Elastin Fragments Identified as Drivers of Systemic Aging

Yi and colleagues demonstrate that age-induced degradation of extracellular matrix generates elastin-derived fragments that activate the innate and adaptive immune system, which evokes systemic inflammaging.

A new Nature Aging study reports that fragments of elastin—the long-lived structural protein critical for arterial elasticity, lung compliance, and skin integrity—are not passive signs of tissue deterioration but active pro-aging signals. These elastin-derived peptides, or “elastokines,” increase with age and trigger a coordinated inflammatory cascade that accelerates metabolic decline, immune dysregulation, and multi-organ aging. Crucially, the paper also identifies a druggable node in this pathway: NEU1, an enzyme in the elastin receptor complex whose inhibition by the small molecule DANA extends lifespan when administered late in life.

The researchers found that circulating elastin fragments rise steadily in mice and humans across adulthood. To test causality, healthy mice were infused with elastin-derived peptides, including the key hexapeptide VGVAPG (“E-motif”). These peptides were sufficient to induce canonical aging phenotypes: increased fat mass, decreased lean mass, elevated IL-1 and IL-6, impaired physical function, and shortened lifespan. This establishes that elastin fragmentation is not merely correlated with aging but capable of driving systemic decline.

Mechanistic analysis showed that the fragments are sensed by monocytes and macrophages via a NEU1-containing elastin receptor complex. Activation of this pathway reprograms the innate immune system, which then reshapes adaptive immunity. Single-cell transcriptomics revealed expansion of IFN-γ–producing Th1 cells, cytotoxic-like CD4 T cells, and inflammatory CD8 subsets typical of “inflammaging.” Transferring these reprogrammed T cells into immunodeficient mice propagated the inflammatory-metabolic dysfunction, demonstrating that the immune system becomes a vector of elastin-fragment–induced aging.

The most notable translational finding comes from blocking NEU1. Administration of the neuraminidase inhibitor DANA in mice exposed to elastin fragments normalized inflammatory cytokines, restored metabolic parameters, reduced liver and kidney stress markers, and improved tissue histology. The intervention was then applied to naturally aging mice, starting in late life (around 60–65 weeks). Weekly DANA injections produced a significant extension of median lifespan—approximately 17% in males and 12% in females—along with measurable improvements in grip strength, endurance, locomotion, body composition, and reductions in p16-linked cellular senescence. These effects occurred without dietary manipulation and were observed in otherwise healthy wild-type animals, underscoring the therapeutic relevance of blocking this extracellular-matrix-to-immune signaling axis.

A combination arm pairing DANA with rapamycin demonstrated even greater survival benefits than either treatment alone. The synergy suggests that mitigating extracellular-matrix–derived inflammatory signaling (via NEU1 inhibition) and suppressing nutrient-sensing pathways (via mTOR modulation) act through complementary mechanisms and may represent a next-generation, multi-target longevity strategy.

Complementary experiments showed that senescent cells are major generators of elastin fragments through elevated elastase activity. Treating old mice with the senolytics dasatinib plus quercetin reduced circulating elastin fragments, reinforcing the view that senescence and ECM degradation are tightly coupled upstream drivers of age-related inflammation.

Human cross-sectional data from over 1,000 adults revealed that higher elastin fragments correlate with worse metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular markers and higher blood pressure at all ages. While observational, these patterns align with the mechanistic mouse data and suggest that elastin fragments may serve as biomarkers of biological aging.

Longevity Implications

This research identifies a previously underappreciated axis of systemic aging: elastin fragmentation → NEU1 activation → myeloid inflammation → T-cell remodeling → metabolic and organ decline. Protecting elastin integrity—through smoking avoidance, air-quality protection, tight blood-pressure control, metabolic optimization, periodontal care, structured exercise, and UV avoidance—may reduce upstream elastase activity. The late-life lifespan extension achieved through NEU1 inhibition is especially notable: it positions the extracellular matrix as a viable, druggable longevity target, potentially synergistic with established pathways such as mTOR and senescent-cell clearance.

Source Research Paper (Open Access): Elastin-derived extracellular matrix fragments drive aging through innate immune activation

Related:

5 Likes

Commentary from longevity researchers on this study:

our body’s degrading scaffold might be aging you.

The elastin holding your tissues together was mostly made in development, so damage slowly accumulates as we age, and elastin breakdown products can be detected in the blood.

Are these fragments just detritus, or do they interfere with the coordination of healthy biology?

A new paper in Nature Aging (linked below) tracked elastin fragments across a 1,068-person cohort (previous studies used ~200 people max) and found the fragments correlate with aging indicators like hypertension, BMI, liver and kidney markers, metabolic dysfunction.

To test if the fragments actually cause aging rather than just correlate with it, they gave mice elastin fragments over 24 weeks. High doses reduced lifespan by up to 17%. What’s interesting is they used much lower doses than previous studies but gave them for longer to more closely model the aging process.

The mechanism is: elastin breakdown products activate monocytes and macrophages through NEU1, which then activate T cells and drive chronic inflammation. Your body basically treats its own degraded scaffolding as a threat.

What’s interesting is they used much lower doses than previous studies but gave them for longer (24 weeks) to actually mimic the aging process rather than just acute disease. And it’s not just elastin - other ECM fragments like hyaluronan and fibronectin also shortened lifespan (though not as much).

They tested “DANA” (2,3-dehydro-2-deoxy-N-acetylneuraminic acid), a NEU1-selective sialidase inhibitor, in naturally aging mice and it extended both healthspan and lifespan (caveat, their controls were a bit short lived. Needs replication). It worked synergistically with rapamycin. DANA has been used as the structural basis for FDA-approved drugs like Tamiflu, so it’s not a brand new molecule. It has regulatory precedence.

Degraded ECM does more than simply degrade with aging. There’s evidence it also drives it, which opens up new potential anti-aging targets worth exploring.

Source: https://x.com/NornGroup/status/1994175033661333835?s=20

2 Likes

The obvious question… are there any existing drugs that inhibit NEU1? Unfortunately not.

NEU1-specific drug candidates (none approved yet)

Several groups are actively designing mammalian NEU1-selective inhibitors because NEU1 is implicated in:

  • pulmonary fibrosis
  • non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
  • cardiovascular remodeling
  • tumor progression
  • inflammatory diseases
  • ECM degradation (as in the aging study)

Promising directions:

4.1 Bicyclic and tricyclic sialic-acid analogues (2022–2024)

  • Modifications to improve NEU1 selectivity.
  • Good in vitro potency (low micromolar).
  • No in vivo data yet.

4.2 Macrocyclic NEU1 inhibitors

  • Bind a secondary pocket unique to NEU1.
  • Currently only in enzyme assays.

4.3 Covalent NEU1-targeted ligands

  • Designed using fragment-based screening.
  • Possibly the most promising, but pre-preclinical.

4.4 NEU1 antibodies / biologics

  • In development but NEU1 is largely intracellular/lysosomal, making targeting difficult.

None are anywhere near FDA approval.


5. Bottom Line

There are currently zero approved drugs that meaningfully inhibit NEU1.

The only compounds showing real inhibition are:

  • DANA (weak, broad, not drug-like)
  • DANA derivatives (experimental)
  • Novel inhibitors from 2022–2024 medicinal chemistry literature
  • RNA-based methods (laboratory use only)

Some approved drugs can modulate NEU1 expression , or indirectly reduce its functional signaling , but none inhibit its enzymatic activity .

For longevity science:

The NEU1 pathway is druggable, but currently not drugged. The mouse lifespan-extension result will almost certainly catalyze development of NEU1-selective therapeutics, much like how DANA led to modern antivirals.

1 Like

Isn’t this hyaluronic acid? This is commonly used in skincare and also is a supplement, which I take. I need to look more into this. GPT theorized that supplementing isn’t the same.

Also this entire thing is very interesting. We are getting close to cleaning up the mess of elastin breakdown, but does this give us any insight into preventing elastin breakdown, or slowing it, or reversing it?

Elastinase inhibitors? Though it seems that might prevent the breakdown of fragments.

I ran all of this post through ChatGPT then tried to figure out what elastinase inhibitors already exist and utilizing what is currently approved, what is in clinical trials, research chemicals and more what would be the most aggressive combination we could use to slow down or reverse damage to elastin:

Let’s put together a hypothetical, maximalist ECM/elastin preservation protocol based on everything known today—approved drugs, off-label uses, research chemicals, natural compounds, and lifestyle interventions. I’ll structure it in mechanistic layers, from upstream prevention of breakdown to downstream modulation of NEU1 signaling and systemic inflammation. This is purely theoretical and not a prescription.


1. Upstream: Reduce Elastin Degradation

Goal: Minimize elastase activity and ECM breakdown.

Pharmacologic/Research Options:

  • MMP inhibitors (experimental/research use):
    • Broad-spectrum MMP inhibitors exist (batimastat, marimastat) but toxic long-term. Consider low-dose selective MMP inhibitors if available in preclinical settings (MMP-9, MMP-12 inhibitors).
  • Serine elastase inhibitors:
    • Sivelestat – inhibits neutrophil elastase (studied for ARDS). Could theoretically reduce systemic elastin breakdown from inflammation.
  • Cathepsin inhibitors:
    • Odanacatib (cathepsin K inhibitor) reduces elastin and collagen degradation in bone/vascular tissue.
  • Senolytics:
    • Dasatinib + Quercetin – reduce senescent cells, the major source of elastase activity.
    • Fisetin is a milder alternative, may be easier for repeated late-life dosing.

Natural Compounds:

  • EGCG (green tea extract) – inhibits MMPs, antioxidant.
  • Curcumin / Piperine combo – MMP suppression and anti-inflammatory.
  • Quercetin – overlapping senolytic and MMP inhibition.

Lifestyle Measures:

  • UV avoidance / sunscreen to prevent photoaging of elastin.
  • Blood pressure control (hypertension accelerates elastin damage in arteries).
  • Anti-inflammatory diet (omega-3s, polyphenols, low glycemic load).
  • Exercise to maintain healthy tissue turnover.

2. Midstream: Neutralize Elastin Fragments / NEU1 Signaling

Goal: Stop fragments from triggering inflammation.

Experimental Compounds:

  • DANA (2,3-dehydro-2-deoxy-N-acetylneuraminic acid) – weak NEU1 inhibitor, proof-of-concept. Can combine with rapamycin for synergy.
  • Rapamycin / mTOR inhibitors – suppress downstream nutrient-sensing-driven aging; synergistic with NEU1 inhibition.
  • Novel NEU1-selective inhibitors – if accessible in research settings, these are the most direct intervention.

Indirect Modulation:

  • Some approved drugs or nutraceuticals may downregulate NEU1 expression indirectly (less well-studied).

3. Downstream: Reduce Systemic Inflammation & ECM Remodeling

Goal: Prevent T-cell mediated inflammaging and organ dysfunction.

Pharmacologic Options:

  • Senolytics – continue periodic dosing (D + Q, Fisetin, or Navitoclax derivatives) to prevent ongoing elastin release.
  • Anti-inflammatories:
    • Low-dose metformin (AMPK activation, anti-inflammatory).
    • IL-1β inhibitors (canakinumab – research use for inflammaging).
  • Immune modulators:
    • Rapamycin, as above.
    • Possibly thymic rejuvenation approaches (IL-7, growth hormone + thymosin alpha1) to maintain healthy adaptive immunity.

Lifestyle Measures:

  • Caloric/nutrient optimization to reduce metabolic stress.
  • Structured exercise to maintain tissue elasticity and vascular health.

4. Optional: ECM Repair / Regeneration

Goal: Stimulate new elastin or prevent crosslinking degradation.

Experimental Approaches:

  • LOX inhibition (lysyl oxidase modulators) – prevent pathological crosslinking in arteries and skin.
  • TGF-β pathway modulation – can enhance elastin repair but risky if overdone (fibrosis risk).
  • Gene therapy / peptide approaches:
    • Elastin mimetic peptides (like VGVAPG analogues in reverse) or micro-elastin constructs – preclinical only.
  • Stem cell or regenerative therapies – mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to support ECM maintenance in aged tissues (mostly in preclinical or clinical trials).

5. Hypothetical Integrated Protocol

Daily/Weekly Actions:

  1. Senolytic pulse – Fisetin or D + Q once every few weeks/months.
  2. Rapamycin / mTOR modulation – weekly low-dose dosing.
  3. NEU1 modulation – DANA or research NEU1 inhibitor if available.
  4. Anti-elastase support – EGCG, curcumin, quercetin daily. Optional research elastase inhibitors.
  5. Lifestyle – strict UV avoidance, BP control, exercise, anti-inflammatory diet.

Monitoring (research settings):

  • Circulating elastin fragment levels.
  • Inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α).
  • Body composition, grip strength, and metabolic parameters.

In short, the ultimate approach would be multi-layered: reduce elastin breakdown (senolytics + elastase inhibitors), block fragment signaling (NEU1 inhibition), modulate immune response (rapamycin, anti-inflammatories), and support ECM repair where possible.

2 Likes

Its all about the fragment size it seems, and the systemic circulation (not an issue with topicals):

How systemic HA affects longevity

  • Reduces inflammation: High-molecular-weight HA can directly suppress the production of pro-inflammatory factors by immune cells. It can also form physical structures that prevent inflammatory cells from activating, according to this National Institutes of Health (NIH) study.
  • Combats oxidative stress: HA has the ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species, which are damaging byproducts of metabolism that contribute to aging. This protective function is particularly important for long-lived species.
  • Maintains tissue integrity: By supporting the health of the intestinal stem cells, HA helps prevent age-related decline in the intestinal barrier, which is crucial for overall health.
  • Decreases cancer risk: Research indicates that increased HA levels are associated with a lower incidence of both spontaneous and induced cancers in mice, notes this National Institutes of Health (.gov) article.
  • Improves healthspan: By mitigating age-related issues like inflammation and oxidative stress, systemic HA contributes to a longer and healthier life, not just a longer one.

Key distinction: HA size matters

  • The beneficial effects are primarily linked to high-molecular-weight (HMW) HA .
  • Fragmented or low-molecular-weight HA, often produced during inflammation, can have pro-inflammatory effects.
  • The specific effects of HA are complex and depend on factors like size, concentration, and microenvironment, says this NIH article.
2 Likes

Focusing just on this, I dug in deeper. But we also really need to dig deep into the side effects and regular applications of these medications. This is just a start of the learning process.

Prompt: Can you identify the relative effect sizes of these interventions listed here, in terms of their ability to Reduce Elastin Degradation

Response:

Below is a direct, evidence-weighted ranking of the interventions you listed, organized by estimated effect size on elastin preservation (i.e., inhibition of elastases, MMPs, or cathepsins; reduction of ECM-degrading inflammatory programs; or lowering of senescent-cell–derived proteases).

+++ large effect (direct elastase/MMP/cathepsin inhibition; strong senolytic reduction of NE/MMP-rich SASP)

++ moderate effect (potent but indirect modulation; requires high doses or specific delivery)

+ small effect (nutraceutical-level, often weak vs. pharmacologic agents)


Relative Effect Size Ranking (Summary)

Rank Intervention Estimated Effect Size Mechanism
1 Sivelestat +++ Direct neutrophil elastase inhibition
1 Odanacatib +++ Direct cathepsin K inhibition (major elastase)
1 Dasatinib + Quercetin +++ Senescent-cell removal → large drop in elastases/MMPs
2 Selective MMP inhibitors (MMP-9, MMP-12) ++ to +++ Blocks key elastin-degrading MMPs
2 Fisetin ++ Partial senolytic; SASP suppression
3 EGCG + to ++ Mild MMP inhibition
3 Curcumin + Piperine + Weak indirect MMP/NE suppression
3 Quercetin alone + Mild antioxidant/MMP inhibition

Interpretation & Confidence

Best overall strategy for minimizing elastin degradation:

  1. Neutralize the major proteases (NE, CatK, MMP-12)
  2. Reduce the cellular sources (senescent cells, activated neutrophils)
  3. Maintain low systemic inflammation (IL-6, TNF-α)

Confidence Levels

  • High for sivelestat, odanacatib, D+Q (strong mechanistic and preclinical evidence).
  • Moderate for MMP inhibitors (target-specific, toxicity concerns).
  • Low–moderate for nutraceuticals (effect sizes small; dosing constraints).

Full response here:

1 Like

I feel like cycling through some of these and intermittently using some like we do Rapamycin would be the best thing. Almost certainly the things being inhibited exist for a reason and have some benefit so by only inhibiting a few things at a time and cycling through them we would get maximal benefit.

We need more studies though… I wish I was a billionaire haha.

1 Like

They are interesting… pulsed dosing is one strategy that would seem potentially effective while minimizing side effect risks. Datatinib is the only one of these drugs available from India (Sivelestat (marketed as “Elaspo”) seems to be hard to get (not available from India), and an injection drug, Odanacatib was canceled during development).

But - when Sivelestat was launched it was priced at about $40 per 100mg vial, which as far as new drug pricing goes seems amazingly inexpensive (seems the Japanese drug companies are a little less mercenary than the US/Europeans). So if you can get it, it’s probably not cost-prohibitive.

Below are concise, side-effect–focused profiles for each compound, emphasizing frequency of clinically significant adverse effects based on trial data, FDA filings (where applicable), and major published studies. Embedded links give primary literature or regulatory sources.


Sivelestat

Type: Neutrophil elastase inhibitor (IV), approved only in Japan/South Korea for ARDS.
Key safety profile: Generally well tolerated; adverse-event rates modest but include meaningful hepatic and hematologic signals.

Significant side effects (approx. frequency ranges):

  • Liver enzyme elevation: ~5–15% in clinical studies
  • Thrombocytopenia: ~2–5%
  • Renal dysfunction: ~2–4%
  • GI symptoms (nausea, diarrhea): ~5–10%
  • Serious adverse events overall: Not significantly higher than placebo in ARDS trials

Special note: No chronic use safety data; all studies involve short-duration infusion in critical illness.


Odanacatib

Type: Cathepsin K inhibitor for osteoporosis (development terminated).
Key safety profile: Highly effective anti-resorptive drug but major issue was increased stroke risk → program halted by Merck.

Special note: Drug was otherwise well tolerated; the stroke signal was the decisive safety failure.


Dasatinib

Type: Multi-kinase inhibitor (SRC/ABL), FDA-approved for CML; used in low-dose senolytic regimens experimentally.
Key safety profile: Well characterized; significant cytopenias and pleural effusion at standard oncology doses.
Significant side effects (standard 100 mg/day dosing):

  • Myelosuppression:
    • Neutropenia: ~20–35%
    • Thrombocytopenia: ~15–30%
    • Anemia: ~10–15%
      (FDA label)
  • Pleural effusion: ~15–30% (dose- and duration-dependent)
  • Fluid retention (general): ~10–20%
  • QT prolongation: <1%
  • GI toxicity (diarrhea, nausea): 10–20%
  • Infection risk: Increased due to cytopenias (~10–20%)

Low-dose senolytic use (e.g., 2–10 mg):

  • Limited human data; adverse events appear rare (<5%) in short-pulse regimens, but datasets remain small and heterogeneous.

1 Like

Just testing out this research tool that @AlexKChen pointed out:

A Stanford / Berkeley AI Research Tool focused on academic papers (bioRxiv, etc.)

The results for my search on NEU1 inhibitors:

NEU1inhibitors_research-report.pdf (1.2 MB)

1 Like

Elastin_research-report.pdf (1.2 MB)

1 Like

Gemini 3.0 Pro: Based on the mechanisms identified in the paper—specifically the Elastin-NEU1-Immune axis —here are 10 suggestions for natural interventions and off-label drugs that could theoretically interrupt this pathway.

These suggestions target three specific points in the pathway described in the study:

  1. Inhibiting NEU1 (the receptor that triggers the immune response).

  2. Inhibiting Elastase (MMP-12/NE) (the enzymes that chop elastin into toxic fragments).

  3. Clearing Senescent Cells (which the paper identified as the source of the elastase).


Off-Label Pharmaceutical Drugs

1. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu)

  • Mechanism: Direct NEU1 Inhibition.

  • Why it fits: The paper demonstrates that DANA is the molecule that extends lifespan by inhibiting NEU1. The discussion section explicitly notes that DANA shares the “parent scaffold” of FDA-approved neuraminidase inhibitors like Oseltamivir. While Oseltamivir is designed for viral neuraminidase, it has cross-reactivity with human mammalian neuraminidase 1 (NEU1).

  • Target: Blocks the receptor (NEU1) from recognizing the elastin fragment (E-motif).

2. Rapamycin (Sirolimus)

  • Mechanism: mTOR Inhibition & Synergy.

  • Why it fits: The paper explicitly tested Rapamycin in combination with DANA. The results showed that Rapamycin + NEU1 inhibition had a synergistic effect, extending lifespan and healthspan significantly more than either treatment alone. Rapamycin also reduces the secretion of inflammatory factors (SASP) that degrade the extracellular matrix.

  • Target: Downstream inflammation and upstream cellular senescence.

3. Metformin

  • Mechanism: Anti-Glycation & ECM Protection.

  • Why it fits: Elastin degradation is accelerated by glycation (the formation of Advanced Glycation End-products, or AGEs), which makes elastin brittle and prone to fragmentation. By improving insulin sensitivity and reducing blood glucose, Metformin prevents the structural damage that leads to the creation of the toxic fragments described in the paper.

  • Target: Prevents the formation of elastin fragments.

4. Doxycycline (Low Dose)

  • Mechanism: MMP Inhibition.

  • Why it fits: The paper identifies Macrophage Elastase (MMP-12) as a primary enzyme responsible for generating toxic elastin fragments. Doxycycline is a well-known, potent inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs), widely used off-label in dermatology to prevent collagen and elastin destruction.

  • Target: Inhibits the enzymes (MMPs) that cut elastin into toxic fragments.


Natural Interventions & Supplements

5. Quercetin (specifically with a Senolytic agent)

  • Mechanism: Senolytic Activity.

  • Why it fits: The study explicitly performed an experiment using Dasatinib + Quercetin (D+Q) . They found that clearing senescent cells significantly reduced the serum levels of elastin fragments. The researchers concluded that senescent cells are the “factory” producing the elastases that degrade the matrix.

  • Target: Eliminates the cells producing the elastin-degrading enzymes.

6. EGCG (Green Tea Extract)

  • Mechanism: Elastase Inhibition.

  • Why it fits: Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) has been shown in multiple studies to inhibit Macrophage Elastase (MMP-12) and Neutrophil Elastase , the exact two enzymes the paper identifies as responsible for cleaving elastin. By inhibiting these enzymes, fewer “E-motif” fragments are released into circulation.

  • Target: Direct inhibition of elastin degradation.

7. Boswellia Serrata (Frankincense)

  • Mechanism: Neutrophil Elastase Inhibition.

  • Why it fits: The paper identifies Neutrophil Elastase (NE) as a key driver of elastin fragmentation. Boswellic acids are among the few known natural, specific, non-competitive inhibitors of human leukocyte elastase (HLE/Neutrophil Elastase).

  • Target: Stops neutrophils from breaking down elastin.

8. Grape Seed Extract (Procyanidins)

  • Mechanism: Elastin Stabilization.

  • Why it fits: Procyanidins promote the cross-linking of elastin fibers, making them more resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis (being chopped up). If the elastin is stabilized, it cannot be broken down into the “VGVAPG” oligopeptides that trigger the NEU1 receptor.

  • Target: Hardens the extracellular matrix against degradation.

9. Curcumin (Turmeric)

  • Mechanism: NF-κB Inhibition.

  • Why it fits: The paper notes that when the E-motif binds to the receptor, it activates the NF-κB pathway inside monocytes and macrophages, leading to inflammation (IL-1, IL-6). Curcumin is a potent NF-κB inhibitor, theoretically blocking the “signal” even if the elastin fragment binds to the cell.

  • Target: Blocks the downstream inflammatory signal inside the immune cell.

10. Gotu Kola (Centella Asiatica)

  • Mechanism: ECM Remodeling & Synthesis.

  • Why it fits: While the paper focuses on degradation, the antidote is repair. Centella Asiatica is one of the few herbs proven to stimulate fibroblast proliferation and the synthesis of new collagen and fibronectin, helping to maintain the integrity of the extracellular matrix before it degrades into toxic matrikines.

  • Target: ECM maintenance and repair.

2 Likes