I understand that but I’m very hesitant about almost all drugs, but especially those that are fairly recent.
I can’t tell you how many times over the past 40 years that I’ve seen, and continue to see, side effects pop up after a drug has been out long enough or has been used by a large number of people. The examples of this are multiple .
I’ll take some cinnamon extract and chance the glycemic index.
But that’s just me.
A reduced production of insulin will not necessarily mean that your blood glucose levels will rise as long as you are not insulin resistant. I can’t tell if you guys are just looking at A1c tests or wearing a CGM. I do know that once I started taking rapamycin I thought that my new CGM was defective because the readings were higher than normal. I will be interested to see what happens with the next set of monitors.
145 is pretty high. Do you use a finger stick or CGM? Or just go to the doctor and get a fasting? Maybe you got it on a bad day.
Just my opinion but Rapa is a maybe on people. I take it for the arthritis and brain fog. I hope it makes me live longer, but I’m not counting on it.
High blood sugar is a sign of insulin resistance and bad things are happening. I went Keto and started running 2 miles, 5 or 6 days a week. Not fast at first and not so many days a week at first. The main thing is to work at a heart rate of about 125 for a half hour or so. The keto flu is a pain in the butt, and tough to push through. Your body needs to get used to burning fat. It takes a while. It won’t like this. I’d say there are probably a bunch of new drugs that would work great, but I’d try the hard way first.
Thank you for your response. However prior to taking rapamycin, my blood glucose level was between 95 and 110, which was fine. I am unable to exercise outside due to the heat and humidity in Florida. However I do manage to play golf two or three times a week at 7 AM. Regarding weight loss, I do not need to lose weight as my weight is perfect. I’ll and now being more careful about what I eat and I am not taking rapamycin for the time being until I can see my glucose level getting back to normal. I’ll check my blood sugar level at home, and I do labs every three months
Hi
My blood sugar is now at 102 , I missed a week of Rapamycin and watched on my diet, also took Curalin which works better than Metformin for me. I have started the Rapamycin again, 3 mg a week but this time I will check my blood sugar level every 2 days , if it rises again, I won’t be taking Rapamycin any more unfortunately .
I don’t know, it bothers me that most don’t have trouble with blood sugar and Rapa. You’re taking a pretty low dose of Rapa too.
It’s nice to have a number to go with your blood sugar, but you know that number bounces all over the place. I use the accu chek by aviva and if I’m worried I may do it several times a day. I also had a cgm for a while and it was expensive and really boring because I’m mostly keto and it really didn’t move much. Also I calibrated it with the accu chek and it was always off. So what I’m getting at is that there really is not a number to go with your blood sugar. Attia even says HbA1c is no good because of genetic variance. So I see no certainty anywhere here.
I know LPS causes type 2 diabetes. Vitamin D reduces LPS by increasing an antimicrobial peptide called LL-37 among other things. So make sure you have a vitamin D of about 60 and it could help the problem a lot.
I looked through the Curalin and it looks like good stuff, but mostly convinces and helps the pancreas to make more insulin. I prefer the approach of Jason Fung. His stuff is all good, take your pick on youtube.
For adults ages 40 to 75, statins for preventing CVD or all-cause death make sense in those who have no history of CVD, but do have one or more risk factors and a 10-year CVD risk of 10% or greater—in this group, statins have at least a “moderate net benefit” and the recommendation itself is based on “moderate certainty” (Grade B).
For that same age group, with the same baseline risk and history but a lower 10-year risk (ranging from 7.5% to less than 10%), the same recommendation can be made, this time with moderate certainty and an expectation of “at least a small net benefit” (Grade C).
“although not a perfect one. Common comorbidities encountered in patients with diabetes mellitus, such as renal insufficiency, high output states (iron deficiency anaemia, haemolytic anaemia, haemoglobinopathies and pregnancy)”
I think Peter’s problem was a haemoglobinopathy, he had small cells or something. My own personal lack of faith is from my brother whose numbers were sent to 2 different labs and the results were different by a lot. I forget the specifics now, but one lab said he was in trouble and the other said he was fine. I’m sure labs are certified and standardized, and I wouldn’t know how often mistakes are made, but it’s a really sensitive marker and maybe it’s hard to measure or something.
But yes, I watch mine and go by it. I wish it was lower. I’m glad it’s available. Thanks for the article
Hi
Thank you for your feedback
I checked out Jason Fung but that won’t help me because I am 135lb and don’t want to lose any weight. I’m 5’4’’.
My glucose level, through diet has always been around 100, I had never had a reading above 112 but my glucose spiked to 134 a few days after taking 3 mg if Rapamycin. I know that this is still an experimental drug so I am now going to experiment by taking just 1 mg of Rapamycin once I get my blood sugar back under control. Then, if my BS level doesn’t spike , I will take 2 mg the following week and so on. I really want this to work as my Husband, who has no BS problems with it, will grow younger than me
WOW ! Thank you for that, we grow most of our own vegetables and have been growing a mix of sprouts on and off for about a year now, we will now grow broccoli sprouts after reading the great benefits. Thank you for that information
This is from a health article in the Daily Mail. Unfortunately, II can’t find the actual article that was referenced:
“Statins should be taken for LIFE: Heart benefits of cholesterol-busting pills are almost entirely lost if patients stop taking them in their 80s, finds study”
"Dr Runguo Wu, lead author from Queen Mary University of London, said: ‘Stopping treatment, unless advised by a doctor, does not appear to be a wise choice.’’
I did find this in my search and it suggests benefits that I didn’t know about
Beyond lipid lowering: the role of statins in vascular protection
“Although it is widely accepted that the majority of clinical benefit obtained with statins is a direct result of their lipid-lowering properties, these agents appear to display additional cholesterol-independent or pleiotropic effects on various aspects of cardiovascular disease, including improving endothelial function, decreasing vascular inflammation and enhancing plaque stability.”
So a prior article suggested starting children on statins and this one says to stay on them into your 80’s. 90’s?
That’s a lot of statins for an absolute reduction of 0.8%. Statins for a lifetime should be Pfizer’s new motto.
I am looking at statins in terms of healthspan. Healthspan not lifespan is my primary goal.
When I die I want to fall off the cliff and not spend any time in nursing homes etc.
I want my kids to say: “Oh no, dad died at the gym today while exercising”
Really my biggest fear is becoming a feeble person requiring nursing assistance etc. and becoming a burden to others.