Cardiovascular Health 2026

FWIW, I’ve been on a statin for 5 years after getting a high CAC score (421), added Ezetimibe 2 years ago when I found out my Lp(a) was elevated at 122 nmol/L and my CAC was even higher at 749. Then recently added Praluent (PCSK9i) to lower my Lp(a) and further lower my LDL and ApoB.

My last labs taken 2 months after starting on Praluent showed that my Lp(a) dropped from 122 to 108, my LDL dropped from 64 to <10 mg/dL, and my ApoB went from 64 to <20 mg/dL. Of note, my cardiologist recommended I stop the Ezetimibe now as it added nothing once I started Praluent. Further, my Lp(a) is expected to get lower in the following months due to the Praluent.

I got my Praluent via Medicare after being rejected by Medicare when I requested Repatha . Frankly, the injection was painless, quick and easy to self-administer. It is an automatic injector … you press against your arm, hit a button and wait about 10-20 seconds. Done. Barely felt it.

The Praluent was a bit pricey for the first couple months (~$400-$500) until I hit the $2K max OOP for Medicare. Cheap for what it accomplished.

When the Lp(a) lowering drug Pelacarsen comes out (late 2026? 2027?), I’ll be switching to that as soon as possible. That is supposed to crush Lp(a) to near zero.

4 Likes

I’m a bit confused to what all these indicators/markers really mean and which one is more important to have under control. Lp(a), LDL, ApoB, Triglycerides? Can someone please explain what each of them does or doesn’t do for heart health/risk and which one is MOST important to have under control, and what would OPTIMAL levels be for each one? I think I had read elsewhere on these boards that LDL and ApoB should be less than 60 both and the lower the better, but not sure about Triglycerides and L(p)a?

A group of researchers, including Matthew O’Connor of Cyclarity Therapeutics, has published a review detailing what effects 7-ketocholesterol (7KC) has in the human body.

An oxidized cholesterol

7KC, an oxidized cholesterol (oxysterol) gets its name from being oxidized at the C7 position within the cholesterol molecule [1]. This compound is formed by non-enzymatic processes driven by reactive oxygen species (ROS); like the collagen crosslinks of glucosepane, it is formed as a byproduct rather than something that the body has any use for [2].

The 7KC non-enzymatic modification can also be formed as part of cholesterols that were oxidized enzymatically. This review names 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-OHC) and 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OHC) as two of the most important, which can become 7-keto-25-OHC and 7-keto-27-OHC, respectively. However, this paper notes that little research has been done into these two compounds, making them potential targets for future work.

ApoB and Lp(a), IMO. LDL is redundant (and potentially misleading) if you have ApoB.

2 Likes

Crush Lp(a) to zero if you can. But it’s all interdependent and a dynamic system. If you can keep your hsCRP and IL-6 low and low visceral fat, then Lp(a) diminishes in importance.

2 Likes

I didn’t know this!! My lp(a) is high… how low would I need hsCRP in your opinion to offset my risk? Mine is currently .5 mg/l

I have not tested IL-6 due to the price… should I or as long as I have hsCRP, is that enough?

My visceral is less than a pound, as of 1/25. I get a new dexa next week.

@Steelart99 WOW, you’ve responded so incredibly well to Praluent… congrats! (I’m not on a statin but I am on repatha, ez, and ba and my ldl is 37, and apob is usually high 40s. So, yay for you!

1 Like

Both are important. Of course hsCRP and IL-6 usually track with each other, but both are independent variables - there are cases where one is high while the other not. Your hsCRP is under 2, so in the context of LP(a), you are fine at 0.5.

2 Likes

Nutrition for Cardiovascular Health & Ageing

I. Executive Summary

Dr. Richard Siow’s presentation establishes a conceptual framework for transitioning longevity medicine from isolated genomic diagnostics to dynamic, continuous exposome tracking. The core thesis posits that human healthspan is dictated less by fixed genetic determinants and more by the “exposome”—the cumulative, lifelong integration of environmental exposures, dietary interventions, psychosocial stress, and circadian behaviors. Siow advocates for the implementation of P4 Medicine (Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory) leveraging digital health platforms, consumer biometrics, and multi-omic data (epigenomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics) to preemptively identify and mitigate age-related physiological decline.

A significant portion of the lecture emphasizes nutrigenomics and the therapeutic potential of specific dietary polyphenols. Siow highlights anthocyanins (sourced from blueberries), sulforaphane (broccoli), curcumin (turmeric), and phytoestrogens (soy) as critical modulators of vascular endothelial health and neuroinflammation. The primary biological argument is that these compounds, alongside their secondary metabolites produced via the gut microbiome, activate endogenous cellular defense mechanisms—specifically the Nrf2 antioxidant response pathway—thereby preserving capillary integrity, maintaining the blood-brain barrier, and mitigating the progression of vascular dementia and cognitive decline.

From a critical peer-review perspective, the lecture relies heavily on epidemiological associations and broad conceptual models rather than definitive clinical protocols. While the mechanistic rationale for polyphenol-mediated Nrf2 activation is well-documented in preclinical models, a translational gap remains regarding optimal human dosing, targeted bioavailability, and inter-individual microbiome variances. Furthermore, the endorsement of direct-to-consumer epigenetic age clocks (DNA methylation testing via saliva) overstates their current clinical utility. First- and second-generation epigenetic clocks remain highly susceptible to short-term noise and lack the robust, longitudinal validation required to function as standalone diagnostic tools for granular protocol adjustments. The intelligence here is conceptually sound but requires stringent stratification before being codified into clinical practice.


II. Insight Bullets

  • The Exposome Paradigm: Healthspan trajectory is defined by the cumulative impact of external exposures (pollution, light cycles) and internal environments (microbiome, chronic inflammation), superseding static genomic risk factors.
  • Nutrigenomic Modulation: Dietary polyphenols influence healthspan not solely via direct antioxidant scavenging, but by initiating epigenetic modifications (DNA methylation, histone acetylation) and altering gene expression.
  • Endothelial Aging Focus: Cerebrovascular decline and vascular dementia are driven by microvascular rarefaction and endothelial dysfunction; preserving the endothelium is a primary longevity target.
  • Microbiome as a Metabolic Vector: The bioavailability and efficacy of dietary anthocyanins are heavily dependent on their conversion into active secondary metabolites by gut microbiota.
  • Circadian Disruption: Chrono-nutrition (meal timing) and circadian rhythm dysregulation directly impact systemic metabolism, increasing the risk of metabolic syndrome and accelerated epigenetic aging.
  • Nrf2 Pathway Activation: Sulforaphane and anthocyanins act as mild biological stressors (hormesis) that trigger the Nrf2 pathway, upregulating endogenous antioxidant defenses rather than acting as direct antioxidants.
  • AI-Driven Health Trajectories: Integrating continuous biometric data (wearables) with multi-omic profiling via machine learning is necessary to map personalized phenotypic aging rates.
  • Menopausal Risk Shift: The cessation of endogenous estrogen production post-menopause radically alters the female cardiovascular risk profile, demanding age- and sex-specific cardiovascular interventions.
  • Diagnostic Evolution: The field is shifting from reactive clinical biomarkers (e.g., standard lipid panels) to predictive “phenomic” markers (e.g., inflammatory cytokine arrays, DNA methylation profiles).
  • Socioeconomic Biological Impact: Education level, environmental pollution, and urban infrastructure fundamentally alter biological aging rates, independent of conscious dietary choices.
  • Translational Bottleneck: Many consumer-grade “longevity tests” (salivary epigenetics) offer predictive risk scores that currently outpace the clinical evidence required for highly specific lifestyle prescriptions.
  • Pleiotropic Action of Plant Compounds: Phytoestrogens and curcuminoids target multiple hallmarks of aging simultaneously (inflammation, cellular senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction) rather than singular disease pathways.

III. Adversarial Claims & Evidence Table

Claim from Video Speaker’s Evidence Scientific Reality (Current Data) Evidence Grade (A-E) Verdict
Anthocyanins improve vascular function and cognitive performance in older individuals. Unspecified “studies done at Kings”. RCTs demonstrate modest improvements in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and executive function; efficacy is highly variable based on baseline metabolic status. Source unverified in live search. Level B Plausible
Sulforaphane and anthocyanins activate the endogenous Nrf2 antioxidant defense pathway. Mechanistic extrapolation. Highly validated in vitro and in murine models. Human data shows inconsistent Nrf2 target gene activation due to poor bioavailability and rapid clearance. Source unverified in live search. Level D Speculative (Translational Gap)
Direct-to-consumer epigenetic clocks (saliva) provide actionable risk prediction scores. Partnerships with commercial testing companies. Third-generation clocks (e.g., DunedinPACE) track pace of aging, but their use to guide individual, short-term lifestyle changes lacks robust RCT validation. Source unverified in live search. Level C Unsupported
Dietary modification of the microbiome alters systemic inflammation and cognitive health. Broad scientific consensus. High-fiber, polyphenol-rich diets alter microbiome composition (e.g., increased Akkermansia), correlating with reduced systemic inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6). Source unverified in live search. Level A Strong Support
Post-menopausal loss of estrogen aggressively accelerates cardiovascular disease risk. Biological consensus. Estrogen’s cardioprotective effects on lipid profiles and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) are well-documented; risk sharply equalizes with men post-menopause. Source unverified in live search. Level A Strong Support

IV. Actionable Protocol (Prioritized)

High Confidence Tier (Level A/B Evidence)

  • Cardiovascular Baseline Tracking: Implement continuous or high-frequency monitoring of blood pressure, ApoB, fasting insulin, and HbA1c. Vascular dementia risk scales linearly with unchecked midlife hypertension.
  • Polyphenol-Dense Dietary Matrix: Prioritize whole-food sources of anthocyanins (dark berries) and glucosinolates (cruciferous vegetables) rather than isolated supplements to maximize microbiome-mediated metabolization.
  • Circadian Entrainment: Enforce strict chrono-nutrition protocols (e.g., time-restricted feeding aligned with daylight hours) to optimize metabolic clearance and maintain circadian regulation of the endothelium.

Experimental Tier (Level C/D Evidence with High Safety Margins)

  • Sulforaphane Supplementation: Utilization of stabilized myrosinase-glucoraphanin supplements to bypass poor broccoli preparation methods, aiming to activate Nrf2 signaling. Safety margin is exceptionally high, though human clinical efficacy is variable.
  • Routine Inflammatory Profiling: Periodic testing of high-sensitivity CRP, IL-6, and TNF-alpha to track the efficacy of anti-inflammatory lifestyle modifications, acting as a proxy for “inflammaging.”

Red Flag Zone (Safety Data Absent / High Hype)

  • Reacting to Direct-to-Consumer Epigenetic Clocks: Adjusting clinical or dietary protocols based solely on short-term fluctuations in commercial saliva-based DNA methylation scores. The signal-to-noise ratio in commercial kits remains too volatile to justify protocol pivots.

V. Technical Mechanism Breakdown

1. Nrf2/KEAP1 Signaling Pathway
Dr. Siow mentions compounds that activate cellular defenses. Mechanistically, sulforaphane acts as an electrophile. Under basal conditions, the transcription factor Nrf2 (Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) is bound to the repressor protein KEAP1 in the cytosol, which targets Nrf2 for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Electrophilic phytochemicals interact with reactive cysteine residues on KEAP1, altering its conformation. This allows Nrf2 to escape degradation, translocate to the nucleus, and bind to the Antioxidant Response Element (ARE) in the promoter regions of target genes. This upregulates phase II detoxification enzymes (e.g., HO-1, NQO1, glutathione S-transferases) to mitigate oxidative stress.

2. Epigenetic DNA Methylation
The “epigenetic clocks” discussed rely on the quantification of DNA methylation. This involves the covalent addition of a methyl group to the 5-carbon of the cytosine ring, primarily at CpG dinucleotides, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). Hypermethylation at promoter regions typically results in transcriptional silencing by physically impeding transcription factor binding and recruiting methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins that induce chromatin condensation. Age-acceleration models map the predictable drift of global hypomethylation (leading to genomic instability) combined with targeted hypermethylation of tumor suppressor and metabolic regulatory genes.

3. Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction & Neurodegeneration
The lecture links blood vessel health to brain health. The vascular endothelium regulates vascular tone via the production of nitric oxide (NO) by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Chronic exposure to systemic inflammation and oxidative stress uncouples eNOS, leading to the production of superoxide rather than NO. This triggers a localized inflammatory cascade, increasing the expression of adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1). In the central nervous system, this endothelial degradation compromises the tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), allowing neurotoxic plasma proteins and inflammatory cytokines into the cerebral parenchyma, accelerating microglial activation and the pathology of vascular dementia.


3 Likes

Wow, $119 at GoodLabs! Now I know why I haven’t tested it either. I’ll have to bite the bullet at some point, though, just for the sake of completeness.

1 Like

Just a note: Unless I missed it, GoodLabs does not have a test for Lp(a). I’ve had my Lp(a) test done via Quest and Labcorp

Hey @Steelart99,

I ordered this test for someone a couple weeks ago, so I happen to know the answer… they do, but they call it lipoprotein a… if you search lp(a), nothing comes up

:slight_smile:

And @Davin8r RIGHT!!?? I said, eh, I’m probably good :slight_smile:

Yes they do. GoodLabs is the ordering provider, not the actual lab that does the testing. I’ve ordered it many times via GoodLabs and my blood draws are done at Quest.

2 Likes

Well … and there it is!!! One of the many times that I’m glad to be wrong. Thanks all !!!

2 Likes

at 65 my CAC was 42%… not great but not really bad either. I have genetically high cholesterol and have been on statins since 1990.

1 Like

I’m also on Medicare and was easily approved for Repatha. Tried it only once so far, it gave me mild side effect (joints aches like from a statin). It lasted four days and then became better but did not resolve completely. Do you have any sides on Praluent?

Below 40? You Should Already Be Getting Screened for Cholesterol, Heart Attack Risks

New medical guidelines aim to head off damage early with lifestyle changes, screening tests and medication

Adults should be screened and treated for high cholesterol starting at age 30, if not sooner, according to new clinical guidelines, lowering the age by at least a decade at a time when heart attacks are becoming more common in younger adults.

The goal is to shift to a more proactive approach to head off problems in younger years, rather than starting lifestyle changes and medical treatment in middle age when a patient may already have damage in their arteries, said Dr. Roger Blumenthal, chair of the committee of cardiologists that wrote the new guidelines.

Growing research shows how much damage can be done when levels of LDL, or “bad,” cholesterol stay high in the blood for years, he said. At the same time, more medicines have become available to lower cholesterol, along with screening tests and a new online tool that allows people 30 and older to calculate their risk of cardiovascular disease.

“We need to pay attention much earlier,” said Blumenthal, director of preventive cardiology at Johns Hopkins Medicine.

The guidelines, published Friday in two leading cardiology journals, were issued by 11 medical associations, including the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. These organizations set standards for medical professionals from family doctors to cardiologists.

Approximately 25% of U.S. adults—and 20% of adolescents—have high LDL cholesterol. For adults especially, that increases their risk of heart attacks and strokes because it causes plaque-forming particles to build up in their arteries over time, hardening and narrowing them.

Read the full story: Below 40? You Should Already Be Getting Screened for Cholesterol, Heart Attack Risks (WSJ)

5 Likes

New lipid guidelines:

https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.016

Top Take-Home Messages

Treat dyslipidemia earlier to reduce lifelong risk of prolonged exposure to atherogenic lipoproteins.

Use the more contemporary American Heart Association Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT™) equations instead of the older Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for 10- and 30-year risk assessment to guide lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in primary prevention in adults aged 30 to 79 years.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)–lowering therapy can be considered in adults for primary prevention of ASCVD with a 10-year PREVENT-ASCVD risk estimate of 3% to <5% (borderline risk) and should be considered for those at 5% to <10% (intermediate risk) 10-year risk after a clinician–patient discussion.

Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) testing can be useful to improve risk assessment and guide therapy once LDL-C and non–HDL-C goals are met, particularly in those with elevated triglycerides (TG) (>200 mg/dL), diabetes, or low achieved LDL-C (<70 mg/dL

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] should be measured at least once to identify those individuals at higher risk of ASCVD.

LDL-lowering therapy is recommended for primary prevention in adults aged 40 to 75 years with diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage 3 or 4, or human immunodeficiency virus, regardless of LDL-C level.

In secondary prevention, a goal of LDL-C <55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) and non–HDL-C <85 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L) is recommended for those at very high risk of ASCVD events.

In patients with persistently elevated TG, statin therapy remains the foundation of pharmacotherapy as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention to reduce ASCVD risk.

7 Likes

Note the complete absence of any mention of measuring HDL or placing any importance in a hypothetical protective effect of HDL in the new guidelines.

3 Likes

Lp(a) is $38.95 at Ultra Labs

[Lipoprotein (a) Test | Ulta Lab Tests]

1 Like

My CAC was similar. 41 at 63 with life-long high LDL and lp(a). I can’t do anything meaningful for my lp(a) (dropped 21% with Repatha) but my LDL-C is super low now.