I didn’t change the point, I clarified the wording. The issue is still the same.
This is not about insulting you. I’m pointing to a standard of reasoning.
In this case, you presented a mechanism as an explanation without establishing that it is actually a meaningful driver of the outcome.
If you don’t want to engage on that, that’s fine. I’ll leave it there.
You changed the wording. That changed the meaning of the phrase. I had proven your original meaning false. I can prove your changed meaning false. However, I am not going to waste my time. My view is that you disagree with me.
You tend to wish to play the man rather than play the ball. I prefer to stick to rational evidence based arguments about the science.
You obviously don’t recognise that you are insulting me. That may be a subtle point relating to my native language.
After this response I will not waste anyone elses time by engaging with you.