For those in Australia, the authors used Noumi PUREnFERRIN, “prepared directly from fresh Australian cow’s milk whey”: PUREnFERRIN™ | Noumi Limited
The effect on CRP and IL-6 is weird:
Only high dose lactoferrin decreased systemic inflammation in this study, with lower IL-6 and CRP seen in Lf-High compared to Lf-Low, though concentrations were not different to the placebo group. Other trials have shown that lower lactoferrin doses are able to reduce IL- 6, with doses ≤200mg/d or equivalent to the Lf-Low intervention(59; 23; 60; 14; 44; 25), though these studies were mostly conducted in populations with inflammatory diseases or disrupted iron homeostasis. The literature does not show consistent effects of lactoferrin supplementation on circulating CRP. Longer duration trials with doses ≤200mg/d for 12- weeks have reported decreased CRP levels, though other trials with both higher and lower doses than the high dose intervention have shown no effect(59; 61). Plasma TNF-α was not affected by either the Lf-High or Lf-Low intervention in this study. Other studies with doses ≤200mg/d and longer duration (3 months) have shown reductions in plasma TNF-α (59; 61) , while a trial with 1000mg/d for 12 weeks showed no effect on this biomarker(62) . In healthy older adults, a higher dose of lactoferrin may be required to reduce systemic inflammatory biomarkers, though further evidence is required in this population group.
Why would CRP increase with low dose but decrease with high dose? Can the increase just be transient?
Currently, I have been taking NutriCost lactoferrin, which I assume is bovine-derived, as the supplement says it contains milk. After reading the Rap Admin posts, I think I will start putting the capsules inside an empty enteric-coated capsule. I do this with some other supplements, such as rapamycin and probiotics. When I finish this batch, I am going to switch to Double Wood.
There is a patented form of lactoferrin that some supplement companies, such as Double Wood, use.
It is indeed bovine lactoferrin. There are many companies on Amazon that supply bovine lactoferrin, but Bioferrin seems like the best choice.
Gemini:
Bioferrin is a specific, patented form of bovine lactoferrin, a naturally occurring glycoprotein found in high levels in colostrum (the first milk produced after birth), which helps the body regulate iron absorption and fight infections.
Source: It is isolated from fresh sweet whey using advanced fractionation and separation processing technologies.
Iron Saturation: Bioferrin is partially saturated with iron, which allows it to bind to free iron particles in the intestines and help the body utilize them efficiently without the typical gastrointestinal upset associated with other iron sources like ferrous sulfate.
Bioavailability: Clinical research cited by manufacturers like Glanbia Nutritionals indicates that lactoferrin may be up to 5.8 times more bioavailable for increasing serum ferritin levels compared to other sources of iron.
Potency: When tested against other lactoferrin brands, Bioferrin reportedly led with a high concentration of lactoferrin peptides, contributing to its potency.
Some brands that contain Bioferrin:
Double Wood Supplements
This brand explicitly states on their packaging that their lactoferrin supplement uses the patented Bioferrin ingredient from Glanbia Nutritionals.
Reviewers on retailer websites like Walmart and Amazon often cite the product’s use of Bioferrin as a key reason for purchase, highlighting its superior iron absorption properties.
bioQuad Life Sciences
BioQuad’s " Lactoferrin Gold 1.8 " is a supplement that uses the Bioferrin ingredient for immune support, digestive health, and iron absorption.
This product is lactose-free, gluten-free, and non-GMO.
MFIT SUPPS
Their “Bi-Immune” product lists 300mg of Bioferrin 2000 per serving as a key immune-boosting ingredient, alongside vitamins D, C, and Zinc.
Doctor Life
Doctor Life uses the “unique and strongest” Bioferrin 2000 form developed by Glanbia Nutritionals.strong text
How would you compare Lactoferrin to bovine collostrum? Would it work instead of Lactoferrin used in this study?
Gemini Response:
Based on the pharmacological mechanisms and concentration gradients in the broader literature, no, bovine colostrum would not work similarly to the standardized bovine lactoferrin (bLf) used in mitochondrial dysfunction studies.
While colostrum contains lactoferrin, it is a complex biological fluid driven primarily by immunoglobulins and growth factors, whereas isolated lactoferrin acts as a precision iron-modulator and mitochondrial antioxidant. Substituting them for the specific endpoint of “mitochondrial repair” would likely fail for three specific reasons:
1. The “Dose-Volume” Impossibility
The primary limiting factor is concentration. In the study context you likely referenced (targeting mitochondrial ROS or iron sequestration), the effective human equivalent dose is often 250mg–1000mg of pure lactoferrin.
Natural Concentration: Bovine colostrum typically contains only 0.5% to 1.5% lactoferrin by weight.
The Math: To achieve a therapeutic dose of 600mg of lactoferrin (the dose calculated in our procurement search), you would need to consume approximately 40 to 120 grams of standard bovine colostrum powder daily.
Result: You cannot achieve the specific mitochondrial signal of bLf using standard colostrum capsules without ingesting massive, caloric, and potentially digestive-disturbing amounts of powder.
OK - I’ve updated the list above to only include the brands that MasterJohn suggests are acceptable: Lattoglobina, Double Wood and Lactoferrin Co. (and additionally Life Extension brand).
They are quite expensive on a per day basis at 600mg per day. If people are successful in lowering their inflammaging measures using those supplements, it might be interesting to try some of the lower cost supplements that have been identified by AI, and see if the reductions continue…
RapAdmin is doing our community a fine service with his intriguing series of biohacker analysis on a range of issues.
The latest one, on lactoferrin, has the added virtue of showing results on humans. My IL-6 at 2.0 pg/Ml is border-line. For me it’s a no-brainer to start lactoferrin to try to get it down to under 1.
My CRP, at 0.2, may be less of a target, and anyway the impact of lactoferrin on that is less consistent than it is on IL-6.
Excellent CRP and so-so IL-6 is not uncommon and the higher IL-6 carries independent risk.
By your measure you might need to drink 20 liters of milk to get the 600mg lactoferrin (in two capsules) that was used in the study. Per day. Go for it
The world’s first bio-identical human lactoferrin: Helaina effera
effera™ is the world’s first bio-identical lactoferrin, precision-made to be functionally equivalent to the protein in mother’s milk. It’s the foundational protein for human health, delivered with undeniable impact.
SwissRX Revitalize: A dedicated, high-dose (340mg) effera™ capsule designed for athletic recovery, immune function, and iron regulation.
Desert Harvest Menopause Support: Combines 300mg of effera™ with aloe vera to target hormonal fluctuations, bone health, and iron deficiency.
Sunny Within Longevity: A liquid sachet formulation combining effera™ with NAD+, glutathione, and CoQ10 for cellular aging support.
Kroma Wellness: Incorporates effera™ for gut health and immune support, particularly in their, “Super Core” products.
Levelle Nutrition: Offers a “Cycle Syncing Protein” designed for menstruating women, incorporating effera™ for enhanced iron metabolism.
Key Advantages of Effera™ Products:
Bio-identical: As the first precision-fermented human-identical lactoferrin, it avoids immune rejection, with 15x more activity than many bovine, cow-derived alternatives.
Superior Absorption: It mimics human milk, offering better survival through the digestive tract.
Versatile Benefits: Used to treat iron deficiencies without GI distress, enhance immune function, and improve gut health.
Ah,… good point, and there is the issue of the error-bars for these tests at these levels:
Current documentation from Quest Diagnostics and LabCorp indicates the following lower limits of quantitation (LoQ) for their consumer-accessible High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) tests.
Quick Summary: Lowest Measurable Levels
Lab Provider
Lowest Measurable Level (LoQ)
Test Name (Consumer)
Test Code (Clinical)
Quest Diagnostics
0.20 mg/L
hs-CRP Test
91737 (Cardio IQ®)
LabCorp
0.30 mg/L
hs-CRP Test
120766
At the lowest measurable limits (near 0.2–0.3 mg/L), the precision is lower. As you move up to “optimal” ranges (1.0 mg/L), the precision improves significantly.
Measured hs-CRP Level
Estimated CV%
Error Bar (±1 SD)
Confidence Interval (68%)
0.20 mg/L (Quest Limit)
~10%
±0.02 mg/L
0.18 – 0.22 mg/L
0.30 mg/L (LabCorp Limit)
~8–10%
±0.03 mg/L
0.27 – 0.33 mg/L
0.50 mg/L
~5–6%
±0.03 mg/L
0.47 – 0.53 mg/L
1.00 mg/L
~2–4%
±0.03 mg/L
0.97 – 1.03 mg/L
LabCorp (Likely Platform: Roche Cobas c501/c502)
LabCorp extensively utilizes the Roche Cobas platform for their routine chemistry.
Assay: Roche Tina-quant C-Reactive Protein Gen.3
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ): 0.3 mg/L
Precision (CV) at LoQ: The manufacturer specifies a CV of <10% at the functional sensitivity limit (0.3 mg/L).
Precision (CV) at Higher Levels: At 1.0 mg/L and above, the CV drops to <5% (often ~2.5% in real-world QC).
Implication: If LabCorp reports 0.3 mg/L, the true value lies between 0.27 and 0.33 mg/L (with 68% confidence).
Quest Diagnostics (Likely Platform: Siemens or Beckman Coulter)
Quest (and their subsidiary Cleveland HeartLab) typically utilizes high-throughput Siemens or Beckman analyzers for the “Cardio IQ” panel.
Assay: Siemens CardioPhase hsCRP or Beckman AU hsCRP
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ): 0.16 – 0.20 mg/L
Precision (CV) at LoQ: These assays generally exhibit a CV of ~5–7% even at levels as low as 0.4 mg/L. At the absolute floor (0.2 mg/L), the CV widens to roughly 10%.
Implication: If Quest reports 0.2 mg/L, the true value lies between 0.18 and 0.22 mg/L.
3. Why This Matters for Longevity Tracking
For a user tracking “optimal” inflammation (aiming for <0.5 mg/L):
Noise Floor: Do not over-interpret small fluctuations at the bottom. A move from 0.2 mg/L to 0.3 mg/L is borderline noise (it is within ±2 SDs).
Significant Shift: A move from 0.3 mg/L to 0.6 mg/L is a statistically significant doubling of inflammation, well outside the error bars of the assay.
Protocol: To smooth out these error bars, standard clinical guidance (and biohacker best practice) is to average two tests taken 2 weeks apart .
Alas, from Chris Masterjohn I learned that lactoferrin mainly improves high IL-6 values, not middling ones like my 2.0 pg/ml
Studies point the same way. Lactoferrin is not for optimizing fairly normal values.
From perplexity.ai
Lactoferrin can lower IL‑6 in some human settings, but there is no evidence that it will meaningfully reduce an already low baseline IL‑6 of about 2.0 pg/mL in a healthy older adult.
What trials show
A systematic review of 25 human studies found that in adults, bovine lactoferrin reduced IL‑6 in several trials, particularly in people with inflammatory conditions (e.g., anemia of inflammation, diabetes, pregnancy‑related inflammation), but effects were inconsistent on CRP and other markers.[1][2][3]
A meta‑analysis quantified this as a mean IL‑6 reduction of about 25 pg/mL in adults, but those trials mostly involved patients with clearly elevated IL‑6, far above healthy baseline levels.[1][3]
Mechanism and context
In vitro and ex vivo work shows lactoferrin can suppress LPS‑induced IL‑6 production by human immune and epithelial cells, sometimes cutting IL‑6 release by 40–80% under strong inflammatory stimulation.[4][5][6]
Clinical trials where lactoferrin lowered IL‑6 typically involved infection, chronic disease, or malnutrition; data in already healthy, low‑inflammation subjects are limited and show smaller or no changes.[1][7]
What this implies for IL‑6 ≈ 2.0
Your IL‑6 is already in or near the healthy median range, not in the pathologic ranges seen in those trials, so the “room to drop” is small and any reduction from lactoferrin is likely modest or not detectable on standard assays.[1][3]
Lactoferrin might still have niche benefits (antimicrobial, mucosal, iron‑modulating), but using it specifically to push IL‑6 below ~2.0 is not supported by strong human evidence and is unlikely to change risk meaningfully compared with your current profile.
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major global health challenge, necessitating alternative or adjuvant strategies such as lactoferrin (Lf) and probiotics. Opportunistic bacteria are key drivers of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) due to their ability to form biofilms and cause persistent infections. Lf, a glycoprotein present in mammalian milk and secretions, exhibits antimicrobial properties as part of innate immunity. Similarly, probiotics—primarily lactic acid bacteria (LAB)—influence pathogen growth and adhesion. This study evaluated the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm effects of purified bovine Lf (bLf) versus commercial Lf, alone and combined with LAB-derived supernatants, against several opportunistic strains. Using qualitative and quantitative methods, we assessed the antimicrobial, anti-adherence, and immunomodulatory activities of bLf (Sigma-Aldrich), commercial Lf (Jarrow Formulas), and LAB supernatants. High-purity bLf demonstrated superior antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects compared to supplement-derived Lf. Furthermore, commercial Lf, combined with LAB metabolites, effectively inhibited biofilm formation, reduced inflammation, and prevented bacterial adhesion to eukaryotic cells. These findings support the potential use of lactoferrin, alone or in synergy with probiotics, as adjuvants or prophylactic agents, particularly for immunocompromised patients, to limit bacterial adherence and prevent chronic infections.
So do you need to combine lactoferrin supplements with probiotics?
I am going to read up more on this topic, so apologies if I’ve missed something already discussed. While I’m all for crushing inflammation (CRP) etc., I’m concerned about increasing iron levels in my body and the potential for polycythemia that may come from that. My initial query to Chat GPT is that lactoferrin can indeed increase iron levels. It is recommended for people with iron deficiency anemia and in pregnancy, particularly those who haven’t tolerated oral iron supplements well. If this is the case, I will look for other ways to reduce inflammation (unless of course I develop iron deficiency anemia which I do not currently have with Hgb. of 15.5).
I asked Grok the same question about excess iron levels due to lactoferrin and it said that it helps iron homeostasis, it’s like increasing a lot of transferrin so there won’t be any iron floating around. Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me can help us with this question.