I feel sickly for like three days and then it’s like nothing ever happened. Since I don’t take rapamycin all that often anymore it’s not really an issue.
It is possible, but I’m struggling to think of how I might structure the poll. We have some people taking rapamycin (1mg daily) and some like @John_Hemming taking very large doses once every month or two (and probably people dosing many different levels between these two extremes). The question is how do we structure a poll that can cover this large a range of possible options - I’m open to your ideas…
and unfortunately the integrated polling in this software doesn’t allow branching / conditional questions (e.g. if you have stopped taking rapamycin, why have you stopped"…)
I tend to agree that structuring a poll would be difficult. I have just implanted a CGM to monitor my next dose which i expect to take when i get my baseline blood test results. The draw was on Tuesday. I dont think that fits a simple poll. Depending on the results i may decide to delay the dose.
i struggled with that, my solution was to ask you!
the best i came up with was to create a 2dimensional grid with period on one axis and dosage on the other (adjusted by a multiplier of 3x if taken with gfj). The grid would be algebraically coded A to whatever and the poll would be to choose your letter.
I have no idea what level of rapamycin ng/ml is good for me or anyone for that matter as that’s only one data point. So I follow my blood markers instead. Am I immune suppressed? I check my The ratio of neutrophils to lymphocyte which ideally in the range of 0.78 to 3.5 per literatures. Anyone has a critic to this approach?
For years, my WBC hardly changed. Can you elaborate why watch WBCs is preferred over watch neutrophils and lymphocyte? I do know watching HGB is also important. In clinical setting, doctors tend to watch WBC and Neutrophils (the ability to fight) for infection, HGB for something more sinister.
Monitoring neutrophils (I would say absolute neutrophil count rather than the ratio to WBC) makes more sense. Neutropenia is an established side-effect of rapa and may be responsible for the apthous ulcers.
Because neutrophils have a shorter half life the shift is more visible than lymphocytes. You can see this in my second high dose topic. However, both change. Ideally measure both (and they are most of WBC).
We don’t know the averages, and that’s one main reason I have been encouraging people to take blood tests and post their results so we can collect that data. I know that 6 mg resulted in a level of around 2 ng/mL at 48 hours in a few adults anecdotally, but whether that’s typical or they are outliers is hard to say. Optimally we would have average of lots of people.