Would You Trade Your Testicles for 20 Extra Years of Life?

For the average longevity enthusiast, the “price” of a longer life is usually measured in bitter pills, rigorous fasting, or high-intensity interval training. But historical data suggests a much steeper—and more literal—cut might be the most effective life-extension protocol ever discovered.

While the modern biohacking community obsessively tracks biomarkers and titration schedules for Rapamycin, a 2012 study published in Current Biology highlights a demographic that achieved the “Holy Grail” of aging science long before the first calorie-restriction study: the eunuchs of Korea’s Chosun Dynasty.

The findings are as staggering as they are emasculating.


The Chosun Longevity Secret

Researchers Kyung-Jin Min and Cheol-Koo Lee meticulously analyzed the Yang-Se-Gye-Bo, a genealogical record of Korean eunuchs who served the imperial court from the 14th to the early 20th century. Because eunuchs were allowed to marry and adopt castrated boys to maintain their lineage, their life histories were preserved with unusual clarity.

The team compared the lifespans of 81 eunuchs against non-castrated men of similar social standing (Yang-ban or nobles) from the same era.

The results were definitive:

  • The Survival Gap: The average lifespan of a eunuch was 70 years (± 1.76).
  • The Control Group: The noblemen, who enjoyed the best food and highest security of the time, lived only 51 to 56 years.
  • The Centenarian Rate: Out of the 81 eunuchs, three were centenarians (100, 101, and 109 years old).

To put that in perspective, the incidence of centenarians among these eunuchs was 130 times higher than in modern developed countries. Even the kings of the Chosun Dynasty—the most pampered men in the kingdom—averaged only 47 years of life.

1 Like

The human data is weak and generally in mice trials castrated mice only live as long as mice who exercise. The ITP trials indicate that male mice on some form of non-feminizing estrodiol live longer than castrated male mice and there is good reason to believe that even just using 5ar inhibitors (without inhibiting testosterone) provides some of that benefit already.
Unless you are MtF transgender, there is NO good reason to touch your testes. Not only will it massively reduce your QoL but chances are that frailty will eat up all the marginal potential lifespan increases. Even considering that idea is already mental illness.

2 Likes

I think that as the number of transgender women grows in the future, we might finally have some statistical studies. If it turns out to be true, would you be willing to undergo castration? I definitely wouldn’t!

2 Likes

No, I’ll leave that experiment to BJ. I like my balls and want to keep them.

1 Like

Discussed earlier here: Castration: Simple "One off" Procedure, 20% Longer Life — If You’re Willing to Go All In…?

1 Like

Maybe (big maybe), I would trade my testicles when I’m 115 years old for an extra 20 years of life LOL

1 Like

Top content.

How about one nut for 10 years… deal? :stuck_out_tongue::wink:

2 Likes

Imagine how much it would suck to castrate yourself thinking you’ll live longer and then end up dying of something else instead

4 Likes

First it says non-castrated men of equal social standing, later it says they were noblemen who ate the best food. Sweets kill. Sometimes being pampered shortens life. Did they have an equal diet?

2 Likes

No
10 characters