Thank you, @Walter_Brown: great news. It seems like an interesting (and relatively cheap) addition to hair and skin concoctions.
Yesterday I noticed that my lips were becoming fuller. I’ve also started Oxytocin SubQ. I’m also taking Epithalon (5mg per day for two weeks and intend to repeat twice a year).
I just order GSK-Cu for a skin concoction which I am planning.
Old thread but what’s your update on GSK-Cu a year later?
So much has happened to my longevity stack, but I still take the GHK-Cu. In fact I have made it a core part of my routine as it definitely rejuvenates me. I now take it intranasally with oxytocin (own mix) to get the brain benefits:
Can you tell us more about what you do, how you do it, and what you get out of it — if you have any test results changing also?
Sure.
- I buy lyophilized GHK-CU (25mg) and Oxytocin (2mg)
- With that order I buy sufficient bacteriostatic water to reconstitute the peptides.
- I reconstitute by adding the bacteriostatic water to the peptides.
- I then create two nasal spray bottles of peptide and bacteriostatic water solutions. I do this by equally splitting the solutions of GHK-CU and Oxytocin between the two nasal sprayers.
- I then fill the remainder of the 10ml nasal sprayer with additional bacteriostatic water.
- So in summary each nasal sprayer contains 12.5mg GHK-Cu and 1mg Oxytocin mixed in 10ml of bacteriostatic water.
- I then spray intranasally and inhale through my nose at the same time.
I haven’t had test results - but anecdotally both my physiotherapist and personal trainer independently noted improvements in my body control (recovering from MS relapse).
Given the nature of my neurological issues a more detailed and costly tracking of regular MRI scans in a controlled scientific study would be able to show objective changes.
Subjectively feel amazing.
Cool! Where do you source it? I’d imagine you have to be very careful with the purity of anything delivered to the brain.
I am very careful, but I wouldn’t recommend doing any of this stuff (NOT MEDICAL ADVICE). But, seeing as you ask, I personally - and they say it is only for research purposes, so they too are covered - use biotechpeptides (USA) or UK-Peptides. Both have 3rd party testing.
How is it going? Stil doing the GHK-Cu intranasal?
I am planning to start the Ghk-cu subcutaneous again as part of an OSK mimic protocol. Here is what I designed via ChatGPT. Standard health warning: I am not a doctor, this is not medical advice and LLM / AI can be wrong;
Goals
• Improve epigenetic fidelity
• Reduce age-related transcriptional noise
• Support chromatin maintenance and repair
• Enhance NAD⁺/sirtuin signalling
• Bias gene expression toward youthful patterns while preserving cell identity
⸻
Core Stack (4 Pillars)
- Epigenetic Substrate Support
Supports DNA & histone methylation accuracy.
• Trimethylglycine (TMG): 1–2 g/day
• 5-MTHF: 400–800 mcg/day
• Methylcobalamin (B12): 500–1000 mcg/day
⸻
- NAD⁺ / Sirtuin Axis
Supports chromatin regulation and DNA repair.
• NMN 500–1000 mg/day or NR 300–600 mg/day
• Apigenin 25–50 mg/day (CD38 inhibition)
• Magnesium (malate or threonate): 200–400 mg elemental/day
⸻
- GHK-Cu (Repair & Gene Expression Normalisation)
Supports regenerative transcriptional programs (not epigenetic clock reset).
• GHK-Cu (conceptual systemic range): ~1–2 mg/day SC, cycled
• Typical cycle: 4–8 weeks ON → 4 weeks OFF
Mechanistic role:
↓ inflammatory & fibrotic genes
↑ repair, ECM, angiogenesis signalling
⸻
- Chromatin & Inflammation Control
Reduces epigenetic “noise”.
• Sulforaphane: 20–40 mg/day
• Omega-3 (EPA+DHA): 2–3 g/day
• Low-dose lithium (orotate/aspartate): ~1 mg elemental/day
⸻
Cycling Strategy (Example: 12 Weeks)
Weeks 1–4 – Reset Support
All pillars active; emphasis on NAD⁺ + methylation.
Weeks 5–8 – Repair & Consolidation
GHK-Cu ON; continue NAD⁺, methylation, anti-inflammatory support.
Weeks 9–12 – Stabilisation
GHK-Cu OFF; maintain NAD⁺, methylation, omega-3, sulforaphane.
This mirrors OSK’s intermittent expression logic to avoid loss of cell identity.
⸻
Expected Outcomes
• Improved epigenetic stability
• Slower epigenetic aging trajectory
• More youthful transcriptional patterns
• Better tissue repair signalling
Limitations
• Does not replicate OSK-level epigenetic clock reversal
• No cell-identity reset
• Effects are gradual and cumulative
⸻
Bottom line:
This represents a maximum-safe, non-genetic approximation of OSK-adjacent biology, focused on epigenome maintenance rather than reprogramming.