How To Boost NAD Levels To Fight Inflammation, Improve Recovery, and Slow Aging (Patrick/ Brenner)

I. Executive Summary

Dr. Charles Brenner, the discoverer of the Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) eukaryotic pathway, dismantles much of the prevailing “biohacker” dogma regarding NAD+ supplementation. His core thesis challenges the popular notion that systemic NAD+ decline is a universal feature of aging observable in blood; rather, he argues that NAD+ dysregulation is tissue-specific, driven by metabolic stress (obesity, alcohol, infection) and DNA damage (PARP activation).

The interview centers on the biochemical superiority of Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) over Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) and IV NAD+. Brenner provides a mechanistic critique of NMN, asserting that its phosphate group prevents cellular entry, forcing it to degrade into NR extracellularly before uptake—rendering the “one step closer” marketing claim scientifically invalid. Furthermore, he highlights significant quality control issues in the NMN supply chain.

Critically, Brenner presents clinical data suggesting that Resveratrol—often stacked with NAD+ boosters—is not only ineffective but actively antagonistic, blunting the benefits of NR in peripheral artery disease (PAD) trials. The actionable signal here is a pivot away from “lifespan extension” hype toward specific use cases: mitigating inflammatory “storms” (COVID, autoimmune), accelerating athletic recovery, and supporting metabolic function in fatty liver disease. The consensus dose for clinical efficacy sits at 1,000mg/day, significantly higher than standard retail recommendations.


II. Insight Bullets

  • The Phosphate Barrier: NMN cannot enter cells intact. It must be dephosphorylated into NR extracellularly to cross the membrane, making the claim that NMN is “more direct” biochemically false.
  • Resveratrol Antagonism: In a randomized clinical trial (RCT) for Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), stacking Resveratrol with NR negated the functional benefits (walking distance) seen with NR monotherapy.
  • Tissue vs. Blood NAD+: Measuring blood NAD+ is largely a vanity metric for healthy people. True deficits occur in metabolically stressed tissues (heart, liver, brain) which are not reflected in standard blood panels.
  • The “Dark Matter” of Pharmacology: NR turnover is so rapid in blood that it is difficult to detect directly; efficacy must be measured by tissue metabolites and functional outcomes (e.g., cytokine reduction), not just serum levels.
  • Infection as an NAD+ Sink: Viral infections (like COVID-19) trigger massive PARP superfamily activation to attack double-stranded RNA, depleting cellular NAD+ reserves and necessitating replenishment.
  • Lactation Demand: Pregnancy and lactation place extreme stress on maternal NAD+ stores; animal models show NR supplementation significantly improves lactation volume and offspring neurodevelopment.
  • Sirtuins Demoted: Brenner challenges the “longevity gene” status of Sirtuins (SIRT1), suggesting their activation via compounds like Resveratrol is “science fiction” and lacking robust human data.
  • IV NAD+ Skepticism: Intravenous NAD+ causes a strong innate immune response and must break down into precursors (NR/Nicotinamide) to be utilized, making it a painful, expensive, and inefficient delivery method compared to oral NR.
  • Clinical Dosage Threshold: While consumer doses are often low (300mg), clinical efficacy for anti-inflammatory and metabolic outcomes is consistently seen at 1,000mg (1g) per day.
  • Liver Fat Reduction: Post-hoc analysis of RCTs suggests NR may reduce hepatic fat, but trials must be specifically powered/randomized for fatty liver to confirm this (Level B/C).
  • Circadian Alignment: NAD+ synthesis and consumption are circadian-regulated. Shift work and jet lag disrupt this cycle, creating a specific use case for morning supplementation to re-anchor metabolic rhythm.
  • Cancer Safety: Unlike folate, which can fuel established tumors, long-term Nicotinamide data (ONTRAC trial) suggests NAD+ precursors are preventative for skin cancers and do not fuel tumor growth in human populations.
  • Exercise Synergy: NR is not a replacement for exercise. The highest efficacy is observed when NR supports the recovery phase of resistance or endurance training (Mitochondrial Biogenesis).

III. Adversarial Claims & Evidence Table

Claim from Video Speaker’s Evidence Scientific Reality (Current Data 2022-2026) Grade Verdict
NMN is superior because it is “one step closer” to NAD+. Biochemical constraint: Phosphate group blocks cell entry. NMN must be converted to NR by CD73 to enter cells (Brenner et al., 2024). No SLC12A8 transporter confirmed in humans. D Unsupported (Bioavailability)
Resveratrol is a key longevity compound. Cited PAD study failure (McDermott et al.). Resveratrol blunts exercise adaptations and fails to improve metabolic markers in healthy humans (Copenhagen Study, 2023). A Debunked / Red Flag
NR reduces systemic inflammation. 8 RCTs (inc. COPD, PAD) showing lowered IL-6/IL-10. Consistent reduction in inflammatory markers in metabolically stressed populations; less effect in healthy young adults (Nature Aging, 2025). B Strong Support (Pathological Context)
IV NAD+ is the “Gold Standard” delivery. Mechanistic rebuttal: breaks down to precursors; causes immune stress. No RCTs supporting IV superiority over oral precursors. Safety profile is worse due to infusion reactions. E Speculative / Safety Warning
NR aids in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). McDermott RCT: Improved 6-min walk test (Monotherapy). Confirmed functional improvement in PAD; contradictory results when combined with antioxidants. B Plausible
NMN supplements on the market are pure. Cited testing: 17/20 products failed label claims. FDA NMN ban (2022/2023) drove market to gray zone; purity varies wildly. C Safety Warning

IV. Actionable Protocol (Prioritized)

High Confidence Tier (A/B Evidence)

  • Discontinue Resveratrol: Immediately cease stacking Resveratrol with NAD+ boosters. It provides no benefit and likely inhibits mitochondrial adaptation and vascular function.
  • Standard of Care +: Prioritize Resistance Training and Zone 2 cardio. NAD+ precursors are only validated as support for recovery and mitochondrial biogenesis induced by physical stress, not as a replacement.
  • Metabolic Management: For individuals with obesity or insulin resistance, GLP-1 agonists (under medical supervision) combined with exercise remain the primary intervention; NAD+ is a tertiary support for liver health.

Experimental Tier (C/D Evidence - High Safety)

  • NR Protocol:

  • Dose: 1,000mg (1g) daily. (Note: Most commercial capsules are 300mg; clinical efficacy requires higher dosing).

  • Timing: Morning administration to align with circadian enzyme transcription.

  • Indication: High-load athletic recovery, post-viral fatigue, shift work/jet lag, or older adults (>50) with inflammatory biomarkers (hsCRP, IL-6).

  • Lactation Support: 500mg-1g NR daily for nursing mothers to support milk production and offspring development (discuss with OB/GYN, based on strong mammalian data).

Red Flag Zone (Safety Data Absent)

  • IV NAD+ Clinics: Avoid. High cost ($500+), potential for phlebitis/hypersensitivity, and mechanistically inferior to oral precursors due to extracellular breakdown.
  • “Discount” NMN: Avoid NMN powders lacking third-party NSF/USP certification due to high prevalence of impurities and the regulatory “gray market” status.

V. Technical Mechanism Breakdown

The interview focuses heavily on the NAD+ Salvage Pathway, specifically the bottleneck of cellular entry.

  1. Extracellular Hydrolysis (The NMN Problem):
  • NMN is a nucleotide (base + sugar + phosphate).
  • The cell membrane is impermeable to charged phosphates.
  • For NMN to be utilized, it must be dephosphorylated by the ecto-enzyme CD73 (ecto-5’-nucleotidase) into Nicotinamide Riboside (NR).
  1. Intracellular Transport & Synthesis (The NR Solution):
  • NR enters the cell via ENTs (Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters).
  • Once inside, NRK 1/2 (Nicotinamide Riboside Kinase) re-phosphorylates NR back into NMN.
  • NMN is then rapidly converted to NAD+ by NMNAT (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Adenylyltransferase).
  • Takeaway: Supplementing NMN forces the body to break it down to NR outside the cell, then rebuild it inside. NR supplementation skips the extracellular breakdown step.
  1. PARP-Driven Depletion:
  • PARP1 (Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) detects DNA Strand Breaks or Viral RNA.
  • It cleaves NAD+ to attach ADP-ribose chains to repair proteins (Signaling).
  • Over-activation (chronic inflammation, COVID-19, sun damage) drains the NAD+ pool, leading to metabolic crisis (low ATP) and cell death (Apoptosis).
  • Biohacker Context: The goal of supplementation is to refill the pool that PARP enzymes are draining during stress.
1 Like