Doug McGuff - The Area Under the Curve

I’ve only found two references to Doug McGuff across the forum. I think his ideas merit further interest of the community.

Background

McGuff wrote Body by Science, an update of Ken Hutchins’s Super Slow training protocols, which themselves evolved out of the high intensity training protocols developed by Arthur Jones of Nautilus fame (Hitchins worked with Jones).

No gimmicks in what McGuff does. His and Hutchins’s training protocols use brief very intense resistance training - as little as 12 minutes under actual load and when advanced, just once per week. One trains as much to develop capacity for intensity as anything else.

Done properly, I’ve found it safe and incredibly demanding. One needs a week to recover sufficiently to train again.

In my late 50s I trained in this manner exclusively for nearly 5 years. No “cardio” or aerobic training. My job sent me for a stress test. The cardiologist said I seemed like a marathoner.

I recently came across the following video of a talk McGuff gave. It doesn’t really promote his particular training methods, but rather the benefits and mechanisms of the benefits of strength/resistance training.

McGuff identifies Ten Biomarkers of Health

  • Muscle mass
  • Strength
  • Bone density
  • Body composition
  • Blood lipids
  • Hemodynamics
  • Glucose control
  • Aerobic capacity
  • Gene expression
  • Brain factors

Pretty non-controversial.

Its all about skeletal muscle mass

McGuff goes on to show how increased skeletal mass from strength training (see attached screen clip) beneficially affects all of these biomarkers.

re: Gene expression

Of particular interest he cites a study wherein, a Dr. Simon Melov identified 179 genes related to aging that reverted back to youthful levels of expression from 26 weeks of strength training.

Subjects of the study realized a 50% increase in strength. Not certain how they measured it.

McGuff claims this as the first successfully observed reversal of aging at the genetic level in humans.

(The forum may have others McGuff doesn’t know about, by still…)

re: the affects on Body Composition

From his slide:

  • Its not just calories in/calories out
  • Your body’s tissues in competition
  • Myokines shift the home field advantage toward lean muscle
  • IL-I5 leverages the battle
  • mTOR/AMP balanced

Worth the watch.

4 Likes

Interesting, but a lot of overstated claims IMO

It’s a bit silly to say “Its all about skeletal muscle mass” when bodybuilders and plenty of other athletes drop dead (often from cardiac issues), despite the benefits in strength, glucose handling etc.

That said, I do strongly agree that having more muscle is generally better than less, for most people, most of the time. Most people will likely benefit from integrating resistance training. However, this does not offset a multitude of other risk factors - many of which are genetically determined. Having a mindset of “I work out and I’m in good shape, therefore I’m fine” is a false hope.

1 Like

Yes. You have to jump the cardiovascular hurdle before anything else will make you live longer, IMHO. It’s just too big of a killer.

1 Like

12 min a week seems absurd. Are there studies showing benefits following this method?
The more I study the more I realise that we need to workout every day.