Omega 3 for neuroprotection: EPA vs DHA?

As stated in the 2024 Dementia prevention report of the Lancet standing Commission, higher omega-3 index are associated with a decreased risk of dementia.

However, RCTs on supplementation led to mixed results (see: Alzheimer’s disease risk reduction in clinical practice: a priority in the emerging field of preventive neurology 2024).

This recent paper (VA, Mass General, OHSU, published in JAMA Network Open) suggests an explanation: ω-3 PUFA for Secondary Prevention of White Matter Lesions and Neuronal Integrity Breakdown in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 2024. Here’s their conclusion (see the paper for the whole reasoning):

Together these findings suggest that an EPA-dominant formula may provide some benefit in APOE-E4 carriers with no dementia and WMLs, and DHA-dominant formulas may benefit noncarriers of APOE-E4 with mild-to-moderate AD.

If the authors are correct, then one should:

  • Determine their APOE-E4 status
  • Do the Omega 3 Complete test to know their omega 3 index and EPA and DHA breakdown
  • Supplement in EPA and/or DHA accordingly to increase omega 3 index > 8% and serum EPA and DHA in the top quintiles?

What do you think? (poke @DrFraser :slight_smile: )

And btw, Dr Lipid holds the opposite view (but which source backs his claim?):

5 Likes

Yes, I agree, need to pursue Omega 3 index in the 8% range if no ApoE4 and if ApoE4 need to push at least to 10%.

One can split things out and favor DHA in this setting. For ApoE4’s the Horbaach DHA Supplement 1500 mg looks pretty good, and 30 days for $15 isn’t too bad.

1 Like

You might have misread my post @DrFraser (or I misunderstood you?): the paper suggests that for ApoE4 carriers EPA and not DHA should be preferred!

1 Like

I’ll review that article, and I don’t know Dr. Dayspring’s source. The preventive neurologist he was recently interviewed with seemed to agree with Dayspring’s approach, but I don’t know the science behind his recommendations. Maybe he is incorrect? Will look at when I have time in a few days (stuck in 60 hrs of ER in 5 days right now).

3 Likes

Yes, I sent the above paper to this preventive neurologist (Dr. Kellyann Niotis). I hope she’ll get back to me. Otherwise, I’m afraid that Dr. Dayspring’s & Niotis’ recommendations on this topic might be incorrect.

2 Likes

I started looking into this. The Prevent4E Trial just ended, to explore this issue.

Omega-3 Supplements Show Benefit in APOE4 Carriers

Deputy Managing Editor, MedPage Today

6–7 minutes


Meeting Coverage > CTAD

— Trial finds DHA can penetrate the brain before dementia onset

by Judy George, November 1, 2024

High-dose supplements of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid, penetrated the brain in both APOE4 carriers and non-carriers before dementia onset, the placebo-controlled PreventE4 trial showed.

The treatment did not influence hippocampal volume, said Hussein Yassine, MD, of the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. However, increases in brain DHA in both the treatment and placebo arms were associated with better cognitive measures in APOE4 carriers, Yassine reported at the Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Diseaseopens in a new tab or window annual meeting in Madrid.

“Omega-3s are good for the APOE4 brain when started before dementia symptoms,” Yassine told MedPage Today. “This is different in dementia, when APOE4 carriers have a lower increase in brain DHA after supplementation than non-carriers,” he pointed out.

“What’s novel about these findings is that the benefit was greater for those with Alzheimer’s genetic risk,” he added.

Lower blood omega-3 levels have been correlated with worse cognitive function in several observational cohorts, particularly among APOE4 carriers, but the effect of omega-3 supplementation on cognitive outcomes in clinical trials has been inconsistent, he noted.

“In general, very few studies have examined brain DHA delivery as a metric for treatment efficacy,” Yassine said.

DHA is mostly obtained from fatty fish consumption. It’s the predominant omega-3 in the brain by weight and comprises up to 40% of fatty acids in gray matter.

Earlier studies showed that the brains of young (age 35) cognitively normal APOE4 carriers were more dependent on circulating DHAopens in a new tab or window than non-APOE4 brains.

“This means that the APOE4 brain is taking more DHA from plasma into the brain for its normal biological processes,” Yassine said. “It consumes more DHA, like a specific engine that requires a specific oil to function.”

Since plasma DHA levels are largely determined by dietary intake, this finding implies vulnerability of APOE4 carriers to a low DHA diet, he noted.

PreventE4opens in a new tab or window was a double-blind, single-center trial of cognitively unimpaired individuals with at least one vascular dementia risk factor and limited seafood consumption (DHA intake less than 200 mg/day). People who used omega-3 supplements in the last 3 months were excluded. By design, half the study population had at least one APOE4 allele.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/ctad/112713

Baseline Findings of PreventE4: A Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Testing High Dose DHA in APOE4 Carriers before the Onset of Dementia

https://link.springer.com/article/10.14283/jpad.2023.77#Sec19

The explanation here appears to be that ApoE4 impairs the utilization and effectiveness of DHA more than it does of EPA, mainly because of oxidation.

The study confirmed lower plasma levels and higher oxidation rates, contributing to a shorter half-life of DHA in ApoE4 carriers.
https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/docosahexaenoic-acid-dha

More than a dozen epidemiological studies have reported that reduced levels or intake of omega-3 fatty acids or fish consumption is associated with increased risk for age-related cognitive decline or dementia such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Increased dietary consumption or blood levels of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) appear protective for AD and other dementia in multiple epidemiological studies; however, three studies suggest that the ApoE4 genotype limits protection. DHA is broadly neuroprotective via multiple mechanisms that include neuroprotective DHA metabolites, reduced arachidonic acid metabolites, and increased trophic factors or downstream trophic signal transduction. DHA is also protective against several risk factors for dementia including head trauma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. DHA is specifically protective against AD via additional mechanisms: It limits the production and accumulation of the amyloid β peptide toxin that is widely believed to drive the disease; and it also suppresses several signal transduction pathways induced by Aβ, including two major kinases that phosphorylate the microtubule associated protein tau and promote neurofibrillary tangle pathology. Based on the epidemiological and basic research data, expert panels have recommended the need for clinical trials with omega-3 fatty acids, notably DHA, for the prevention or treatment of age-related cognitive decline—with a focus on the most prevalent cause, AD. Clinical trials are underway to prevent and treat AD. Results to-date suggest that DHA may be more effective if it is begun early or used in conjunction with antioxidants.

For established AD, we are just beginning to learn how to use DHA supplements for treatment. They may not work well alone at late-stage AD, particularly in groups with high oxidative stress like ApoE4, so we can expect to combine DHA with other treatments, including antioxidants.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4019002/#S17

The rationale for testing DHA was strong. It is enriched in neuronal membranes but depleted in AD. Multiple epidemiological studies report diets rich in fish or DHA reduce AD risk, most clearly in non-apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) carriers.

For prevention or treatment, one might expect ApoE genotype-DHA interactions. Because ApoE4 accelerates pathogenesis, age-matched ApoE4 patients may have more intractable AD pathology. Further, one important target of DHA is insulin resistance [14], but drugs targeting insulin resistance (insulin or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ agonists) appears more effective at reducing cognitive deficits in ApoE3 carriers than ApoE4 carriers [15]. ApoE is a major central nervous system lipid transport protein with isoform-dependent tracking likely to impact DHA compartmentalization in the brain. Finally, ApoE4 increases oxidative stress, and with six double bonds, DHA is readily oxidized.

This raises other critical issues that need to be addressed before pursuing a future trial: dose and oxidation. The authors discuss the need to investigate potential combinations of DHA with antioxidants in AD patients, given apparent benefits with combinations of fish oil and lutein or lipoate in small trials and with antioxidants in the Souvenaid trial. Oxidation of DHA to neuroprostanes is associated with synaptic loss. Further oxidation produces a toxic end-product, 4-hydroxyhexenal, that contributes to neuron death and defective uptake of glucose by neurons and glutamate by astrocytes.

The study by Quinn and colleagues provides additional rationale to test DHA for prevention, with focus on non-ApoE4 carriers, but problems with DHA dosing and oxidation need to be addressed (particularly if an antioxidant could correct a failed ApoE4 response to DHA). Additional preclinical studies of stage-dependent efficacy and ApoE4-DHA interaction may help to clarify whether ApoE genotype affects outcomes and how this can be mitigated, possibly with antioxidants or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

https://alzres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/alzrt61#:~:text=Finally%2C%20ApoE4%20increases%20oxidative%20stress%2C%20and%20with%20six%20double%20bonds%2C%20DHA%20is%20readily%20oxidized.

Apolipoprotein ε allele 4 (APOE4) influences the metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The entorhinal cortex (EC) in the brain is affected early in Alzheimer’s disease and is rich in DHA. The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of APOE4 and DHA lipid species on the EC.

The EC is rich in DHA, and abnormal or deficient EC neural activity is implicated early in late-onset AD pathogenesis. DHA supplementation appears to restore the electrophysiology of EC neurons improving cognitive behaviors such as object recognition (10). Physiologically, the EC feeds into the hippocampus. When the EC functions abnormally, the hippocampus is negatively impacted physiologically and functionally, thus impairing memory performance (11). Therefore, it is plausible that the EC thickness can be used as a surrogate for DHA supplementation brain efficiency.

The DHA Brain Delivery Pilot trial tested the effect of APOE4 on omega-3 brain delivery, revealing differences in total DHA and EPA CSF levels by genotype. Here, APOE4 had the strongest effects on the DHA-containing TG lipid pools, typically found in larger particles (VLDL and chylomicrons). The increase in DHA within TGs was suppressed in APO E4 carriers compared to noncarriers in CSF and plasma. One mechanism for this observation is the increased oxidation of DHA-containing TG particles in APOE4 cells. Together, these findings suggest that APOE4 causes either deficient accretion of PUFAs or increased clearance, and this may diminish the effects of supplemental omega-3 on the brain.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10230261/#sec3

.

4 Likes

And here Tom Dayspring gives a true master class in lipidology on ApoE. When you thoroughly understand this, you’ve earned your amateur Lipidologist badge and you’re ready to set up your research lab in the basement. I need to watch it 10 more times, stopping on every slide to look up all the terms and processes.

https://www.lipid.org/media/journalclub/selaspeaks03/hotfix.html

4 Likes

Thanks. So it’s very complex…

1 Like

I don’t understand why the paper is discussing results from other papers.

As far as I understand, the study tested the following:

Intervention Three-year treatment with 1.65 g of ω-3 PUFA (975 mg of EPA and 650 mg of DHA) vs a soybean oil placebo matched for taste, smell, and appearance.

This is what I think they mean with EPA-dominant formula.

In the discussion they mention DHA didn’t work for Alzheimer’s, but these papers had different endpoints which might be harder to detect an effect for, how does for example an endpoint on cognition compare with “WML accumulation”? The latter seems like mechanistic speculation, and I think MRI scans can be really flawed.

I think it would be more useful to look at MR and observational trials to figure out the optimal level and supplementation until there’s actually some massive trial on a good endpoint. But I don’t know. The important thing is it’s low risk: if you get depression or low energy from DHA, then it doesn’t work for you. So then I think you have to try something else, no matter how useful it might be. Otherwise it’s like a statin user who keep taking statins despite having muscle pains, it makes no sense.

I think for E4 carriers reducing dementia risk is most important because we have solved cardiovascular disease, at least atherosclerosis, if we got aware of lipids earlier rather than later. Keeping the brain healthy is important for a future with head transplants into brainless or headless clones. I think BJ mentioned this at some point, the body can be replaced maybe one day so it’s important to keep the brain healthy.

If DrFraser says %10 Omega-3 index and it’s low risk for E4, why not? (Worst case is developing afib later on, but can take anti-coagulant for that to reduce stroke risk).

3 Likes

Why can’t they?

Yes, in the literature, EPA-dominant usually means >60% EPA.

For omega 3 index and DHA: the higher the better in association studies. In MR I don’t know. And in RCTs: mixed results.

Of course, that’s why I stopped, but I want to understand the cause to be able to adjust accordingly:

  • Is it DHA or EPA? (I’ll test EPA only soon so I’ll see…)
  • Is it the dose?
  • Is it the brand/quality? (I might try pharma-grade Lovaza/Omacor or Vascepa/Vazkepa)
  • Is it the other types of omega 3 (neither DHA nor EPA) present in the supplement?

For sure a high omega 3 index is good. But the question is: how to get there safely (mood, AFib, etc.)? It seems that the answer might depend on your baseline serum levels and your APOE variants. I guess, as of today, the only option is trial and error…

2 Likes

@adssx I’m not sure that paper has showed that a high DHA formulation is not superior, unless I’m not understanding. It looks like they used a product that had both EPA and DHA something like 900+mg EPA/600+mg DHA. Unless we have a similar trial with high DHA/EPA ratio vs. a high EPA/DHA ratio I think it is hard to say. Additionally, their formulation was minimally EPA predominant, but not an overwhelming amount.
Until more information, logic, and smack downs from @adssx on this (and I’m willing to be taught and learn) my approach will be to make sure there is adequate of both EPA and DHA and for ApoE4’s get the index to 10%.

4 Likes

Yes it’s not about the main finding of their paper itself but how they analyze it in might of previous papers and conclude “Together these findings suggest that an EPA-dominant formula may provide some benefit in APOE-E4 carriers with no dementia and WMLs, and DHA-dominant formulas may benefit noncarriers of APOE-E4 with mild-to-moderate AD.”

Nothing is really clear to me so far but I agree with you: high omega 3 index is the way. How you get there might require some trial and error…

2 Likes

This is a very interesting topic! What appears is that also starting earlier (prevention) is the solution.
Unfortunately, for s small % of the population, like me. Omega-3 supplements can trigger Atrial Fibrillation. Which is very difficult to understand the mechanisms in a population without cardiac problems.
Great topic @adssx and good points @DrFraser

2 Likes

Which doses of EPA and DHA did you use?

Some papers suggests that DHA lowers the atrial fibrillation risk while EPA increases it:

So, have you tried DHA only omega 3? Or low-dose EPA?

1 Like

I have tried multiple times to address this issue, but I keep getting similar results. I know this because I have a Holter monitor that I use during sleep when I experience atrial fibrillation (AF).

At one point, I was taking 2010 mg of Omega-3, which included 1200 mg of EPA (as noted in 800 DHA). I also experimented with pure 2g of EPA.

I will check the research papers, and try to find only DHA in Europe. Thank you for that information.

The cellular mechanisms involved still intrigue me. I have a theory that Omega-3 might increase the parasympathetic tone, which unfortunately can be proarrhythmic in the atrium. This could potentially shorten the refractory period and lead to more incidents of AF.

1 Like