Repurposing Rapamycin: Topical mTOR Inhibition Shows Promise for Skin Senescence and Proliferative Pathologies

Topical application of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor sirolimus (rapamycin) is demonstrating significant clinical utility far beyond its FDA-approved indication for tuberous sclerosis-associated angiofibromas. A comprehensive systematic review of 47 studies reveals that localized mTOR inhibition effectively manages a spectrum of hyperproliferative, inflammatory, and senescence-driven dermatological conditions without triggering systemic immunosuppression.

The fundamental mechanism relies on sirolimus binding to FKBP12, forming a complex that halts the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling cascade, thereby preventing cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase. This targeted suppression of cellular proliferation and angiogenesis translates to measurable clinical improvements in rare genodermatoses, vascular anomalies, and benign skin tumors.

For the longevity and biogerontology sector, the most actionable data emerges from applications in skin aging and senescence. Clinical trials utilizing ultra-low concentration compounded sirolimus (0.001%) demonstrated a reduction in the cellular senescence marker p16INK4A, concurrent with an increase in collagen VII. [Confidence: High]. This resulted in increased dermal volume, reduced fine wrinkles, and decreased skin sagging.

Crucially, the safety profile of topical sirolimus remains highly favorable. Across various formulations—ranging from 0.001% to 8% concentrations—systemic absorption was negligible, with blood levels consistently remaining below the 4 ng/mL immunosuppressive threshold. While local irritation is common, the lack of systemic toxicity positions topical sirolimus as a viable, practical intervention for localized tissue rejuvenation and disease modification.

Source:

  • Open Access Paper: Off-Label Topical Application of Sirolimus (Rapamycin) for Dermatological Conditions
  • Institution: University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Hospital, Canada.
  • Journal: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, July 14, 2025
  • Impact Evaluation: The impact score of this journal is approximately 2.4, evaluated against a typical high-end range of 0–60+ for top general science, therefore this is a Medium impact journal.

Related Reading:

Study Design Specifications

  • Type: Systematic Literature Review.

  • Subjects: Human subjects; the review analyzed 47 human clinical studies, encompassing randomized controlled trials (Level 1 evidence), prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case reports (Level 4 evidence). Preclinical animal models were strictly excluded from the efficacy analysis.

  • Formulations Investigated: Compounded solutions, mouthwashes, creams, and ointments ranging from 0.001% to 8% sirolimus concentration.

Mechanistic Deep Dive

  • mTOR & Cellular Senescence: Sirolimus actively downregulates the expression of the p16INK4A protein in the epidermis, a primary biomarker of cellular senescence, while stimulating the synthesis of collagen VII. [Confidence: High].

  • Keratinocyte Hyperproliferation: By downregulating the expression of nonfunctional keratin genes (such as KRT6 and KRT16), mTOR inhibition reduces mechanical stress-induced injury and keratoderma in genetic disorders like pachyonychia congenita. [Confidence: Medium].

  • Angiogenesis & Endothelial Proliferation: Sirolimus exerts localized antineoplastic and anti-angiogenic effects by inhibiting pathways driving vascular anomalies, significantly improving outcomes in conditions like Kaposi sarcoma and post-laser port-wine stains. [Confidence: High].

Novelty

This paper aggregates highly fragmented off-label clinical data to definitively confirm that localized cutaneous mTOR inhibition delivers therapeutic and senolytic-like benefits without crossing the systemic immunosuppressive threshold (<4 ng/mL). It bridges the gap between theoretical biogerontology (mTOR’s role in aging) and practical, observable human dermatology.

Critical Limitations

  • Extreme Methodological Heterogeneity: There is zero standardization in the compounded formulations utilized across the literature, with concentrations wildly varying by a magnitude of 8,000x (0.001% to 8%). [Confidence: High].
  • Weak Evidence Hierarchy: The bulk of the synthesized data relies on Level 4 evidence (case reports and small case series) lacking placebo-controlled comparator groups.
  • Confounding Interventions: The independent therapeutic effect of topical sirolimus is frequently obscured by concurrent treatments, such as CO2 or pulsed dye laser therapies and intralesional steroids.
  • Missing Data: The literature entirely lacks comparative dose-response trials to establish the optimal topical concentration for balancing efficacy against local site irritation