Stanford Center on Longevity Magazine

#1

561xauto
660xauto
Hi,

When people hear that the Stanford Center on Longevity has a vision for redesigning our world so that 100-year-lives can be healthier and more satisfying at every age, their first response is often “But who would want to live to 100?!” The fact is that more people than ever are reaching this once-rare milestone, and, as we found in the Center’s New Map of Life initiative, the future of aging is going to be nothing like its past.

Today we are launching Stanford Center on Longevity Magazine to show you what’s changing. Each month, we will share original reporting, insights, and analysis to advance your understanding of the longevity-ready world taking shape. In our first issue, you’ll meet innovators putting New Map of Life principles in action by redesigning high school to graduate lifelong learners and transforming the ways doctors and patients communicate. If you don’t know what “Exposome” means and how it affects your longevity, or whether you have the financial literacy to be secure for a century of good living, you are about to find out.

We hope you enjoy the first issue of SCL Magazine!
READ MORE

IN THIS ISSUE

FEATURE STORY | Building a ‘Learning’ Society for 100-Year Lives
LONGEVITY LITERACY | Beyond DNA: How Your ‘Exposome’ Shapes Your Health
GAME CHANGER | Putting Humanity Back in in Healthcare Through AI
ARE YOU LONGEVITY-READY? | Cents and Sensibility: Test Your Money Smarts
IN THE NEWS | A Vaccine Policy’s Surprising Link to Dementia Treatment
@SCL | 2025 Design Challenge Winners, and 8 New SCL Research Fellows

1 Like
#2

Are people in the longevity area for immortality, or are they just interested in 100, 120 years? What’s the vibes on the ground?

When, if ever, will Stanford Center on Longevity say “Redesigning our world for infinite lifespans”?

#3

There are different segments… The Vitalist group (started by Nathan Cheng and Adam Gries) is firmly in the immortality camp.

Most of the Biotech / science field is in the “lets focus on moderate goals of 10, 20, 30 healthy years”

Then you have institutions like Stanford that are focused on broadening the current max (e.g. 90 to 100 years) to a broader percent of the population, making it healthy, and enjoyable and financially viable…

We need some demonstrable and validated longevity therapeutics before any of this changes… but eventually…

4 Likes