Rapamycin Lowered my measure of egg reserves - Antimullerian Hormone (AMH)

I’m 33 and I’ve been taking rapamycin for six months. 6mg once weekly.

I started for the same reason as @Forever29 in a thread a year ago that I’m not allowed to link to. I wanted to preserve my ovarian egg reserves.
The thread name in the URL was:
Rapamycin-might-have-not-reversed-aging-in-my-ovaries

The doctor I visited to start on it had me measure my AMH before I started, to get a baseline. In March 2025 it was 4.69 ng/ml, a great number for my age. Much like @Forever29, I was shocked to measure again yesterday and find it’s dropped to 2.91 ng/ml. Unfortunately, the doctor I started with bait and switched me on payment models, and I haven’t found a new one yet to help me determine next steps.

I’m hoping @Forever29 has remeasured AMH since going off, and can answer if her levels rebounded. Towards the end of the thread, it was pointed out that perhaps this drop is just an mTOR suppression of ovulation itself, which could result in the AMH drop as a side effect of preservation / ovulation suppression. I’m hoping for that. If I don’t hear from @Forever29 I may try pausing a remeasuring for myself.

@Forever29 mentioned her cycles were shorter. For the record, I have PMDD - premenstrual dysphoric disorder, a pretty good sign of not great hormonal balance. I haven’t treated it hormonally since my teens. My cycle feels longer but it’s hard to tell for sure. Here are my cycle lengths before and after rapamycin.

Dec - 27
Jan - 27
Feb - 27
Mar - 28
Apr - 30
May - 27
Jun-Jul: Took intermittently but stopped between doctors
Jun - 29
Jul - 30
Aug - 30
September - started rapamycin consistently
Sept - 29
Oct - 27
Nov - 30
Dec - 33
Jan - 30

Oh My God! i am sorry hun, i knew i am not imagining. At 33 years old the drop of AMH suiddenly is definitely not expected. This forum is censored, they edited the title o‚f my thread and the content I wrote. Without my consent. I never wrote ‘it may have not reversed aging’, i wrote it harmed me. But as usual with so niche forums, they don’t want to stay unbiased here and they censored it, making young women like yourself deluded that it cant harm.

I have not remeasured it but of course it hasnt bounced back, it doesnt bounce back in studies either, it is a result of die off of oocytes, I posted some studies about it.

Lets connect i want to contact those rapa researchers for a long time but they ignore me
I want human data, i dont see anything published? My cycle went back to 33 but not always, it keeps getting disturbed bouncing between 29/30 and 33 days, of course the aging is expected but as I wrote in my post this happened a WEEK after rapamycin, that suddenly i got period earlier, so it was suspicious because ‚for 10+ years my period was 32/33 days precisely.

Hi, I’m a guy, and this is not my area of expertise, but there have been probably a dozen mouse studies and a few human studies that are ongoing for rapamycin helping extend fertility in females (mice and now in humans). So, it’s early and everyone is still learning. There are lots of unknowns still.

I would recommend you work with an OBGYN who is knowledgeable about this area because I’m sure that there are going to be fine details like exactly when you measure AMH (in terms of relationship to your timing on the rapamycin dosing, etc.) that you need to factor in when evaluating whether things are working for you. Ideally I’d suggest working with Dr.Aimee Eyvazzadeh (the only OBGYN I know of who works with women using rapamycin professionally) - who is profiled here: Rapamycin for Fertility and Menopause; Clinical Results

I spoke with her by email recently and things seem to be going fine for her and her clients and she’s going to be publishing some case studies on the success her clients are having with rapamycin. Does that mean it works for everyone - of course not.

But before you get too excited and concerned about your results - good or bad - I’d work with an OBGYN who ideally understands and has experience with rapamycin. If Dr. Aimee is not available - perhaps she can suggest others. I know that she talks with a lot of other OGBYNs about her work, and she is also in touch with Columbia University and Yusin Suh who is doing the rapamycin VIBRANT study.

New studies are coming out every month on rapamycin and fertility (it seems) - like this: Short-term rapamycin treatment improves embryo quality, pregnancy, and live births

and this: Short-Term Rapamycin Mitigates the Senescence of Ovaries and Somatic Stem Cells in Multiple Organs in Reproductively Aged Mice

I also would look at other strategies too:

1 Like

@HelloRapa and @Forever29 it seems like the information below likely explains what you are seeing - would you agree? And its nothing to worry about - the lower AMH is expected and shows that the Rapamycin is helping.

Note - I just queried Google Gemini Pro with the following prompt (you can tweak it yourself and run it on other AI systems:

Role: You are a Longevity Research Analyst and OBGYN. Your audience consists of scientifically literate longevity biohackers, clinicians, and professionals.

Task: Identify how rapamycin impacts women’s AMH levels if she was taking rapamycin on a pulsatile basis once every week 6mg?

Gemini Response:

Executive Summary

For a woman taking a pulsatile dose of rapamycin (e.g., 6 mg once weekly), the expected impact on Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels is clinically paradoxical: AMH levels will likely decrease or appear artificially suppressed during active treatment, even though the underlying true ovarian reserve is being preserved. Clinicians and biohackers monitoring ovarian health must understand that during mTOR inhibition, a drop in AMH is a feature of the drug’s mechanism of action, not a symptom of accelerated ovarian aging.

In a clinical setting, a woman taking a 6 mg once-weekly pulsatile dose of rapamycin will likely present with suppressed or artificially decreased serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels during the active treatment phase. For the prescribing OBGYN or longevity clinician, it is critical to understand that this decline is an intended pharmacokinetic feature of systemic mTOR inhibition, rather than an indicator of accelerated ovarian senescence.

Mechanism of Action: The AMH Paradox

To understand why AMH drops while the ovarian reserve is preserved, we must distinguish between the true ovarian reserve and the functional proxy we measure in the blood.

To correctly interpret AMH panels in longevity patients, clinicians must differentiate between the absolute primordial follicle reserve and the actively developing follicle pool.

  1. mTORC1 and Follicle Recruitment: The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) acts as the primary metabolic sensor triggering the activation of dormant, primordial follicles. Hyperactivation of this pathway accelerates the depletion of the ovarian reserve.
  2. Origin of AMH: AMH is exclusively secreted by the granulosa cells of growing preantral and small antral follicles; it is not produced by dormant primordial follicles.
  3. The Pharmacological Brake: A 6 mg weekly dose of rapamycin provides robust, systemic mTORC1 inhibition. This intervention forces the primordial follicle pool to remain in a state of quiescence, significantly slowing their transition into the growing phase.
  4. The Biomarker Result: Because the recruitment of new follicles is suspended, the total volume of active, AMH-secreting granulosa cells diminishes as older follicles naturally mature or undergo atresia. Consequently, peripheral blood draws will show a marked decline in AMH.

6 mg Pharmacodynamics vs. Current Clinical Trials

While 6 mg weekly is a standard protocol within the longevity biohacking community, clinical baselines for ovarian aging are currently anchored at a slightly lower dose.

  • The VIBRANT Trial: The foremost human trial in this space, the Validating Benefits of Rapamycin for Reproductive Aging Treatment (VIBRANT) study at Columbia University, utilizes a 5 mg/week pulsatile dose for 12 weeks in perimenopausal women (aged 35–45).
  • Dose-Dependent Effects: Early institutional reports from Columbia Fertility indicate that mTOR inhibition can slow the rate of follicular loss by approximately 20% (reducing the loss from roughly 50 eggs/month to 15 eggs/month). A 6 mg weekly dose will likely achieve equivalent or slightly stronger suppression of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. However, as the dose increases, the probability of complete anovulation, menstrual irregularity, and temporary infertility during the treatment window also rises.

Clinical Management and Actionable Insights

For OBGYNs managing patients utilizing off-label rapamycin for longevity or fertility preservation:

  • Pre-Treatment Baselining: It is mandatory to establish true baseline AMH and Antral Follicle Count (AFC) via transvaginal ultrasound prior to initiating rapamycin therapy.
  • Intra-Treatment Monitoring: AMH draws conducted while the patient is actively taking 6 mg/week are clinically useless for assessing absolute ovarian reserve. They only serve as a proxy to confirm that the drug is successfully inhibiting mTOR and suppressing follicle recruitment.
  • Washout Protocols: If the patient intends to undergo ovarian stimulation for IVF, oocyte cryopreservation, or natural conception, rapamycin must be discontinued. Continuing rapamycin during pregnancy is strictly contraindicated due to its mechanism as an immunosuppressant and cellular growth inhibitor.

Knowledge Gaps and Required Data

  • Rebound Kinetics: We lack robust longitudinal data to map the exact trajectory and timeframe of AMH recovery following the cessation of a 6 mg/week protocol. The required washout period to allow mTOR reactivation, follicle recruitment, and AMH normalization before administering exogenous gonadotropins is a current clinical unknown, though 1 to 3 months is a pragmatic estimate based on the drug’s roughly 60-hour half-life and the timeline of folliculogenesis.
  • Therapeutic Thresholds: It remains unverified if a 6 mg dose provides superior preservation of the ovarian reserve compared to the 5 mg dose used in VIBRANT, or if the 20% higher dose simply increases off-target metabolic side effects (e.g., hyperlipidemia, transient insulin resistance, or oral ulcers) without conferring additional gonadal benefit.

Would you like an analysis of the proposed washout protocols and the theoretical optimal timing for resuming standard IVF stimulation tracking after a patient ceases a 6 mg weekly rapamycin regimen?