Iron: an underrated factor in aging

This has been an interesting topic because of looking at various people’s different circumstances and in particular the way that TRT skews iron metabolism.

I may be unique in doing weekly full panel blood tests (ie the discount full panel that any lab operates, which does not always include ferritin, but mainly does). Hence I have my ferritin figures since 2022. And here they are:

420 337 358 329 332 404 371 412 325 204.6 364 202 337 176.2 176.2 319 172.9 205 253 205 145 175 157.9 165.7 171.4 190.9 180.4 173.4 222 176.7 ng/ml 298 291 mgc/L 202.5 187.8 174.9 140.4 155.4 170.5 123.2 150 152.6 147.6 168.7 177 201 165 203 168 165 164 154 142 ng/ml 164.16 129 126 134.42 118 116.07 115 120.45 96 going down? 102.5 93 79.02 95 122.54 166 109 95 115.63 161 112 105 97 110 96 99 112 92 68.3 99.5 103.21 96 101.3 108 93 101 56 52.3 56.1 71.3 45.38 83.3 58.06 78.7 76.82 77.4 57.91 71.7 47.66 24.4 60.19 51.9 63.7 56.42 69.8 35.96 67.7 74.41 73.8 72.33 75.9 56.04 63 65.76 55 61 50.79 67.2 63.64 48.6 40.8 24.22 52.63 39.92 38.59 36.08 35.83 33.15 28.84 34.3 20.2 37.40 44.3 30.1 36.2 28.08 19.07 22.25 34.25 89 50.74 34.89 32.01 32.52 25.96 12.43 47 30.71 47.65 47.85 39.01 30.71 33.86 39.53 53 48 39.31 67 44.92 41.91 61 46.96 43.87 58.89 76 60.23 48.7 49.65 50.6 55.1 62 70 72 59.75 37.8 56.23 44.94 35.76 22.75 low iron 37.72 37.14 48 40.31 48.85 41.76 40.66 48.44 45.79 36.34 71 62 67.78 57.72 39.36 30.35 59.77 60.27 76 58.63 70.55 55 46 54.3

The first thing you can say from those is that ferritin is quite variable week to week. It think it probably moves in a sort of range of 15 (the units are the same number in US and Europe even if the units vary because the numerator and denominator vary by the same number).

It would need a bit more work on looking at the variability between ferritin tests to see how variable it is on a day or between days, but clearly you cannot take it as a biomarker like height.

I cannot find who gave the link to this website for some reason: Iron Status Interpreter

Edit 31/3 - it was @Kebossit on a renal thread who I thank.

However, that is a useful start on looking at iron status. I have not tried to work out how reliable it is.

It has changed since I last looked at it as it used to refer to Peter Attia saying ferritin should be in a range of something like 30-400.

Clearly there is a minimum iron level below which people have symptoms like hair loss, but obviously if there is enough iron in haemoglobin then the symptoms which result from a shortage of oxygen do not appear. Hence you cannot just rely on ferritin to judge this.

We know that GPs go for 30 and neurologists go for 70 (because of the dopamine pathway in the brain) - which is why RLS is a potential symptom of iron deficiency.

A few weeks ago I did a chatGPT review of iron and mitophagy. It is a bit long and the conclusion is simply that less iron is better for mitophagy. It has a lot of links to original papers. I have created a share which is:

There is some work in human cells and biopsies from humans

There are, however, as far as I can tell no actual trials into seeing the effects of keeping iron bouncing along the bottom.

Obviously I am doing that myself in a biohacking manner. I have a hypothesis that a highly variable heart rate whilst sleeping is symptomatic of increased autophagy. The only evidence for this, however, is from my own experimentation.

I do think, however, the evidence is that for mitophagy lower ferritin is better, but realistically there are problems from low iron. I am not persuaded that the GP threshold of 30 is right and clearly if there is a nephrologist threshold of 10 then that is wrong. I do think it is important to maintain enough iron for dopamine metabolism, but that gives really an upper limit of 70 and one need to consider symptoms.

This was last night’s sleep tracker. I fasted yesterday and my Monday iron figures were:
Hb 145 g/l Ferritin 54.3 mcg/l CRP 0.4 mg/l Albumin 41.7 g/l MCV 92.5 fl Iron 7.1 mcmol/l TSat 13.1% TIBC 54.3 mcmol/l
TSat is low which is a sign of low iron. These things move quite rapidly, however.

1 Like

I thought it would be worth getting a chatGPT analysis of ferritin and hair.

Conclusion:

So the fairest summary is: under 15 ng/mL = clearly deficient; under 30–40 ng/mL = the range most often associated with hair shedding in the literature; around 40–60 ng/mL = commonly proposed as more supportive for hair growth; 50 ng/mL and above may be associated with better treatment response in some TE data, but this is not yet a universal proven threshold.

2 Likes

Yes, this is true. And you can use a much smaller needle than 25g. I use a 29 gauge for my subq injections and it works just fine, especially since my T is in a base of MCT oil, which is thinner than other oils commonly used as bases for testosterone.

2 Likes

I cannot WAIT for this peptide to be available in one way or another. It is the answer to our prayers for those of us who have to deal with elevated hematocrit and low ferritin issues from TRT. We can control lipids, blood pressure and even mitigate or prevent cardiac hypertrophy from androgens (telmisartan, nebivolol, cilnidipine, etc) but the Hct/ferritin conundrum is still a big thorn in our sides.

1 Like

I’m glad you appreciate it and I agree that people should be careful.

2 Likes

Your values fluctuate surprisingly much. I don’t have data on what typical fluctuations are but mine appear to fluctuate far less and normally they shouldn’t move fast unless you just had an episode of something that caused acute inflammation. It can jump pretty fast when sick becaue it’s an acute phase reactant.

Mine are also all over the place, between 25 and 100.

I should I should put in this topic the fact that rapamycin is known to reduce both WBC and RBC. WBC tends to be more immediately affected because the half life of Neutrophils is quite short. This may not be obvious for people who don’t do frequent blood tests and take rapamycin frequently, but I can see the effects in my RBC because I do weekly tests and don’t take rapamycin more frequently than every 6 weeks.

Hence although it may not be obvious there will be a small amount of anaemia from weekly rapamycin (or fortnightly

1 Like

I came across this the other day… I don’t think its been posted,

A historical cohort study of the effect of lowering body iron through blood donation on incident cardiac events

A historical cohort study published in the journal TRANSFUSION by researchers from the University of Kansas School of Medicine and the Community Blood Center of Greater Kansas City investigates the “iron hypothesis”. This framework suggests that lowering body iron through blood donation may protect against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease by limiting the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

The researchers designed a retrospective analysis tracking 1,508 frequent blood donors (individuals who donated more than one unit of whole blood annually from 1988 to 1990) and compared them against a control group of 1,508 casual donors (individuals who donated only a single unit during that same three-year period). By surveying the participants a median of 10 years later, the researchers evaluated the incidence of acute myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery, and death.

The data indicate that frequent whole blood donation is robustly associated with cardiovascular protection. Cardiac events occurred in 6.3 percent of the frequent donors compared to 10.5 percent of the casual donors. After adjusting for demographic and lifestyle differences, frequent blood donation yielded a 40 percent reduction in cardiovascular event risk (Odds Ratio 0.60). Notably, the protective effects were more pronounced in post-menopausal women than in men, providing compelling circumstantial evidence that offsetting the cessation of menstruation-induced iron loss is highly cardioprotective.

The impact score of this journal is 3.3, evaluated against a typical high-end range of 0–60+ for top general science, therefore this is a Medium impact journal.

Paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00186.x

It always worries me as to how much " After adjusting for demographic and lifestyle differences," has an effect on the figures.

I would be interested in such a study which looks at the iron load directly. It is like vitamin D studies that don’t report 25OHD levels.

What argument would that be?

We need to be told what the adjustment was, how it was calculated and what the results would have been had the adjustment not been made. Also the basis of the assumptions in the adjustment and a sensitivity analysis.

The process of adjusting for confounders is a matter of judgment and to have a purely objective approach is hard. Hence in understanding the reliability of the conclusions we need to understand how the statistics were changed.

1 Like

Just published: Anemia and Blood Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease in Dementia Development 2026

JAMA Netw Open, Karolinska + Sapienza + KTH

They found that anemia was associated with:

  • Higher levels of AD-related blood biomarkers (p-tau217, NfL, GFAP)
  • A higher risk of developing dementia

They conclude:

These findings suggest that anemia may interact with neuropathologic processes, potentially accelerating dementia development.

@John_Hemming @DrFraser @CronosTempi

2 Likes

Recent lab results

Ferritin: 40
Iron: 77 (38-169)
TIBC: 412 (250-450)
UIBC: 335 (111-345)
Sat %: 19 (15-55)

For whatever reason, my body seems to be depleting iron slowly. I began a course of 100mg iron bisglycinate daily to improve my iron stores just a smidge to optimize them.

I absolutely do not believe in having an iron deficiency being a good thing like some people have suggested in here. I am not exactly iron deficient, but I am close. Improving the numbers slightly is in my best interest.

3 Likes

OK. But I’m having a slightly anemic reaction to this study (ahem! apologies, couldn’t resist). To me the most relevant quote from the study was this:

“Anemia was defined according to World Health Organization criteria.”

And what is that? It’s hemoglobin below 12.0 g/dL for women and 13.0 for men.

If someone has such numbers, this is notable. Hardly anyone does (on this list).

Meanwhile, the relationship between iron status and anemia is a huuuuuge can of worms, as seen in this thread. Many of us have what might be seen as below range iron levels, but absolutely don’t have anemia according to WHO criteria.

As an example my numbers from my most recent LabCorp test:

TIBC - 405 ug/dL (ref. 250-450)

UIBC - 330 ug/dL (ref. 111-343)

Iron - 75 ug/dL (ref. 38-169)

Iron Saturation - 19% (ref. 15-55)

Ferritin - 20 ng/mL (ref. 30-400) flagged as Low by LabCorp.

And in the same test, my hemoglobin was 15.4 g/dL (ref. 13.0-17.7).

So, I certainly seem to be on the low side of iron status, but pretty robust hemoglobin number far from WHO anemia. As I’ve reported I don’t experience any of the typical anemia symptoms and my energy levels are fine.

How useful is this connection (anemia/AD) to most of those of us on this list who struggle with their iron status? I don’t know.

Also, if you dig into this study, it becomes ever more equivocal, with a variety of factors (BMI included, nutrition status etc.) and after adjustments barely on the border of significance. Like I said: anemic.

The signal may be there, but we need much stronger results, especially those which might allow us to define optimal iron biomarkers (which was not even the focus of this study).

1 Like

Even though they used a low cut off to define anemia, higher hemoglobin might still be better for those AD biomarkers. It’s a pity they didn’t report ferritin and other iron biomarkers.

As you said, it’s a big can of worms…

2 Likes

There is an interesting question as to how the body prioritises Iron usage when iron stores are low. We have identified two key requirements - Haemoglobin and Dopamine although Iron is needed for other reasons. Hb is easy to measure. Neurologists say ferritin should be 70 for Dopamine adequacy. I don’t know what the studies are on this.

There are many other uses for Iron, but we also know higher iron levels (possibly over ferritin 100 without inflammation) are detrimental.

Very similar to my latest numbers. Your ferritin is slightly lower though.

“A study in Sweden found that older people with anemia (i.e., hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL in women and 13 g/dL in men) were 66% more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease and have higher levels of biomarkers for Alzheimer’s than those who were not anemic (Valletta, JAMA 2026). However, this association does not prove cause-and-effect and there appeared to be little or no additional benefit to having much higher than adequate hemoglobin levels.”

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2847873

Iron deficiency and dementia risk: evidence from the Swedish population-based cohort study AMORIS