@RobTuck Based on my interview with Mark Tarnopolsky MD PhD, mitochondria expert, I wouldn’t bother. He says exercise is the only reliable mechanism to build healthy mitochondria.
Edit: he also said don’t bother with Urolithin A.
@RobTuck Based on my interview with Mark Tarnopolsky MD PhD, mitochondria expert, I wouldn’t bother. He says exercise is the only reliable mechanism to build healthy mitochondria.
Edit: he also said don’t bother with Urolithin A.
If you really want it, liftmode seems like a trusted brand on reddit.
Thanks for the replies. I had wondered myself whether it was worth it given that I maintain decent exercise protocols with hiking and weightlifting. My speculative reason for considering Urolithin A was to see if it might reduce my recovery interval. Now approaching 80, I find that it takes at least two full days and sometimes three to recover from a strenuous one-hour mountain hike. I can hike more often but the returns appear to me negative.
It seems to me that Urolithin is a poor man’s Rapamycin, except that Rapamycin has much more data and actually costs less per year. Am I missing something?
@RobTuck I would think lowering inflammation in general would help with recovery. Also making sure you are getting enough nutrients to repair and adapt. Plus be sure to ramp up slowly so the recovery isn’t so long that you lose the adaptation benefit. Once in a while for an adventure is worth it no doubt.
My inflammatory markers are about as low as they go @Joseph_Lavelle. I have experimented for several years to find ways to shorten beneficial exercise increased recovery time. The results have been modest. (This has been quite a contrast to my competitive running days where I trained from 20 to 60 miles a week.)
I think the length of my beneficial recovery cycles is dictated by at least one factor for certain and perhaps others I am unaware of. My LDH levels have been subnormal (95 IU/L is a typical reading) going back to my first test of it in the 1980’s. I have about 20 readings over that time span. I think low LDH and/or its genetic causes plays a role, including that my Type I muscles are atypically stronger at the end of intensive exercise than at the beginning. It is believed that intense exercise temporarily increases LDH.
As for the impacts, my experiences conform to the empirical research on men 70 years and older. The effort to benefit curve is described by an inverted-U; get to the right side of the tail and the net benefits drop. This is very different than we see in younger men. Even more depressing is that training doesn’t seem to shorten the recovery interval much. And not just in my case; others my age have reported similar experiences.
Perhaps others in my age group will report other findings and help us all figure this out. I love strenuous lower body exercises, especially hiking steep mountains and would love to be able to do more of it.
Doesn’t that imply that Urolithin is cheaper? I don’t think it is? And it assumes that Urolithin actually works.
I’m going to blame the placement of that text.
By chance, I came across several sources of `Urolithin-A at Amazon which look to be legitimate. Have the patent issues been resolved?
Given the improvements in LLMs, I submitted this question to 4o to obtain a good review.
Urolithin A (UA), a metabolite derived from ellagitannins found in foods such as pomegranates, berries, and nuts, has gained significant attention for its potential impact on human health, wellness, and longevity. The research on UA spans preclinical and clinical studies, with varying degrees of certainty and direct evidence. The following breakdown categorizes the findings based on the strength of evidence:
UA stands as a compelling candidate for promoting healthspan and wellness, particularly through mitochondrial support and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. However, its full potential in longevity and chronic disease prevention awaits more rigorous, long-term human research.
4o
Human clinical trials investigating Urolithin A (UA) have employed various dosing regimens to assess its safety and efficacy:
These studies collectively suggest that daily doses of UA ranging from 250 mg to 1,000 mg are safe and well-tolerated in human populations, with doses of 500 mg and 1,000 mg commonly used to evaluate efficacy in enhancing muscle function and mitochondrial health.
Additional possibly helpful information:
Yes, certain gut bacteria have been identified as key players in the conversion of ellagitannins and ellagic acid into Urolithin A (UA). The microbial conversion process involves specific bacterial species capable of metabolizing these polyphenols. Notably, the presence and activity of these bacteria can vary widely among individuals, which can impact the efficiency of UA production. The main bacterial genera and species associated with this conversion include:
While direct supplementation of specific probiotic strains for UA production is not well-established, fostering a diverse and balanced gut microbiome through broad-spectrum probiotics, prebiotics, and a polyphenol-rich diet could help enhance the chances of efficient UA conversion. Research into targeted probiotics capable of enhancing UA production is still developing, and there is potential for future advances in microbiome-targeted therapies aimed at boosting UA synthesis.
Overall, Gordonibacter species are the most directly linked to UA conversion, but the process involves a complex interplay of gut microbial communities.
4o
And Perplexity did a pretty good job of summarizing the patent situation - unless it made stuff up. It has access to this forum and it quotes us in the “Sources” at the end.
Nestlé’s patent coverage on Urolithin A is complex and has significant implications for other companies looking to sell the compound as a supplement. Here’s an overview of the situation:
Nestlé Health Science, through its partnership with Amazentis, has secured several patents related to Urolithin A:
Composition Patents: These cover specific formulations containing Urolithin A, including combinations with other compounds like nicotinamide riboside[2].
Method Patents: These patents cover various uses of Urolithin A, such as:
Production Methods: Patents have been granted for methods of preparing Urolithin A and its salts, particularly for large-scale production[2].
The patent situation creates challenges for other companies wanting to sell Urolithin A as a supplement:
Limited Freedom to Operate: While Urolithin A itself is a naturally occurring compound, Nestlé’s patents on specific uses and formulations restrict other companies’ ability to market it for certain purposes[3][4].
Legal Challenges: Nestlé has shown willingness to pursue legal action against competitors. For example, DoNotAge.org was forced to stop selling Urolithin A due to legal pressure from Nestlé[3][4].
Narrow Marketing Claims: Companies may be able to sell Urolithin A but might be restricted in making certain health claims, particularly related to muscle function[3].
Research and Development Constraints: The patents may limit other companies’ ability to conduct research or develop new products using Urolithin A without risking infringement[5][6].
Despite these challenges, there may still be opportunities for other companies to sell Urolithin A as a supplement:
Different Formulations: Companies might develop unique formulations or combinations not covered by Nestlé’s patents[2].
Alternative Applications: Exploring uses of Urolithin A not specifically claimed in Nestlé’s patents could provide avenues for product development[5].
Geographic Considerations: Patent coverage may vary by country, potentially allowing sales in regions where certain patents are not in force[7].
Licensing Agreements: Companies might negotiate licensing agreements with Nestlé or Amazentis to use the patented technology[5][7].
Patent Expiration: As patents expire, opportunities for generic versions of Urolithin A products may emerge[6].
In conclusion, while Nestlé’s patents create significant barriers, they do not completely prevent other companies from selling Urolithin A as a supplement. However, such companies would need to carefully navigate the patent landscape and potentially face legal challenges from Nestlé[3][4]. The situation underscores the complex interplay between intellectual property rights and the dietary supplement market.
Sources
[1] Nestlé invests in mitochondrial health ingredient - Food Dive Nestlé invests in mitochondrial health ingredient | Food Dive
[2] Patents Assigned to Amazentis SA Patents Assigned to Amazentis SA - Justia Patents Search
[3] Nestle sues DoNotAge : r/NMN - Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/NMN/comments/13xkgg2/nestle_sues_donotage/
[4] Sad news about Urolithin A, Nestle Blocking Sales by Competitors Sad news about Urolithin A, Nestle Blocking Sales by Competitors
[5] Nestlé Health Science invests in global strategic partnership with … Nestlé Health Science invests in global strategic partnership with Amazentis to develop its new cellular nutrient Urolithin A | Markets Insider
[6] Nestle takes an equity stake in cellular nutrition company | 2019-04-02 Nestle takes an equity stake in cellular nutrition company | 2019-04-02 | Baking Business
[7] Nestlé Health Science Invests Amazentis’ Cellular Nutrient Urolithin A Nestlé Health Science Invests Amazentis' Cellular Nutrient Urolithin A
[8] Nestlé invests in Amazentis to leverage anti-aging technology Nestlé invests in Amazentis to leverage anti-aging technology
[9] Nestle invests in Urolithin A cellular nutrition technology Nestle invests in Urolithin A cellular nutrition technology
[10] One of the most undervalued companies of our generation? (part 2) One of the most undervalued companies of our generation? (part 2)
[11] Nestle enters nutritional-health partnership with local technology … https://www.just-food.com/news/nestle-enters-nutritional-health-partnership-with-local-technology-firm-amazentis/
[12] US10695320B2 - Compositions comprising urolithin compounds US10695320B2 - Compositions comprising urolithin compounds - Google Patents
[13] WO2017036992A1 - Compositions comprising urolithin compounds WO2017036992A1 - Compositions comprising urolithin compounds - Google Patents
[14] Urolithin-A promotes CD8+ T cell-mediated cancer - AACR Journals https://aacrjournals.org/cancerrescommun/article-pdf/doi/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0022/3442736/crc-24-0022.pdf
[15] Everything You Need To Know About Urolithin A - Timeline Longevity Everything You Need To Know About Urolithin A - Timeline Longevity
[16] Does Nestlé Own a Patent on Urolithin A? : r/urolithin_a - Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/urolithin_a/comments/1ese0ul/does_nestlé_own_a_patent_on_urolithin_a/
[17] Sad news about Urolithin A, Nestle Blocking Sales by Competitors Sad news about Urolithin A, Nestle Blocking Sales by Competitors
[18] Introducing Celltrient™ Cellular Nutrition | Nestlé Health Science Introducing Celltrient™ Cellular Nutrition | Nestlé Health Science
[19] “What to do about the leaky gut” - PMC - PubMed Central “What to do about the leaky gut” - PMC
[20] WO2014111580A1 - Urolithin b for muscle growth - Google Patents WO2014111580A1 - Urolithin b for muscle growth - Google Patents
[21] Timeline raises questions about Urolithin A supplements on Amazon Timeline raises questions about Urolithin A supplements on Amazon
[22] Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. - IPqwery Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
[23] US10442784B2 - Compositions comprising an urolithin compound US10442784B2 - Compositions comprising an urolithin compound - Google Patents
[24] EP3278800B1 - Google Patents EP3278800B1 - Compositions and methods for improving mitochondrial function and treating muscle-related pathological conditions - Google Patents
[25] Nestlé Health Science and Amazentis partner on a new class of … Nestlé Health Science and Amazentis partner on a new class of “breakthrough” cellular nutrients
[26] Partnerships and investments | Nestlé Health Science https://www.nestlehealthscience.co.za/partners
[27] Anyone have a read on Urolithin A? : r/PeterAttia - Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterAttia/comments/1do37py/anyone_have_a_read_on_urolithin_a/
[28] [PDF] Meaningful innovation to boost growth - Nestlé https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/2022-11/investor-seminar-2022-innovation.pdf
[29] Nestlé and L’oréal Are Betting on Urolithin a, a Longevity Supplement https://www.businessinsider.com/nestle-and-loreal-are-betting-on-urolithin-a-longevity-supplement-2024-10
I think the real issue with UA is that it is not that effective according to my N=1 experimentation.
Rapamycin, however, hits the spot as do other molecules.
I’ve posted this before, this seems legitimate (iHerb own brand). But isn’t there not that much good evidence for urolithin a?
https://www.iherb.com/pr/super-nutrition-urolithin-a-250-mg-60-liquid-veggie-capsules/142031
Confirmed!
Pretty hard to get any supplements where the base compounds do not come from offshore.
I buy all my base compounds from reputable Chinese manufacturers, just like all the other supplement companies do.
The product is called “Urolithin A,” and the label says it contains 500 mg UA per 2 capsules. However, the analysis doesn’t quantify UA, but urolithins. That could be a mix rich in urolithin-B or -G, which are reported to have pharmacological effects in mice but no the specific mitophagy activation.
What’s a mitophagy activation? I swear supplement sellers create new buzzwords all the time, by making them known and placing weight on them rather than the hard endpoints that matter in the end.
I agree with you that hard endpoints are what matters in the end. If I call a product “Rapamycin” and its CoA measures the amount of macrolide antimicrobials in the product without specifying the amount of rapamycin, someone looking for an mTOR inhibitor will not be swayed by the fact that other macrolide antimicrobials also benefit some hard outcomes.
I already understood your point, I have no disagreement with it. Good find.
I never said any of the other Urolithins were efficacious. Mitophagy activation sounds like marketing to me, that was my point. So you can look for a supplement with Urolithin A CoA, and it might not make a difference either way.