Hot water immersion leads to the greatest thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses compared with both traditional and far infrared saunas

How they did it:

During hot water immersion, participants were immersed to the level of the sternum in ∼40.5°C water for 45 min. Participants’ left arm was supported above the water for blood pressure measurements.

Paper: Comparison of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to different passive heat therapy modalities


Figure 3. Total sweat loss in hot water immersion (HWI), traditional sauna (TRAD), and far infrared sauna (FIR). **P < 0.01 HWI vs. FIR and TRAD.


Figure 4. Heart rate (A ) and mean arterial pressure (B ) at baseline and throughout heating in hot water immersion (HWI), traditional sauna (TRAD), and far infrared sauna (FIR). *P < 0.05 HWI vs. FIR, †P < 0.05 HWI vs. TRAD, ‡P < 0.05 TRAD vs. FIR.


Figure 6. Cardiac output (A ), systemic vascular resistance (B ), and stroke volume (C ) at baseline (BL), halfway through heating (MID), and at the end of hearting (END) in hot water immersion (HWI), traditional sauna (TRAD), and far infrared sauna (FIR). *P < 0.05 HWI vs. FIR, †P < 0.05 HWI vs. TRAD, ‡P < 0.05 TRAD vs. FIR.

10 Likes

As Bryan Johnson said in his videos, too much temperature in your testies is horrible for their health. How would we protect then if we immerse ourselves in water?

1 Like

That’s a valid concern. As I had not looked at that before, I just asked Chat (GPT 5.1 thinking mode).
Here is the final summary which I find informative, for me at least.

1 Like

I intermittantly do home hot baths. I dial it up by heating a big pot of water on the stove. I’ve started using an ice pack for “the boys”, simple frozen plastic bags. I go through several for 20-30 minutes. Not perfect, but noticably cooler, cheap and good enough.

1 Like

My first thoughts. Also does anyone know of a good ice pack to use in the sauna?

Great study! I’ve only tried proper HWI a couple of times and it’s VERY miserable IMO. Far less pleasant than the sauna. It’s no surprise that it’s more effective because it’s literally just sous vide cooking you!

The sweat loss is really interesting to see though, because obviously you don’t see or feel sweaty whatsoever compared to sauna.

And yeah, cooking your testicles is a definite limitation of water immersion. Maybe good for younger guys who aren’t looking to have kids?

Coming soon to your Blueprint shopping network: Bryan Johnson Approved Testical Coolers: :wink:

Have to say though, you may get kicked out of the sauna at the gym if you walk in wearing these…



1 Like

:joy:
They won’t come close enough to me to kick me out.

Looks like it’s not so easy to fill a and keep a bathtub at 40.5ºC (105F). I could not go over 38.5ºC (101F) even with periodic refills and my core temperature only reached 37.6ºC(99.7F)

Before that I did a 4km walk and my core temp reached 37.9ºC (100.2F). On a long run I can easily reach 38.6ºC(101.5F) even on a normal cool day.

1 Like

I’m just imagining someone walking in on me in the sauna while I have an ice pack on my balls

I regularly float in my large spa enjoying the view of the cosmos above. Incredible what one sees on a clear evening (getting close to being a UFO believer). It has a max temp setting of 104F but with the insulated cover it hits 105.

The far better results for traditional sauna vs infrared sauna might be partially attributed to the fact that traditional saunas were run at 176 degrees while the far infrared were run at an average of only 113 degrees. The researchers thought that continuous operation of infrared heaters was more important than total heat.

Thus, the FIR saunas might be significantly better than what is shown in this paper (as is also evidenced by other papers they cite.)