92-Year-Old Physicist's Plan To Become The Oldest Human Ever | Dr John Cramer - YouTube

Gemini:

Here is a tidy transcript, summary, and critique of the interview with Dr. John Cramer regarding the Mitrix Mitochondrial Transplantation Trial.

1. Tidy Transcript

Introduction: The Energy Crisis of Aging
Dr. John Cramer: The underlying theory behind all of this is that aging occurs because mitochondrial DNA is particularly vulnerable and becomes progressively damaged. Mitochondria are the principal suppliers of energy to the body. If you disable more of your mitochondria and their DNA, it creates an energy crisis; the power gets shut off. Essentially, all other hallmarks of aging listed in scientific literature can be traced back to this energy shortage. The question is: if you make that energy shortage go away by replacing damaged mitochondria with healthy ones, what happens?

Host: Hello Dr. Kramer. You are an Emeritus Professor at the University of Washington, researching nuclear and particle physics. You have written science fiction novels and a book on quantum mechanics. Now, at 92, you have turned your mind to longevity and are participating in the Mitrix mitochondrial transplantation trial. Welcome to Modern Healthspan.

Dr. Cramer: Thank you very much for inviting me.

How the Mitochondrial Transplant Trial Works
Host: Can you start by explaining the trial you are participating in?

Dr. Cramer: It involves several steps. The initial step is a safety trial. We will inject small amounts of my own matching mitochondria under the skin and into fat cells to ensure there are no unanticipated negative side effects. While mitochondria have been injected into humans to cure specific diseases, nothing like this has been done for aging.

I will undergo extensive testing before and during the process. We start small, likely in early January. Then, we will proceed to use larger amounts, eventually trying to replace about 25% of the mitochondria in my body with healthy mitochondria grown externally in a bioreactor.

Host: So, they take mitochondria from you, grow them, and reinject them?

Dr. Cramer: Yes. The details of how they purify them and ensure the DNA is pristine are proprietary, but the goal is to provide mitochondria in the best possible shape. For reference, about 1% of your body weight is mitochondria. If I weigh 50kg, that is 500g of mitochondria. To replace a significant fraction, we need a large quantity produced externally, as you cannot get that volume from a donor.

The End Goal and Theory
Host: What is the end goal?

Dr. Cramer: We want to answer several questions. The theory is that repair mechanisms in the body, which keep you young, require significant cellular energy. When energy drops due to mitochondrial damage, the body conserves energy by shutting down these repair mechanisms. This produces the symptoms of aging.

We want to know: if we replace bad mitochondria with good ones, do the repair mechanisms come back online? Do senescent cells get cleared? Do telomeres get longer? Is there epigenetic reprogramming? It may be like replacing a laptop battery—if the laptop has other broken parts, a new battery might not fix everything. However, preliminary data suggests that restoring energy triggers many beneficial effects.

I am 92. In roughly 28 years, I will be pushing the “aging limit” of ~120 years. If this works, I might become the oldest human on the planet. That is a goal, not an expectation, but at my age, it is worth a try.

Measurements and Biomarkers
Host: What will be measured to track progress?

Dr. Cramer: Mitrix has developed a way to directly scan mitochondrial DNA for damage. My saliva sample showed mitochondria in relatively good shape, but my kidney cells (from urine) showed significant damage—about 19% damage. 25% is where things get critical.

We will also look at:

  • VO2 Max: A direct measure of oxygen consumption by mitochondria.
  • Telomere Length: To see if they lengthen.
  • Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number: Using microbubble PCR to count copies per cell.
  • Standard Health Markers: Heart, liver, and blood health.
  • Whole Body MRI: To see structural changes.
  • Functional Tests: Physical and mental performance, muscle mass vs. fat.

Why Damage Accelerates at Age 65
Dr. Cramer: There is a German study that looked at mitochondrial DNA in muscle tissue. They found that between ages 20 and 65, deletion mutations rise exponentially with a doubling time of about 11 years. However, after age 65, the slope changes dramatically, and the doubling time drops to 3 years. This means every three years, you have twice as much damage.

My theory is that this correlates with mitophagy (the process of clearing bad mitochondria). Mitophagy is energy-expensive. When energy levels drop below a certain threshold—around age 65—the body can no longer afford efficient mitophagy, leading to a rapid accumulation of damage.

The Procedure Protocol
Host: How will the injections happen?

Dr. Cramer: A possible scenario is that I receive infusions of about 20 grams at a time, building up to a total of roughly 200 grams over a year. This would replace about 25% of my body’s mitochondria. We hope that after a few infusions, we will see measurable results.

Host: How do the new mitochondria find their way to the cells?

Dr. Cramer: Evidence from animal studies suggests mitochondria go where they are needed. Cells that need energy “wave a red flag,” and injected mitochondria are distributed automatically.

Dr. Cramer’s Personal Protocol (Rapamycin & HBOT)
Host: You mentioned taking Rapamycin. What has been your experience?

Dr. Cramer: I take 6mg of Rapamycin every 14 days. Tests indicated that between May and November, my muscle mass increased and other markers improved, despite no changes in my exercise routine (walking the dog). I believe Rapamycin is responsible.

I also did extensive Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)—about 23 hours in May. Afterward, I felt very energetic, which led me to write my new book. I suspect HBOT allows mitochondria to build a temporary stockpile of ATP, improving function for a few months.

Conclusion
Dr. Cramer: My book, How to Live Much Longer: The Mitochondrial DNA Connection, explains this theory in detail and should be out in early 2026 via Springer. This treatment is likely 10 years away for the general public. In the meantime, I recommend interventions that support mitophagy, such as Rapamycin, Metformin, and senolytics, to “tide you over” until mitochondrial replacement is available.


2. Summary

Topic: The Mitrix Mitochondrial Transplantation Trial and the Mitochondrial Theory of Aging.
Guest: Dr. John Cramer, 92-year-old Emeritus Professor of Physics (University of Washington).

Core Argument:
Dr. Cramer argues that aging is fundamentally an energy crisis. As we age, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) accumulates “deletion mutations” much faster than nuclear DNA. This reduces cellular energy (ATP). The body responds by shutting down energy-expensive repair mechanisms (like autophagy and DNA repair) to survive. This shutdown manifests as the “hallmarks of aging” (senescence, inflammation, telomere shortening).

The Solution (The Mitrix Trial):
The proposed solution is Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy (MRT).

  • The Method: Extract the patient’s own mitochondria, purify and multiply them in a bioreactor, and re-inject them into the body (Autologous Transplant).
  • The Goal: Replace ~25% of the body’s mitochondria with healthy, high-functioning units.
  • The Theory: Restoring energy levels will allow the body’s natural repair mechanisms to turn back on, effectively reversing or halting aging.

Key Insights:

  • The “Age 65” Cliff: Dr. Cramer cites data suggesting mitochondrial damage doubles every 11 years until age 65, after which it accelerates to doubling every 3 years. He posits this is due to the failure of mitophagy caused by a lack of energy.
  • Current Status: Dr. Cramer is “Patient Zero” (or technically number two) for safety trials beginning early next year.
  • Bridge Strategy: Until this therapy is available, Cramer utilizes Rapamycin (6mg every 2 weeks), Senolytics (Dasatinib/Quercetin), and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) to maintain mitochondrial function.

3. Critique

Strengths:

  • First-Principles Thinking: As a physicist, Dr. Cramer applies a “follow the energy” approach to biology. This offers a refreshing, reductive clarity compared to the complex biochemical pathways usually discussed in longevity. The theory that the body “browns out” repair systems to save energy is intuitive and compelling.
  • High-Risk, High-Reward: Unlike marginal interventions (supplements, diet), this is a “moonshot” therapy. If it works, it addresses a root cause rather than symptoms.
  • Personal Credibility: At 92, Dr. Cramer is cognitively sharp, articulate, and physically active. His willingness to be a test subject adds significant weight to his belief in the science.
  • Specifics of Protocol: The interview provides concrete details rarely heard in early trials, such as the specific doubling rates of mtDNA damage and the proposed dosage (200g of mitochondria).

Weaknesses & Limitations:

  • Speculative Leap: While mitochondrial transplants have worked for acute injuries (heart attack, stroke) and in mice, systemic replacement in humans for aging is unproven. It is unknown if the body will reject the volume, if the mitochondria will properly integrate, or if the “energy crisis” is the only bottleneck.
  • The “Battery” Analogy Flaw: Dr. Cramer admits that putting a new battery in a broken laptop doesn’t fix the broken screen. If aging has caused irreversible structural damage (cross-linked proteins, accumulation of junk), energy alone may not fix it.
  • Proprietary “Black Box”: The method of growing mitochondria in a bioreactor without them mutating is the “secret sauce” of Mitrix. Without peer-reviewed transparency on how they achieve this (since mitochondria mutate fast), it remains a technological question mark.
  • Cost and Accessibility: Dr. Cramer acknowledges this will be expensive and initially available only to the wealthy, though he hopes to research ways to lower costs.

Verdict:
This is a fascinating look at the bleeding edge of longevity science. Dr. Cramer provides a compelling, unified theory of aging that centers on bioenergetics. While highly experimental, the trial represents a necessary shift from treating symptoms to addressing the cellular engine of life. The interview is a must-watch for those interested in mitochondria, Rapamycin, and radical life extension.

10 Likes

well what does david marcinek (also at UWash) think?

https://sites.uw.edu/marcinek/people-2/david-marcinek/

Good question - I’d like to know what all the top mitochondria scientists (Martin Picard), etc. think of this approach.

Have there been any mouse studies on this? Seems strange that they are going directly to humans if this hasn’t already been proven in mice or other animal models.

1 Like

They have done other experiments

Gemini Deep Research analysis on the topic:

Critical Analysis: Mitochondrial Transfer for Healthspan and Lifespan Extension

Executive Summary

The hypothesis that infusing young or healthy mitochondria can extend mammalian lifespan is biologically plausible but currently relies on nuanced data that is often oversimplified in popular media. Scientific evidence does not support the idea that injected mitochondria simply “refuel” aged cells throughout the body like replacing batteries.

Instead, the most rigorous research suggests two distinct mechanisms:

  1. Systemic Signaling: Young mitochondrial components (specifically within extracellular vesicles) act as hormonal signals, instructing aged tissues to repair themselves.
  2. Acute Rescue: Direct mitochondrial transplantation can rescue dying tissue (e.g., during heart attacks or sepsis) by temporarily restoring bioenergetics, but this is a localized acute treatment, not a systemic anti-aging “cure” in the traditional sense.

The strongest evidence for actual lifespan extension (22.7%) comes from Small Extracellular Vesicles (sEVs) carrying genetic instructions, not from the transplantation of whole mitochondria themselves.


1. The Lifespan Data: Vesicles vs. Whole Organelles

It is crucial to distinguish between transferring whole mitochondria and transferring mitochondrial signals (extracellular vesicles).

The “Signal” Approach (Strongest Lifespan Evidence)

The most compelling lifespan data comes from a 2024 study published in Nature Aging. Researchers did not inject whole mitochondria, but rather small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) derived from the plasma of young mice.

  • The Finding: Weekly injections of young sEVs extended the median lifespan of aged mice by 22.7%.
  • The Mechanism: The vesicles did not provide energy directly. Instead, they delivered a cargo of microRNAs (miRNAs) that stimulated the recipient cells to produce PGC-1alpha. PGC-1alpha is a master transcription factor that forces the aged cell to build its own new mitochondria (biogenesis).
  • Critical Takeaway: This was a “software update” for the aged cells, not a “hardware replacement.”

The “Whole Mitochondria” Approach (Mixed/Preclinical Data)

Evidence for extending the lifespan of healthy wild-type mice via whole mitochondrial injection is less definitive and mostly focuses on disease rescue.

  • Sepsis and Immune Senescence: Preclinical data (including preprints from startups like Mitrix Bio) suggests that injecting “Mitlets” (mitochondria encased in platelet vesicles) can reverse immune senescence and improve survival in models of bacterial sepsis and flu. This is “healthspan” in the context of resisting acute stress, rather than extending maximum biological lifespan in healthy animals.

2. Healthspan and Organ-Specific Reversal

While systemic life extension is still being debated, the ability of mitochondrial transfer to reverse specific organ aging is well-documented. However, the mechanism is often counter-intuitive.

The “Liver-Brain Axis” (Treating the Brain via the Liver)

A major hurdle for mitochondrial therapy is the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB). Large organelles cannot cross it. Yet, intravenous (IV) mitochondrial injection improves cognition in Alzheimer’s models (5XFAD mice).

  • The Mechanism: Research reveals a “Liver-Serum-Brain” axis. IV-injected mitochondria are sequestered by the liver, not the brain. The liver processes these organelles and releases metabolic byproducts (carnosine, putrescine) into the blood. These small molecules can cross the BBB and provide neuroprotection.
  • Critical Assessment: The therapy works, but indirectly. Claims that IV mitochondria “enter brain cells” are scientifically inaccurate based on biodistribution data.

Reversing Sarcopenia (Muscle Aging)

In skeletal muscle, direct local injection is effective because it bypasses delivery hurdles.

  • Study: A 2024 Biomolecules study showed that injecting young mitochondria into the legs of 24-month-old mice (equivalent to 70-year-old humans) increased ATP levels by 51% and muscle endurance.
  • Limitations: This requires local injection. It is not a scalable solution for treating whole-body frailty unless a systemic delivery vector is perfected.

3. The “DAMPs” Problem: Safety and Inflammation

The most significant risk in this field is the immune response. Mitochondria are evolutionarily derived from bacteria. To the immune system, a damaged mitochondrion looks exactly like a bacterial infection.

  • The Danger: If mitochondria are damaged during isolation or injection, they release Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs), such as cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA). This triggers the NLRP3 inflammasome, causing severe inflammation—the exact opposite of the desired anti-aging effect.
  • The “Fresh vs. Frozen” Constraint: Studies consistently show that freshly isolated mitochondria are safe and non-immunogenic, while frozen/thawed mitochondria often lose membrane integrity and become toxic. This presents a massive logistical challenge for scaling this into a clinical “drug.”

4. Conclusion: Hype vs. Reality

The Claim The Reality
“Injecting mitochondria extends life.” Partially True. sEVs (vesicles) with genetic instructions extend mouse lifespan (22.7%). Whole mitochondria extend survival in disease models (sepsis, ischemia) but max lifespan data for healthy animals is lacking.
“Mitochondria go where they are needed.” False. IV-injected mitochondria get trapped in the lungs, liver, and spleen. They do not naturally home to the brain or heart in significant numbers without direct injection.
“It’s a simple fuel refill.” False. It is a complex signaling intervention. The benefit comes from stimulating the body’s repair pathways (like PGC-1alpha) or metabolic shifts in the liver, not just burning exogenous fuel.

Final Verdict: Mitochondrial transfer is a potent therapeutic candidate for acute injury rescue (heart attack, stroke, sepsis) and specific tissue regeneration. Its utility as a systemic “longevity serum” depends on solving the delivery problem (getting them past the liver) and managing the immune risks of DAMPs. The sEV (vesicle) approach currently holds more promise for systemic aging than whole organelle transplantation.

2 Likes

Maybe I’ll quit the gym and buy a dog.

2 Likes

From Tom Benson’s presentations, the number of mitochondria are so greatly reduced in old age that any repair or internally generated increase would still leave a severe shortage. If your mitochondria are perfect but few, where does that leave you?

The Mitrix infusions would be meant to bring volumes back to youthful levels. As mentioned above, this would presuppose that the mitochondria made in the bioreactor were free of defects and stayed that way through the infusion process.

Kind of related, Harold Katcher’s E5 also needs to be infused in big volumes.

Does anybody else show muscle increase from 6 mg Rapa twice a month without exercise?

1 Like

No, but it certainly slows down the rate of muscle loss when you’re not exercising.

1 Like