Yes, it’s the same: 125 mg/100g = 1250 mg/kg = 1250 ppm, since one gram is one-millionth of a kilogram.
But, going back to the purpose of this discussion, the point if I remember well is: is it convenient, calorie-wise, to ingest olives as a source of EVOO polyphenols rather than EVOO?
I cannot open the database you linked, only the metabolites part, but I’m going to search some data myself, it seems strange that olives have such an edge over EVOO, in that case I would eat more of’em myself.
One point I can say is that EVOO analysis is mandatory by law, not the polyphenols, but producers are learning to exhibit this parameter as well, so you can know the value in nearly each single quality oil.
Olives do not exhibit such content on their labels. With the values you figured out it would be a moot point anyway. Another point: polyphenols are a huge class of compounds. Secoiridoids might be present mainly in the oily part and concentrate in EVOO. Just speculations, to be ascertained.
AnUser, it may be an issue of which specific polyphenols. If examining the total concentration of whatsoever polyphenols, then I agree to your point. But apparently what’s in the olive is not necessarily in EVOO and vice-versa.
I’m currently reading what’s available in this non-accessible article.
Despite the fact that at least 36 polyphenols from five different classes have been identified in the leaves and fruits of Olea europaea L., most of the studies have focussed on olive oil, and the ones existing for table olives determine only some of these compounds [[3], [4], [5],10]. In addition, it must be borne in mind that the composition of polyphenols in table olives differs from the one described for olive oil or unprocessed olives [10]. In this sense, the secoiridoids, oleuropein and ligstroside attain very high concentrations in the raw fruits, and due to their contribution to the bitter taste, they must be removed to render olives suitable for consumption.
So, how much of the secoiridoids removed in table olives? Do we have a substantial duality olive/EVOO in the types of polyphenols? Secoiridoids are one of the most important polyphenols groups in EVOO.
Good point, I’m looking at the polyphenol database, and the total polyphenol count for olives are mostly based on commercial sources: So I believe that number and that it is much greater per kcal.
But the data on individual polyphenols is non-commercial which appears to be non-table olives, like from harvest, so it is harder to believe.
Critics say they raise your risk for weight gain, heart issues, and more. But the science doesn’t support those claims.
“There’s a lot of confusion about seed oils,” says Dariush Mozaffarian, MD, DrPH, a cardiologist and the Jean Mayer professor of nutrition at Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy. The internet is full of so-called “experts” citing convincing arguments, he says. “But if you actually read the research, you’ll find that the evidence [against seed oils] is incorrect or incomplete.” It can be tricky filtering out the truth. We looked into the claims to see if you really need an oil change.
Sometimes it depends on location. I just looked the price up. Canola oil here, in a Mediterranean country, costs twice as the best EVOO I can find, organic with 650 ppm polyphenols. In countries in northern Europe it’s probably the reverse.
I don’t know about flavour, I never had a chance to taste canola. The EVOO I buy is superlative tasting, makes a simple dish of vegetables a specialty.
Gil Carvalho earlier in this thread had never bought canola oil before either and he’s from Portugal.
I’d agree EVOO tastes better but I’m unsure if it’s healthier. Especially if you can get total polyphenols from olives. It’s still very good but the saturated fat difference is not unsubstantial, along with it being replaced with polyunsaturated fats which is good for lipids.
According to cronometer
100 gr of EVOO= 884 kcal
100 gr of green olives= 145 kcal
Olives have 16.4% the calories of an equal mass of EVOO
Most outstanding polyphenols in EVOO: Hydroxityrosol, tyrosol and Oleoeuropeine.
100 gr of 625 ppm polyphenols EVOO = 62.5 mg polyphenols (this is a rare EVOO, very hi in OOPs).
100 gr of 625 ppm polyphenols Marfil olives = 62.5 mg polyphenols.
The conclusion would be that Marfil table olives have about the same secoiridoids of a very hi- P EVOO,.but with only 16% the calories.
Considering the quality of the polyphenols, that would be about X6 at equal calories, which is not X20, but remains a good multiplication factor anyway.
A few drawbacks of olives: some secoiridoids like Ligstroside are apparently lost and are only found in EVOO.
But I am convinced now that olives are pretty good as a polyphenols intake, especially so if lower calories are desired than EVOO.
EVOO of course can be used to dress salads and vegetables and to make them delicious (if the quality is good). A major drawback: scams abound in the EVOO market. Lower quality oils are sold like EVOO but they have very few polyphenols. And some true EVOOs have originally not such a high polyphenol content.
A lot of work has been done since the Lyon Diet Heart Study in 1994. I don’t believe that extremely powerful result has been replicated. It sure would be nice if we could give a little dietary counseling and provide some oil to people and reduce 70% of the heart disease in existence.
I refer you to this if you are interested. Redirecting - from 2020. Obviously it is also not the final word on the subject.
The source they used for their attempt at arguing that the LDL increase wasn’t that significant because of the size of the LDL particle that increased, did show an increase in larger LDL particles. Because of that they concluded the increase wasn’t that harmful. However the same source showed an increase in apoB, and they left this out despite another source they used that claimed that larger LDL particles wasn’t that important… also said that apoB is a better measurement of risk than LDL. Whether LDL particle size or apoB is more important is an interesting question. Especially small LDL vs. large LDL, compared with apoB.