Hazel Szeto, SS-31 peptide, the World's First FDA-Approved Mitochondria-targeted Drug (Longevity Summit, 2025)

Hi Mitofocused and welcome.

I felt like SS-31 helped with my ADD symptoms….the focus and motivation to get things done.

Having said that, I can’t be sure it wasn’t placebo or something else.

I stopped taking it when ‘life happened’ and decided to take that opportunity to take a longer break with the goal of starting again to see if I notice a change. I’ve had a couple of false starts, but I have been very lazy and have not had the oomph to inject daily … ha, if only I was taking SS-31 :).

Now I’ll know to check out my oura stats when I start up regularly again to see if I notice anything.

I’m thrilled for you that you are noticing an effect so quickly!!! I wish you continued success!

Maybe I start back today… you have motivated me.

1 Like

Thank you for pointing me in that direction. I will read up about it.

I’ve had a very extensive workup so may already have the gene analysis. What should I be wary of before taking it?

I have an Apple Watch and have just looked at the monthly view of how they have changed. It’s very small changes and could of course be secondary to something else.

I definitely understand the stopping and starting. It’s so hard to commit to something long term especially if it’s unclear if it’s helping or not and the barrier is high (sourcing, injecting etc).

I didn’t include subjective changes in the initial comment because I wasn’t sure how to really evaluate them. I will say that I feel like an improved mood on it with less lows and less anxiety. But that could also be because I’m sleeping better and have less pain.

Good luck with the restart and I hope it gives you the same benefits you got before!

I’d start with this thread.

1 Like

Is ergothioneine use related to TMAO? Caught my attention because I take quite a bit since I get it just for some effort kind of like gardening. And my TMAO was very recently tested off the chart High. I was doing several dumb things and it’s probably just my gut microbiome. I’ll keep testing. Just wondered whether you know something my AI doesn’t.

2 Likes

Yes, see the previous post (just above yours) and follow the link. Rapadmin kindly brought this to our attention recently.

Wow, thanks I didn’t catch that the first time through. This is possibly part of my problem. My AI brought me this:

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/15/7/819?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Singapore, with mostly chinese subjects. They say no, but I’ll be watching mine from here on out.

2 Likes

Oh that’s great and reassuring to see and is a brand new study published after this thread was started, thanks for sharing!

But, the other thing to be potentially concerned about is the genetic variant (which appear all too common) that increases ergothioneine uptake into tissues and could make it potentially harmful if supplemented in large amounts.

I injected 20 mg x 10 days + 10 mg x 15 days of SS-31. I did not notice anything. An optimistic hypothesis is that my mitochondria are in too good condition to make any effect noticeable. I missed making any tests.

I might consider another try. 40 mg per day as per the dose for Barth and simultaneously taking intranasal Orexin-A on the possibility that a lack of this could prevent effects of SS-31, as detailed in the thread on Orexin.

3 Likes

You might be right.

1 Like

I would think at the doses you have tried that your conclusion is correct. Your mitochondria are likely healthy and probably won’t benefit from going even higher.

To be honest, I find that hard to believe. Is it even possible for anyone over the age of 65 or 70 (Ulf, I forget how old you are exactly) to not have significantly degraded mitochondria? Ulf, no doubt about, you are in great shape and doing well (much better than most people your age, or even much younger).

But… I would still think that even for people in good shape the mitochondria would be significantly degraded, and if their cardiolipin membranes were returned to functional youth, that you’d feel a significant benefit.

I wonder if the dose might be too low? Or perhaps there is a “wrong order” in the peptide delivered?

See this type of research, which is part of my thinking: Rust Never Sleeps: Why Your Mitochondria May Be Running on Half-Empty Vitamin Tanks by Age 50

1 Like

Nothing in that article about cardiolipin.

Since SS 31 only does 1 thing, it is quite possible that the 1 thing is not an issue for aged people whole live a healthy lifestyle… and there are many other aspects of mito disfunction besides the cardiolipin layer that SS 31 cannot fix as outlined in the article referenced.

SS-31, The Peptide That Peels Parkinson’s Rogue Protein Off Cell Membranes

Researchers at Imperial College London report that SS-31 (elamipretide), a four amino acid peptide already approved by the FDA for the ultra-rare mitochondrial disease Barth syndrome, competes directly with alpha-synuclein for space on negatively charged lipid membranes. Using single-molecule fluorescence methods, the team showed SS-31 strips alpha-synuclein off synthetic synaptic-like vesicles at sub-stoichiometric concentrations, slows and blunts lipid-triggered amyloid fibril formation, reduces uptake of toxic alpha-synuclein oligomers into neuroblastoma cells, and partially restores mitochondrial respiration and cell viability in cells poisoned with those oligomers. The work is entirely test-tube and cell culture based, with no animal or human data, and the authors themselves caution that the mitochondrial rescue may reflect a generic mitochondrial benefit rather than anything specific to alpha-synuclein.

Parkinson’s disease is defined by clumps of a protein called alpha-synuclein. What is less widely appreciated is that this protein does not misfold in a vacuum. It normally binds to the fatty membranes of synaptic vesicles, and that binding is precisely what kickstarts the misfolding. Membrane contact forces the floppy, unstructured protein into a partly helical shape that acts as a seed for the beta-sheet aggregates that go on to kill dopamine neurons. Block the binding and you may block the seeding.

That is the big idea this paper tests, and the tool it uses is unusual. SS-31, also called elamipretide, is a synthetic tetrapeptide that has spent two decades being developed as a mitochondrial drug. It carries a net positive charge and homes in on cardiolipin, a negatively charged lipid concentrated in the inner mitochondrial membrane, where it improves electron transport and mops up reactive oxygen. In September 2025 it became the first drug approved specifically to target mitochondria, for Barth syndrome.

The Imperial team reasoned that a positively charged peptide with a taste for anionic lipids ought to compete with alpha-synuclein, which anchors to membranes through its positively charged N-terminal region binding the same negative surfaces. It does. Fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy both showed SS-31 displacing alpha-synuclein from model vesicles in a dose-dependent way, with half-maximal displacement at roughly a 0.7 to 1 peptide to protein ratio. Circular dichroism confirmed the displaced protein loses its membrane-induced helical structure.

Downstream, the consequences look useful. Lipid-accelerated fibril formation was delayed by tens of hours and reduced in amount. Electron microscopy showed altered fibril architecture. In human neuroblastoma cells, SS-31 cut internalisation of alpha-synuclein oligomers by up to half, and restored basal and maximal mitochondrial respiration that the oligomers had suppressed.

The caveats are substantial. This is a mechanism paper, not an efficacy paper. Everything happens in artificial vesicles or immortalised cancer-derived cell lines. Above 100 micromolar, SS-31 itself became toxic. And SS-31 improved cell health even without alpha-synuclein present, which makes it hard to separate a specific anti-synuclein effect from a general mitochondrial tonic. Still, it is a plausible new mechanism for a drug already in humans, which is a shorter path than most.

Insights

This is a chemistry and cell culture study with no animals, no patients, no dosing, and no lifespan data.
What the numbers do say, translated: in cells poisoned with alpha-synuclein oligomers, viability fell from 100 to about 46 percent. Adding the best dose of SS-31 lifted it to about 60 percent. In plain terms the peptide recovered roughly a quarter of what was lost, an effect size of about 0.8 standard deviations, which counts as moderate to large but is nowhere near a rescue. Mitochondrial respiration recovered more convincingly, with effect sizes near 1.8 to 2.1 standard deviations, meaning the treated and untreated groups barely overlap.

The transferable idea is that membrane lipid composition is upstream of protein aggregation. Anything that alters synaptic membrane charge and fluidity is a legitimate target class. Watch this space rather than acting on it.

Context and Source

  • Open Access Paper: Therapeutic Peptide SS-31 Modulates Membrane Binding and Aggregation of Alpha-Synuclein and Restores Impaired Mitochondrial Function
  • Authors: Ewelina Stefaniak, Beiyuan Cui, Xucheng Yan, Kexin Sun, Xiangyu Teng, Liming Ying
  • Institution: National Heart and Lung Institute, Department of Metabolism Digestion and Reproduction, and Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London
  • Country: United Kingdom
  • Journal: Chemical Biology and Drug Design (Wiley), 2026
  • Impact evaluation: The impact score of this journal is 3.3, evaluated against a typical high-end range of 0 to 60+ for top general science, therefore this is a Low impact journal. For context, it sits in the ordinary working range for specialist chemical biology titles, roughly Q2 to Q3, and is not a venue where field-changing claims are typically vetted. This does not invalidate the biophysics, which is technically competent, but it should temper expectations about scrutiny of the cell biology claims.
3 Likes

SS-31 ADHD connection

2 Likes

Interesting. Do we have PK studies? To know more about the perfect dosage ? And make sure we are well below the 100uM :slight_smile:

Not sure PK would tell us a “perfect” dose as we all respond to things a bit differently.

Not sure a perfect dose is required but an adequate dose that would be higher than the perfect dose is most likely required. Low dose has been studied and indicated no benefit for mito’s and very high doses have been studied in humans with no issues and greater benefit

From what I’ve read since I started taking SS 31 is that anything less than 5.0 mg per dose is close to useless for mitos and that higher doses have a better result.

People can easily tolerate 60.0 mg daily doses for extended periods of time. The prescribed dose for Barths is 40.0mg per day for the rest of their lives.

I do 10mg per day for 10 days 2 months on, 1 month off.

BUT I started with 10.0mg twice a day (20mg) for 10 days to get closer to what is used in the published human studies.

Test tubes are great but humans are the gold standard :slight_smile:

SS 31 - elamipretide, provide mechanistics, clinic.pdf (1.3 MB)

1 Like

That’s very interesting.

Tremendous fatigue, I have been using it for 2 months now and cant get past 1mg. I have to take a nap if I take it, it just wipes me out.