Could mending damaged DNA prolong life? (Nature)

Inspired by long-lived animals — and human centenarians — researchers are hunting for ways to enhance DNA repair and extend healthspan.

Your DNA is under constant assault. Ultraviolet light, environmental toxins, reactive molecules made during run-of-the-mill metabolism and many other disruptors muck with the instructions that keep life humming along. Thankfully, repair crews are at the ready.

A typical cell can acquire up to a whopping 100,000 lesions each day. “The vast, vast majority are repaired,” says Morten Scheibye-Knudsen, a translational geroscientist at the University of Copenhagen. “We have very, very efficient repair.”

That’s a good thing for a couple of reasons. First, unrepaired or poorly repaired damage can introduce mutations, which can contribute to cancer. And second, DNA damage seems to be one of the main drivers of ageing.

Researchers are amassing evidence that this type of damage underlies many of the hallmarks of ageing, including chronic inflammation, metabolic malfunctions and protein-folding problems1. Such damage triggers cellular alarm bells that can promote inflammation, force cells into an ‘undead’ state known as senescence and even kill them. These responses help the body to grow and thrive, but they become more problematic as we age. The accumulation of beleaguered cells over time is associated with many age-related conditions, including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and Alzheimer’s.

That raises a question: if DNA damage is at the root of ageing, can boosting DNA repair slow the process, keeping people healthy for longer? For the first time, this is starting to look like a promising approach, say researchers who study DNA repair2.

Their new optimism comes from studying relatively long-lived species, such as bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus)3 and naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber)4, and looking at the genetics of human centenarians. These studies are pointing to the existence of a great variety of molecular maintenance workers that make for a long and healthy life. A ‘master regulator’ of repair, discovered in 2023, also suggests that these fix-it systems could be enhanced in unison5.

Such findings come alongside a booming interest in longevity more generally, propelled by biotechnology companies, health influencers and governments overseeing ageing populations.

“If you can reduce DNA damage, you would probably have a dramatic effect on the ageing process,” says Paul Robbins, who directs the Nathan Shock Center on Genome Integrity and Aging, which opened last year at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “There are tricks that we can do. But it’s not simple.”

That finding chimes with a study from 2019, in which Gorbunova and her colleagues looked at 18 rodent species with varying lifespans. They found a strong link between the maximum lifespan and the accuracy and efficiency of double-strand break repair in skin and lung cells6. That superior repair was explained in large part by one member of a family of enzymes called sirtuins, which are known to have roles in ageing, metabolism and the stability of the genome. The overexpression of the sirtuin SIRT6 had already been linked to extended lifespan in mice. In the 2019 study, the team identified five amino acids that differ between the beaver and mouse versions of SIRT6 and seem to make the beaver version more effective. Beavers live for 10–12 years in the wild, whereas mice typically live for a few years at most.

Genetic studies suggest that some human centenarians7 might also carry a superior variant of the gene SIRT6, says geneticist Jan Vijg at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City. Vijg co-leads a multiteam effort to identify important genes and pathways in centenarians, validate them and develop drugs that target them.

The team has identified a group of compounds called fucoidans, which occur naturally in brown seaweed and activate the SIRT6 protein, as potential therapeutics. Studies by Robbins, Gorbunova and others8,9 show that supplementing mouse diets with fucoidans improves the animals’ DNA repair, reduces senescence and extends their healthspan and lifespan.

Clinician-geroscientist Andrea Maier, director of the National University of Singapore’s Academy for Healthy Longevity, is now leading a study that gives fucoidans to men aged 50 to 80. The study is looking at cellular markers of ageing and clinical outcomes, measuring as directly as possible how fucoidans affect biology.

Read the Full story:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02385-9

1 Like

From the above story:

“Our germ cells are in a sense immortal,” Schumacher says.

He and his colleagues have identified a possible key to this immortality. In 2023, the team reported from experiments in the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans that a protein complex already known for its role in cell proliferation represses many DNA-repair genes in non-reproductive, or somatic, cells5. This ‘DREAM complex’ is found across species. When the team turned it off in a mouse model of a premature-ageing syndrome, the mice showed less DNA damage. Switching it off in human cells boosted the expression of DNA-repair genes.

And the paper referenced: The DREAM complex functions as conserved master regulator of somatic DNA-repair capacities | Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

and a paper summary:

Releasing the Handbrake: One Repressor Complex Is Capping Your Cells’ Ability to Fix Their Own DNA

Every cell in your body carries the full genetic toolkit for near-perfect DNA repair, but somatic cells deliberately switch most of it off. This paper identifies the switch. A transcriptional repressor called the DREAM complex sits on the promoters of essentially every major DNA repair pathway in body tissues and holds them down, while germ cells (sperm and egg precursors) run those same genes at full throttle. Knock out DREAM components in the worm C. elegans and somatic cells adopt a germline-like repair program: they clear UV lesions roughly twice as fast, survive ultraviolet light, ionising radiation, alkylating agents and cisplatin, and resist the lifespan shortening that DNA damage normally causes. The same logic holds in human cells, where the DYRK1A inhibitors harmine and INDY disassemble DREAM, boost repair gene expression, and roughly halve damage-induced cell death. In progeroid Ercc1-deficient mice, two weeks of harmine reduced DNA damage markers and photoreceptor apoptosis in the retina. The work is mechanistically strong and translationally very early. [Confidence: High for the C. elegans biology, Low for human relevance]

Biologists have long known an awkward fact about the human body: it does not repair its own DNA as well as it could. Germ cells, the lineage that becomes sperm and eggs, maintain their genomes with extraordinary fidelity across generations. The rest of the body, the soma, accumulates mutations orders of magnitude faster. The standard explanation has been evolutionary economics. Natural selection only needs the germline to be pristine; the body is a disposable vehicle, and repair is expensive.

What has never been clear is whether this restraint is a hard biological limit or an adjustable setting. This paper argues it is a setting, and it names the dial.

A team led by Bjorn Schumacher at the University of Cologne report that a conserved transcriptional repressor, the DREAM complex, binds the promoters of DNA repair genes across the board and keeps them switched off in body tissues. This is not a pathway-specific brake. DREAM sits on nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair, mismatch repair, base excision repair, crosslink repair and non-homologous end joining simultaneously. It is, in the authors’ framing, a master regulator of how much repair capacity a somatic cell is permitted to have.

Break DREAM in a worm and the soma starts behaving like a germ cell. Mutant worms cleared UV lesions about twice as fast as normal animals. They shrugged off doses of ultraviolet light, radiation, and chemotherapy drugs that stalled the development of their wild-type siblings. Most striking, when DNA damage was used to shorten their lives, the mutants lost roughly half as much lifespan as normal worms did.

The finding extends beyond worms. DREAM assembly depends on a kinase called DYRK1A, and two chemical DYRK1A inhibitors reproduced the effect in human cells, cutting damage-induced cell death by roughly half. In mice engineered to age prematurely through a DNA repair defect, two weeks of the DYRK1A inhibitor harmine reduced DNA damage markers in the retina and protected light-sensing neurons from dying.

The caveats are substantial. The mouse work lasted twelve days and measured no survival. DREAM is built around the retinoblastoma protein, one of biology’s foundational tumour suppressors, and the paper does not examine cancer risk at all. Harmine is a blunt tool with significant off-target activity. But the central claim, that somatic repair capacity is throttled rather than maxed out, and that the throttle is a druggable protein complex, is a genuinely new idea about why bodies age. [Confidence: High that the mechanism is real; Low that it becomes a human therapy in its current form]

Actionable Insights

There is nothing here to act on yet, and the most useful takeaway is understanding why.

The intervention worked in worms and in a mouse strain engineered to have broken DNA repair from birth. Both are damage-rescue models. In healthy animals the effect vanishes or reverses: worms carrying DREAM mutations lived no longer than normal without added damage, and three of the four mutant strains actually lived shorter lives under ordinary conditions. This is a damage-resistance intervention, not a longevity intervention.

On magnitude: in mutant worms, DNA lesion removal roughly doubled (22 percent of lesions cleared in 24 hours versus 44 percent in mutants, Cohen’s d around 3.8 but with a confidence interval running from 1.1 to 6.4 because only three replicates were used). In progeroid mouse retinas, harmine cut dying photoreceptors by roughly half (Cohen’s d around 1.8, confidence interval 0.6 to 3.1). In human cells, damage-induced death fell from about 38 percent to about 20 percent, a relative reduction near 47 percent. Those are large effects, measured in small samples, in artificial damage settings.

One safety note. Harmine is sold as a supplement and is a potent MAO-A inhibitor. Combining it with antidepressants or tyramine-rich foods risks serotonin syndrome or hypertensive crisis. Do not self-experiment on the basis of this paper. [Confidence: High]

Context and Source

  • Open Access Paper: The DREAM complex functions as conserved master regulator of somatic DNA-repair capacities.
  • Institutions: Institute for Genome Stability in Aging and Disease, CECAD and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany. Mouse work performed at the Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • Countries: Germany and Greece.
  • Journal: Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, published 23 March 2023.
  • Competing interests: Bjorn Schumacher and George Garinis are co-founders of Agevio Therapeutics, Inc. This is a direct commercial interest in the therapeutic target described. Readers should weight the translational framing accordingly.
  • Impact evaluation: The impact score of this journal is 10.1 (2024 Journal Citation Reports, down from 12.5 in 2023), evaluated against a typical high-end range of 0 to 60+ for top general science, therefore this is a High impact journal.

Biomarker Data with Effect Sizes

Human Cell Apoptosis

Quiescent U2OS cells, 24 hours after genotoxic insult, n = 3 biological replicates. Values read from Figure 5:

Condition Control Treated Relative risk Absolute reduction
UV plus harmine ~38% apoptotic ~20% 0.53 18 points
UV plus INDY ~45% ~27% 0.60 18 points
MMS plus harmine ~82% ~50% 0.61 32 points
MMS plus INDY ~82% ~35% 0.43 47 points

Adjusting for the roughly 10 to 13 percent baseline apoptosis in undamaged cells, the reduction in damage-attributable death is larger still, on the order of 60 to 70 percent for the UV condition. Neither drug increased apoptosis in undamaged cells, which is a useful negative result for tolerability.

Bottom Line

The core discovery is solid and conceptually important: a single conserved transcriptional repressor caps somatic DNA repair capacity, and removing it produces germline-like repair in body tissue. The C. elegans evidence supporting that claim is thorough and internally consistent. [Confidence: High]

The therapeutic extrapolation is preliminary in the strict sense. It rests on a twelve-day experiment in a progeroid mouse strain with a non-selective drug, measuring histological markers rather than function or survival, analysed without blinding and with pseudoreplicated statistics.