“I often use BPC-157 500 mcg/day subcutaneously for individuals post operatively as you only get one chance to heal, or for chronic non-healing wounds or acute injuries, or older injuries that aren’t healing”
May I ask - are the injections as close to the injury site as possible? Intramuscular rather than subcutaneous injection when injury is in a muscle?
It might be better to get it closer to the site. We have times with knee surgery where we’ll get the orthopedist to inject BPC into the joint (or I can do it post procedure). I don’t think we have evidence this is a superior approach to simple SC.
Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research are wanting to develop a drug based on it. But they’re not ready for trials yet (& will initially only treat patients with peripheral artery disease).
Logically I think you’re correct.
I have had autologous plasma injections several times and, although there may be some slight systemic “spillover” effect the idea is to get it as close to where it’s needed as possible.
BTW, if you want a new definition of excruciating pain; try plasma injections in the sole of your foot for plantar fasciitis! Even with anaesthetic I taught medical staff a few new words!
Just got a boat load of peptides this afternoon and couldn’t wait to try them all. Holly and Molly. Never I have experienced such amazing feeling. My body is buzzing with pleasure and all my muscle and joint pressure point gone. Holly macaroni have we ever been barking the effing wrong tree for so long with these useless supplements. Even my tinnitus decreased like 80%, i literally have to stop and listen to know that i even have tinnitus any longer. Can we please award 1 million noble prices to the person that invented these absolutely amazing substances. Having said that in case I won’t be writing on these boards in next couple days, most likely I didn’t wake up from my sleep tomorrow morning at all LOL. Actually, I’m looking forward to tomorrow morning because for me the easiest to tell if some supplement/substance is having a good/bad effect is to listen to your body and how you feel the following day when you wake up.
First thing, there is training involved, and need to serious sterility including what is being injected and sterilizing the skin. I prefer 2% chlorhexidine at a minimum.
Now in regard to not being able to do it … EMLA is over the counter. You can get this, and under occlusion for 45 minutes (can use glad wrap) will get some reasonable anesthesia. Many of my patients use this for blood draws, but it works for lot of other things too.
OK, so its morning and everything back to normal. Feel relatively good, or tad better than usual. Tinnitus returned unfortunately. Less stiff than other mornings generally speaking, not much else in terms of positives that I can report. So much for peptide euphoria from my original posting.
I think that one may still a ways off from understanding how to use it for that purpose. Here is an article from 2011 that shows promise and research has continued but why is it not yet on the market? after 13 years?
Specific penetration and accumulation of a homing peptide within atherosclerotic plaques of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice
“Since we’re all in the experimental phase, I think that I’ll try IM for the SS-31. The dose is said to be as effective at 4 mg as at 40, b.i.d or EOD”.
Withe the price of SS-31, there is sure a need for higher effectiveness! Do you have a source for that 10-fold increase for IM?
The two clinical trials I could find on SS-31 used 24 respectively 36 weeks of 40 mg/6d… I assume you are not aiming for that length of time…
I use everychem. It’s owned by the fellow being interviewed here. He’s serious about quality and regularly reduces prices as he brings costs down. He’s behind r/NooTopics on reddit.
Has anybody experienced anything positive in a sustained way from SS-31/elamipretide? I hope so and that I can be proved wrong in my rather bleak view of this peptide.
Sadly, all the excitement and wealth of promising preclinical data for SS-31 does not seem to readily translate to humans in the few clinical trials done, on patients with mitochondrial disease.
It seems that a large dose of SS-31 is needed for a very long time to possibly have an effect in persons with mitochondrial disease, with effects from shorter dosing being transient.
Could “normal” mitochondrial defects from aging in healthy people (with no fatigue) be more amenable to SS-31? FWIW, there are many anecdotal reports from peptide forums of persons without mitochondrial disease “feeling great” on SS-31, down to doses as low as 4 mg SubQ, with no hard data. Often it is people with fatigue saying they are better.