"Activity Snacks" for Metabolic Control: 15 Squats Outperform Walking in Interrupting Sedentary Time

If you work at a desk with a computer, keep this in mind! This a 2021 study, so you may have heard this already, but I needed the reminder so I thought others here might also:

A new study from the University of Toronto provides a compelling, zero-cost intervention for the sedentary longevity enthusiast: “activity snacks.” In a randomized crossover trial involving 14 healthy adults, researchers demonstrated that performing just 15 chair squats (with calf raises) every 30 minutes significantly improved postprandial insulin handling, outperforming even moderate walking breaks in duration of effect.

The Study Summary

Sedentary behavior is an independent mortality risk factor, distinct from a lack of exercise. To test practical interruptions, researchers subjected 14 participants (7 males, 7 females; age 24 ± 5) to three 7.5-hour experimental conditions:

  1. SIT: Uninterrupted sitting.
  2. WALK: 2 minutes of walking (3.1 mph) every 30 minutes.
  3. SQUAT: 15 chair stands with calf raises (taking ~1 minute) every 30 minutes.

While glucose levels remained similar across groups, insulin dynamics shifted dramatically. Following a mixed-macronutrient lunch, the SQUAT protocol reduced the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for insulin by **37%**compared to sitting, whereas walking reduced it by 29%. Crucially, the SQUAT protocol sustained this reduction over a 3-hour period (24% reduction vs. SIT), while the walking group’s benefit lost statistical significance over the longer window.

Mechanistic Analysis for the Biohacker

  • The “Silent” Mechanism: Surprisingly, muscle biopsies revealed no significant changes in the phosphorylation of key insulin signaling proteins (AKTThr308, AKTSer473, AS160Ser318). This suggests the glycemic benefit is not driven by upregulating the classic insulin signaling cascade (sensitizing the pathway). Instead, the benefit is likely driven by contraction-mediated glucose uptake (non-insulin dependent GLUT4 translocation) or hemodynamic changes increasing muscle perfusion.
  • Metabolic Flexibility: The reduced insulin-to-glucose ratio in the SQUAT group indicates the pancreas required significantly less insulin to manage the same glucose load. Preserving pancreatic beta-cell function and maintaining low circulating insulin is a cornerstone of longevity strategies (antagonistic to pro-aging mTOR hyperactivation).
  • Hemodynamic Shear: The inclusion of the “calf raise” in the squat protocol likely enhanced the “muscle pump” effect, aiding venous return and potentially increasing shear stress on endothelial cells, a stimulus for nitric oxide production and vascular health.

Actionable Insights for N=1 Experimentation

  • The “30-30-15” Protocol: Set a repeating timer for 30 minutes during sedentary work. Perform 15 bodyweight squats with a calf raise at the top of each movement.
    • Feasibility: Highly feasible. Requires no equipment and less than 60 seconds.
  • Stacking Hypothesis: Combine this with a standing desk. While the study tested sitting interruptions, performing the squats while using a standing desk could theoretically amplify the non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT).
  • Biomarker Tracking:
    • CGM (Continuous Glucose Monitor): Monitor post-prandial spikes. The goal is a flatter curve with less “area under the curve.”
    • Fasting Insulin: Over a month of this protocol, test if fasting insulin trends downward, indicating reduced basal resistance.
  • Dosing: The study suggests frequency beats duration. 1 minute every 30 minutes appears superior to longer bouts less frequently.
  • Limitations for Implementation: This specific protocol used healthy young adults. Older individuals with sarcopenia may see greater relative benefit due to the resistance component, or less if anabolic resistance is high.

Source Research Paper (open access): Interrupting prolonged sitting with repeated chair stands or short walks reduces postprandial insulinemia in healthy adults

1 Like

I do this. I squat throughout the day. However, there are some other limitations. For older people (late 60’s onward), you may not be able to sustain such a volume of squats if you also do weighted squats as exercise (f.ex. I do 32 minutes twice a week - so 64 minutes - of very strenuous weighted squats including jumping squats). The volume becomes an issue with recovery and potential of overuse injuries.

Furthermore, and perhaps even more importantly, your base conditioning level matters. For someone like myself, who squats a lot, my squat endurance and efficiency is very high. A mere 15 air squats (bodyweight) even full ATG (“ass to grass”) translates to near zero effort. I don’t believe my body would even register it and translate into any kind of metabolic effect. So I do 2 minutes of jumping squats but without the weightvest - that definitely registers! And for my regular exercise jumping squats with a 45lbs weightvest for 5 minutes non-stop are extremely challenging. Anyhow, my point here is that you need to take into account your base conditioning and adjust accordingly.

1 Like