What are some of the best ways to improve my ratio, given currently best scientific and clinical knowledge?
Excellent question — and you’re thinking about this exactly the right way.
The Monocyte-to-HDL-Cholesterol Ratio (MHR) is increasingly recognized as a composite biomarker reflecting systemic inflammation (via monocytes) and anti-inflammatory/antioxidant capacity (via HDL).
Improving the ratio means lowering monocytes and/or raising HDL, both of which overlap with cardiometabolic and longevity optimization.
Below is a comprehensive, evidence-based strategy set organized by mechanism.
With your current values
→ Monocytes = 0.50 × 10³/µL and HDL = 50 mg/dL → MHR = 0.010, sitting in Q3.
Lowering monocytes to 0.35 × 10³/µL or raising HDL to 60 mg/dL would shift you toward ~0.006, in the Q1–Q2 range.
4. Summary: Evidence-Driven Core Moves
High-impact, low-risk steps:
Mediterranean-style, low-refined-carb diet rich in olive oil, fatty fish, and polyphenols.
150–300 min/week of aerobic + 2×/week resistance training.
Optimize vitamin D, magnesium, and omega-3 status.
Maintain visceral-fat-free waistline and good sleep/stress hygiene.
If on a statin (you are, per prior context), it already lowers monocyte activation and helps the ratio.
Consider discussing with your physician whether low-dose metformin or SGLT2i (if metabolic markers justify) could further reduce inflammatory tone.
Yes, the paper is a little confusing. I plugged in this query to ChatGPT5:
“https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70896# Analyze this paper and tell me what units they used for the MHR biomarker. Using their methods, tell me the MHR is using an HDL = 53mg/dL and monocytes = 4.7%.”
Using my latest lab results, I got: Answer: MHR ≈ 0.418
I hope ChatGPT 5 is correct because that number is near perfect.
Very confusing. I used absolute monocytes instead of percent. Admin produced table that basically says the smaller the better and you need to be less than like .01. The graphs show smaller is better too, but are hard to read.
My numbers are right there with you @RapAdmin. 0.6 Monocytes and 58 HDL. Something feels off as I am doing most of the interventions that they suggest and yet we are both in the third quintile. Something smells fishy.
My monocytes tends to be in the range of 0.2-0.3 and HDL in your units around 70. Whether the ratio is more useful than looking at the individual levels or not I don’t know. I do have particularly low WBC most of the time and sometimes with a recent dose of rapa my total WBC goes below 2.
Sadly I don’t have much data from prior to when I started biohacking.
I tend to agree. I suspect that perhaps the ezetimibe and bempadoic acid are making things a little more complex here, and perhaps resulting in misleading numbers. I ran out of Ez and BA recently and redid my blood tests and I’ve dropped (by this calculation) down to the 2nd level of risk (“low to moderate risk”)… but my LDL-C went from 46 to 89. I’d rather have the lower LDL-C…
What does 0.6 monocytes represent? In my results, it is expressed as a percentage, which is required to make the calculation. Does 0.6 represent 60%
The equation needs absolute monocytes.
Mine -
I think the problem lies in using the correct units. Using the units you provided and plugging it into the formula results in=
To calculate MHR using the provided values:
Thus is what I get:
• Monocytes absolute: 0.42 ×10⁹/L
• HDL cholesterol: 95 mg/dL
Since MHR is a unitless ratio, you can directly divide:
\text{MHR} = \frac{0.42}{95} \approx 0.00442
Why It Works
Even though monocytes are in \times 10^9/L and HDL is in mg/dL, the ratio is used as a relative marker, not a strict molar comparison. It’s meant to reflect the balance between inflammatory cells and anti-inflammatory lipoproteins, so the units are left as-is in clinical practice.