When they replaced BPA, some manufacturers turned to more problematic chemicals, like PVC-based linings.
365 and dole foods asparagus may have BPA-free linings, but their linings seem very… plasticy and sketch just from inspection…
But Amy’s cans and Westbrae lentil cans don’t seem as “problematic/sketch” just on inspection (same with Eden Foods, which took a noticeably longer-than-usual amount of time to replace its BPA)
Stronger linings often have to be made for highly acidic foods like tomatoes… (this was why it was so hard to replace the BPA in Muir Glen tomatoes!)
The “can linings” seem to be composed of resins, which have noticeably different chemical compositions than LDPE/HDPE/PETE. This may be better or it may be worse, I don’t know.
I know plasticlist tested canned foods from many decades ago (canned foods were developed and mass-produced well before plastics became super-prevalent), so this should be very fixable [and my knowing this also makes me inclined to choose canned foods over plastic, even though some plastics scientists are on record for saying they now avoid canned foods]
Some companies may be better inclined towards transparency if you contact them - anything that seems more eco-conscious is probably more trustworthy, but few seem inclined to reveal their actual ingredients b/c “trade secrets” or w/e
EDEN FOODS is best
After two years of persistent work with can manufacturers we acquired a BPA free can. From April of 1999 up until late 2016, EDEN Beans featured a custom-made can lined with a 1960’s vintage oleoresin c-enamel that did not contain the toxin BPA. Oleoresin is a mixture of oil and plant resin extracted from pine or balsam fir trees. In 2017, Eden Foods transitioned to an improved, non-toxic, can lining that works for both low (beans) and high acid (tomato) food items.