Testosterone Shots: SubQ or IM?

I asked aristotle.science which was better: SubQ or IM shots for testosterone. SubQ was the answer. If you’re currently using TRT which do you prefer and why?

The Core Finding: SubQ Shows Potential Advantages

A 2022 study in The Journal of Urology comparing 234 hypogonadal men treated with intramuscular testosterone cypionate versus subcutaneous testosterone enanthate (both at 100 mg weekly) found that subcutaneous injection was associated with lower post-therapy estradiol and hematocrit levels compared to intramuscular injections. The researchers concluded that subcutaneous testosterone “represents an effective testosterone delivery system with a potentially preferable safety profile over intramuscular testosterone cypionate”.

This matters clinically because:

  • Elevated hematocrit is the most common reason men must reduce TRT dose or donate blood

  • Elevated estradiol is the most common reason men are prescribed aromatase inhibitors they may not need

Head-to-Head Comparison

Parameter Subcutaneous Intramuscular Clinical Significance
Testosterone levels achieved Equivalent Equivalent No difference
Peak testosterone Lower peaks Higher peaks IM spikes may drive more side effects
Trough testosterone Higher troughs Lower troughs SubQ more stable between injections
Estradiol levels Lower post-therapy Higher post-therapy SubQ may reduce need for AI
Hematocrit elevation Lower Higher SubQ may reduce polycythemia risk
Pain/discomfort Less More SubQ uses smaller needles, shallower depth
Self-administration ease Easier Harder (some sites) SubQ abdomen is accessible; IM glutes require twisting

Testosterone injection methods comparison

Why the Difference in Estradiol and Hematocrit?

The mechanism appears to be pharmacokinetic. Intramuscular injection creates a rapid absorption curve with testosterone levels spiking within 24-48 hours, often reaching supraphysiological peaks above 1,500 ng/dL on standard doses. One study found serum estradiol increased 1.7-fold within 24 hours of IM injection, driven by the testosterone spike overwhelming the aromatase enzyme system.

Subcutaneous injection creates a flatter absorption curve because adipose tissue has a less dense capillary network than muscle, so testosterone absorbs more gradually. A 52-week study of 150 hypogonadal men using weekly subcutaneous testosterone enanthate found that 92.7% achieved target testosterone levels with “small peak and trough fluctuations”.

https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002301

I prefer subQ, but even that increased my hematocrit too much so I switched back to a compounded cream from MedQuest which works amazingly well but is more expensive than injectable testosterone.

SubQ for me causes lumps. IM doesn’t.

SubQ increase my estradiol level way more. I prefer IM, daily, with insulin syringes

How is it possible to do it with insulin syringes? Aren’t they too small and Isn’t T oil based?

It’s indeed oil based. I warm the oil in hot water then I use a 31G insulin syringe to draw 0.05mL a day, so about 85mg/semaine of test C as TRT

1 Like

I did subQ with oil based solutions using 27G insulin needles. I liked it more than intramuscular injections. I never needed to warm the oil although that is a good idea.

Currently I am using oral T from Kyzatrex that you take twice a day. I find that even better although it is more expensive. It is especially good at raising free testosterone.