https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06204-3
It seems that “younger” people don’t need psychedelics (they already have enough risks), though I know some who tried them as teens and it permanently changed them (Grimes is on record for trying LSD at 13, and it seems to have been good for her). [I know two others who tried it at 12-14 for who it has been good for too, though **set and setting** applies 5 times over for those who are underage]
But for older people, they can make all the difference… [like weed, which is NOT good for younger people, but beneficial in older people]
Francis Crick was uniquely creative (by the standards of older scientists) later in life [creating TWO entirely new scientific fields at ages at ages when every other scientist would be declining - while his last major breakthroughs in molecular biology were before 1967 - he was still VERY ahead of his time when he studied consciousness] AND the canonical late bloomer, I wonder if his psychedelic use explained it…