FWIW…
This paper is buried in another thread.
Should have a posting on it own.
Will give you good understanding of the mechanisms of taurine.
FWIW…
This paper is buried in another thread.
Should have a posting on it own.
Will give you good understanding of the mechanisms of taurine.
Thanks for underlining this interesting article, that includes among other things details on the anti-atherosclerotic effects of taurine and black pepper terpenes
There is no money in non-IP compound’s.
FWIW, if you are taking taurine you should be taken black pepper/piperine and grape seed extract{review the post]with the taurine.
Edited on 10/07/2024 at 12:07pm EST
from the paper;
…“Based on previous dosages used in the literature and clinical studies, we propose a theoretical dose of 500 mg –3 g of taurine [115,173,176,177,223] and 5 –150 mg of black pepper extract [69,105,162] to be taken orally in capsule form, twice a day. Further clinical studies are required to confirm this hypothesis that a combined taurine and black pepper supplementation may be a viable adjunct treatment of CVD and its complications in humans.”…
So true unfortunately. Yet I find at least a little room for optimism via the small levels of NIH funds thrown in this general area. And look at how we know what we know about more than a handful of non-IP compounds, such as taurine. I would think that a dedicated group might be able to demonstrate the merit of increasing funding. Just reflecting on my own experiences, several non-IP supplements have improved one or more of my health metrics with a high degree of confidence.
Yes, very interesting but there is a conflict of interest regarding the product that was used for the paper.
“The author A.Z. is in current discussions with the manufacturer of PhytoCann BP®; however, the insights presented in this paper were arrived at independently and the views expressed are those of the authors. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.”
What does non-IP mean?
Intellectual Property - patentable stuff.