Canagliflozin - Another Top Longevity Drug

Frailty, Not Age, Drives Risks With SGLT2, GLP-1 Drugs in Older Adults

Cardiometabolic drugs such as SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists offer substantial benefits for older adults, but clinicians should base prescribing decisions on a patient’s frailty and comorbidities rather than age alone, experts said at the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting.

SGLT2 inhibitors are linked to side effects such as genital infections, dehydration, and dizziness, which may increase the risk for falls in older adults. GLP-1 drugs often cause nausea and weight loss, which may be harmful in patients already at risk for frailty or muscle loss.

“The key thing is that risk is vulnerability dependent, not age dependent,” said Chintan Dave, PhD, associate professor of pharmacy and epidemiology at Rutgers University School of Public Health in New Brunswick, New Jersey.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/frailty-not-age-drives-risks-sglt2-glp-1-drugs-older-adults-2026a1000ef9

6 Likes

Without knowing facts, I will stick up for her.

She has always been rail thin with no detectable body fat. My guess this is just how her skinny face is naturally aging.

She could make her face look different if she used filler, but then people would critique her for that… so…….

2 Likes

Has this study been posted on the site? Search doesn’t come up with it.

Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in early Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized controlled trial

3 Likes

I think this is from last year: Canagliflozin - Another Top Longevity Drug - #1818 by RapAdmin

Posted here in April 2024 (yes, more than a year before the actual publication date) by yours truly :sunglasses: Canagliflozin - Another Top Longevity Drug - #750 by adssx

7 Likes

Rats, that’s why the title didn’t come up in search. That was before I joined the site in August of that year. I should have known, no way would you miss an RCT involving dapa and dementia. The study is small, and short duration, but still somewhat interesting.

3 Likes

Yes, multiple generics now approves in the US as of April, see eg

5 Likes

Just want to confirm that I was able to get a 3 month supply of Dapagliflozin, 10mg for a total of $30 with express shipping. Would have been $15 with regular shipping.

11 Likes

For those who take resistance training seriously: how have SGLT2 inhibitors affected your progress in muscle strength and hypertrophy? Are you doing anything specific to minimize potential negative effects besides the basics like maintaining high protein intake and training regularly?

1 Like

It didn’t change anything for me

1 Like

I have hard time understanding this study (I’m sure I’m missing something). Why would placebo group have a 65% increase in telomere, that is huge? and how was it measured? I’m assuming it was a before and after measurement, or probably it was compared to a controlled group of random (other) people?
I mean what the heck if placebo gives an increase of 65% might as well take the placebo? Unless I’m missing something, this is very weird. I mean I’ve seen placebo have say an effect of 10% on other studies but 65% is HUGE. As it stands right now, I have zero confidence in this study. You don’t just feed people corn starch/placebo and all of the sudden their telomeres lengthen by 65%.

1 Like

I switched from metformin to an slgt2. I am a 53 year old male and I noticed no difference in strength or muscle size. That said, I am much more veiny. Keeping fat off always take work but it is less work with an slgt2. I get lots of compliments on my low body fat percentage at the gym and in public.

4 Likes

Hormone replacement therapy would offset this imo. Same with muscle loss on GLP1s.

1 Like

@Cole answered there:

2 Likes

Dissecting out the unexpected effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on human aging

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1210/clinem/dgag207/8677988?

2 Likes

Was there any dose specific data or is it in general terms.

It’s a comprehensive review paper. It not only discusses their glucose lowering properties (and related effects) but also other systemic effects. Overall, the author’s conclusion is to be careful with off-label use until more data is available. (I think all scientists would generally strike this tone at this point…we are a careful lot).

From the Conclusions " Collectively, SGLT2 inhibitors must ultimately demonstrate
their antiaging efficacy as well as safety in clinical studies before
they can be implemented as senotherapeutics in society. At present,
it is essential to avoid premature clinical use based solely
on encouraging findings from preclinical studies. In reality, conducting
clinical trials that evaluate antiaging effects using hard
endpoints such as lifespan is impractical due to the requirement
of enormous sample size, long intervention and/or observation
periods, and prohibitive costs required. To address this challenge,
we have started a clinical study in older adults that evaluates
antiaging effects by measuring biological age estimated by
epigenetic clocks method in peripheral blood leukocytes (Trial
ID: jRCTs031250234). If this study demonstrates that SGLT2 inhibitors
attenuate the progression of biological aging, it would
represent a major advance with substantial scientific and societal
implications.

Nevertheless, it is crucial to emphasize that the antiaging or
senolytic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in humans remain unproven.
Off-label use for antiaging purposes should therefore be strictly
avoided at this stage. Carefully designed, adequately powered
clinical trials are required to determine whether these agents truly
modify biological aging processes in humans. Importantly, reductions
in cardiovascular or renal events do not automatically
equate to slow biological aging and validated aging biomarkers
must be rigorously evaluated.

3 Likes

Thanks, @WJ_PhD !

Essentially, you should not count on being able to take it and get anti-aging effects, it’s a giant gamble.

They suggest that unless you have an SGLT2i prescribed for some indication, taking it off label is an unquantified risk.

Bottom line, as so often, everyone must do a risk/reward analysis for their own medical situation.

I have elected to take empagliflozin 25mg/day despite having no condition for which this med is officially indicated - though I am prediabetic and even though my PCP would not prescribe it for me unless I become officially diabetic, I think in my case it’s reasonable. But even if I was not prediabetic, I would still take it. I base that on research suggesting that renal protection effects in non-impaired kidneys (healthy) are still present - I am 68, and kidney function declines with age. Getting rid of glucose I see as a win regardless, and research suggests that it may slow the progression to diabetes. That is all I am hoping for, if there is more, that’s icing on the cake. Then I have to ask what are the possible downsides or risk for these speculative benefits. Well, it seems relatively safe for a male with no history of urogenital infections. YMMV, and everyone will make their own decision, but those are my considerations.

2 Likes

thanks @WJ_PhD and @CronosTempi . Yeah, I’ve been taking it for more than a year now at 12.5mg daily, but I tend to like it as I haven’t been able to notice any side effects not even any muscle aches nor any effect on exercise (which metformin seems to have).

So, my dilemma was more to do with the dosing as I’m tempted to go to 25mg Empagliflozin and maybe scrap metformin (currently do 1000mg daily). I actually like metformin also especially when I take in the evening either with my dinner or before bed, but everyone is saying it effects exercise (not able to confirm nor deny as I do very light exercises and wouldn’t be able to tell either way).

@CronosTempi, do you think you experienced any side effects at that dose, which seems to be the maximum recommended for Diabetes, i.e. did it affect your exercise, or any aches etc…

No side effects whatsoever that I could tell.

1 Like