PGDH inhibitor design paper in August 2025 with a lead compound that raised colonic PGE2 in mice, and stated that further optimization would be reported later. No 15-PGDH program appears on the company pipeline, no candidate, no indication committed [Confidence: Medium to High]
  • Links: paper hosted by Nimbus | Nimbus publications

Kyorin Pharmaceutical (Japan), patents only

  • A 15-PGDH inhibitor patent family with a January 2019 priority, granted in the US in 2025 and 2026, claiming fibrosis, COPD, asthma, IBD, dermatitis, wound healing, osteoporosis, hair growth and muscle regeneration. No publication, no compound code, and no entry in Kyorin’s published pipeline as of July 2026 [Confidence: Medium that the program is inactive]
  • Links: US 12,304,897 | WO2020160151A1 | Kyorin pipeline

Others worth a line

  • ScinnoHub Pharmaceutical and Chengdu Brilliant Pharmaceutical (China): 15-PGDH inhibitor patent filings in 2024 claiming autoimmune disease, fibrosis and ulcerative colitis. Neither company’s disclosed pipeline lists a 15-PGDH drug, and the patent numbers sit behind a subscription service [Confidence: Low on details]
  • L’Oreal (France): the oldest commercial 15-PGDH inhibitor patents, from 2003, aimed at skin and hair pigmentation. Historical
  • Ventyx Biosciences, acquired by Eli Lilly in January 2026: a single 2023 trade headline claims Ventyx patented 15-PGDH inhibitors, but no such patent or asset could be found. Do not assume Lilly has a program here [Confidence: Low, treat as unverified]

3. Academic groups, where most of the chemistry and biology still lives

Case Western Reserve University with UT Southwestern, the founding axis

  • People: Sanford Markowitz, Stanton Gerson, Amar Desai, Andrew Pieper, Stephen Fink and Derek Taylor at Case Western; Joseph Ready, Bruce Posner and Noelle Williams at UT Southwestern
  • Compounds: SW033291, the universal tool compound with a reported Ki near 0.1 nM, its active enantiomer, the water-soluble second generation (+)-SW209415, and the orally bioavailable quinoxaline SW222746
  • Indications pursued: bone marrow transplant and hematopoietic recovery, colitis, liver regeneration, kidney injury with Korean collaborators at Inje University, lung allograft rejection, and neurodegeneration. The 2025 PNAS paper reporting that 15-PGDH inhibition protects the blood brain barrier and protects mice in Alzheimer’s and traumatic brain injury models won the PNAS Cozzarelli Prize. A September 2026 Redox Biology paper with Seoul National University reports neuroprotection in three Parkinson’s models and explicitly proposes repurposing MF-300
  • Licensing: this chemistry went to Rodeo and therefore to Amgen. Patents are co-assigned across Rodeo, Case Western and the University of Texas system
  • Note the institutional split. Markowitz also holds an NCI R35 grant to restore or re-induce 15-PGDH for colorectal cancer prevention, which is the opposite of inhibiting it
  • Links: Markowitz lab | founding paper, Science 2015 | quinoxaline inhibitors, J Med Chem 2022 | inhibitor structures, Nat Commun 2023 | blood brain barrier and Alzheimer’s, PNAS 2025 | Parkinson’s, Redox Biology 2026 | hematopoietic aging preprint 2025 | Markowitz patents | NCI R35 on restoring 15-PGDH

Stanford, Helen Blau lab, the source of the aging framing

  • The paper behind the thread you linked: Palla, Ravichandran, Wang and colleagues, “Inhibition of prostaglandin-degrading enzyme 15-PGDH rejuvenates aged muscle mass and strength,” Science 371, eabc8059, online 10 December 2020, DOI 10.1126/science.abc8059. Blau’s term for 15-PGDH is a gerozyme, an enzyme whose accumulation with age itself drives decline
  • Follow-on work, all using SW033291 as the tool: neuromuscular junction regeneration after denervation (Science Translational Medicine, October 2023); multiomic evidence that PGE2 reverses aged muscle stem cell dysfunction (Cell Stem Cell, June 2025); cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis with Nidhi Bhutani (Science, November 2025); and rescue of the muscle regeneration deficit caused by GLP-1 receptor agonist weight loss (PNAS 2026, from a February 2026 preprint). That last one is the commercially loudest new indication
  • Stanford patents name Blau on muscle conditions, PGE2-driven muscle regeneration, tissue rejuvenation by 15-PGDH inhibition, joint structure and function, mitochondrial biogenesis, neuromuscular junction morphology, and cardiac dysfunction
  • Links: Blau lab | Science 2021 muscle paper | Sci Transl Med 2023, neuromuscular junctions | Cell Stem Cell 2025 | Science 2025, cartilage | GLP-1 muscle loss preprint 2026 | Blau and Porpiglia review, Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2026 | Blau patents | Stanford cardiac 15-PGDH docket

Smaller groups

  • Inje University, Korea (Ki Beom Bae, Sun-Hee Kim, Hye Jung Kim): kidney injury, ischemic, endotoxin-induced and contrast-induced, via the PGE2 and EP4 axis. Co-assignees on Case Western renal patents. This same group produced the strongest cancer warning in section 4
  • Seoul National University (Min-Kyoo Shin): Parkinson’s, with Case Western
  • Jiangsu University (Chunlai Feng, Mengjie Rui): natural product 15-PGDH inhibitors screened for liver regeneration
  • University of Kentucky (Hsin-Hsiung Tai): the historical origin of the chemistry, including the NIH probe ML148

4. The cancer problem, which the aging literature mostly does not address

15-PGDH is a well-established tumor suppressor. It is silenced in roughly 80 percent of colorectal cancers, and its loss is a documented mechanism of resistance to aspirin and celecoxib chemoprevention. PGE2 itself is immunosuppressive in tumors, which is the entire rationale for the EP2 and EP4 antagonist industry described in the previous scan. Chronically inhibiting the enzyme that clears PGE2, in an older population, runs directly into that literature. [Confidence: High on the biology, Medium on the magnitude of clinical risk, which nobody has measured]

The specific paper to keep on file: Kim and colleagues, Anticancer Research 42(11):5385, 2022, reported that SW033291 increased colon cancer liver metastasis in vivo and upregulated epithelial to mesenchymal transition genes. It comes from the same Korean group that publishes the beneficial kidney results, which makes it harder to dismiss as an outlier. [Confidence: Medium to High]

Counterweight, such as it is: an AACR 2025 abstract reports that 15-PGDH inhibition prevented tumor development in the colitis-associated AOM and DSS model, which is plausibly an anti-colitis effect rather than an anti-tumor one. I found no peer-reviewed paper showing that a 15-PGDH inhibitor improves anti-tumor immunity. Both Phase 1 programs so far are short-exposure healthy volunteer studies, and the first chronic dosing data will come from the 6-month Phase 2b. Cancer surveillance in a sarcopenia trial of 200 patients over 6 months has essentially no power to settle this. [Confidence: High]


5. The unresolved contradiction with the EP2 story

Put the two scans side by side.

  • Blau, Stanford, Science, December 2020: PGE2 falls with age because 15-PGDH accumulates, and raising PGE2 rejuvenates muscle. Prescription: raise PGE2
  • Andreasson, Stanford, Nature, January 2021, and again in the Science paper you had me analyze: PGE2 signaling through EP2 on aged myeloid cells suppresses their metabolism and clearance function, and blocking it reverses cognitive decline and multi-organ aging. Prescription: block PGE2 signaling

The usual reconciliation is compartmental. PGE2 acts on four receptors, EP1 through EP4, with different couplings, and the relevant target cells differ: muscle stem cells and chondrocytes in the Blau work, tissue-resident macrophages and microglia in the Andreasson work. A local deficit in one tissue and a pathological excess of one receptor’s signaling in another are not formally incompatible. [Confidence: Medium as a hypothesis, Low that it has been demonstrated]

What breaks the tidy version of that story is the central nervous system. The Case Western and Pieper group reports that 15-PGDH inhibition, which raises PGE2, protects the blood brain barrier and is anti-neuroinflammatory in Alzheimer’s, traumatic brain injury and Parkinson’s models. Andreasson’s group reports that blocking PGE2 signaling at EP2 is anti-neuroinflammatory in aging and Alzheimer’s models. Same organ, same broad aging context, opposite sign, both in high-profile journals. I found no paper that addresses this directly. A 2026 Frontiers in Pharmacology review comes closest, framing aging as a tissue-contextual imbalance in PGE2 signaling and endorsing 15-PGDH inhibition for muscle while endorsing EP2 and EP4 antagonism for cancer and neuroinflammation, without explaining the CNS conflict. [Confidence: High that the contradiction is unresolved in the literature]

Practical read: whichever direction is right is probably receptor-specific and cell-type-specific rather than a matter of total PGE2, and neither camp has run the experiment that would settle it, which is a head-to-head in the same animals with both interventions and both muscle and brain endpoints. Treat both theses as live and neither as settled.


6. Access and what to watch

  • There is no approved or obtainable 15-PGDH inhibitor. SW033291 is a research chemical, and the mouse work used intraperitoneal injection, not oral dosing. MF-300 exists only inside Epirium’s trials
  • The forum thread you linked floats dinoprostone and castor oil as workarounds. Neither is a substitute. Dinoprostone is a uterotonic used to induce labor, systemic oral exposure is poor and short-lived, and deliberately raising systemic PGE2 with a labor-induction drug carries cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and uterine effects that have nothing to do with a targeted, tissue-level enzyme inhibition. The mechanism that makes 15-PGDH inhibition interesting is the local restoration of PGE2 in tissues where the enzyme has accumulated, which exogenous PGE2 does not reproduce [Confidence: High]
  • Things that would change the picture: the Epirium Phase 2b in sarcopenia, now guided to first patient in Q1 2027, which will be the first chronic human dosing and the first efficacy readout in an aging indication; Alchemab’s Phase 1 for the antibody, guided to late 2026; any Amgen disclosure of what happened to the Rodeo assets; and any carcinogenicity or tumor-surveillance data from either clinical program
  • For your own tracking, the GLP-1 angle is the one most likely to pull money into this class quickly, since muscle loss on semaglutide and tirzepatide is now a mainstream concern and the Blau group has published exactly that rescue experiment in mice

Sources

Epirium pipeline | Epirium press releases | MF-300 Phase 1, NCT07613684 | MF-300 Phase 1 results | FDA Type C meeting | Stanford license disclosure | Myoforte | Myoforte patents | HW201877 chemistry | HW201877 NMPA approval | Alchemab pipeline | Alchemab anti-PGDH patent | Amgen and Rodeo | Amgen 15-PGDH patent | Amgen pipeline | Rodeo candidate RTX-1688 | Innovo pipeline | Daewoong and Innovo deal | Nimbus 15-PGDH chemistry | Kyorin patent | Markowitz lab | Science 2015 founding paper| Nat Commun 2023 structures | PNAS 2025 blood brain barrier | Redox Biology 2026 Parkinson’s | Blau lab | Science 2021 muscle | Sci Transl Med 2023 | Cell Stem Cell 2025 | Science 2025 cartilage | GLP-1 muscle preprint | Anticancer Research 2022 metastasis | PNAS 2006 tumor suppressor | PNAS 2009 chemoprevention resistance | Frontiers in Pharmacology 2026 | Nature 2021 Andreasson

1 Like

The unresolved contradiction is bloody confusing - and from the same academic institution…

1 Like

Right now I’m voting on Helen Blau, she’s a leader in the field and has been researching 15-PGDH for over a decade I believe, and her drug is in clinical trials (so they’ve got some decent funding by people who would (hopefully) do some significant due diligence.

3 Likes