The problem isn’t eGFR per se. The problem is the inaccurate eGFR on the lab report, which is just inversely correlated with serum creatinine.
I had to explain all this to my primary care physician when I bulked up significantly, because she was convinced I was on the verge of kidney failure, and I was like “I did some reading. Please order cystatin C.” Then you can calculate your eGFR yourself using both datapoints. My cystatin-C only eGFR is nearly 2x my creatinine-only eGFR.
eGFR: 94 as of August 2024
age 70
Male
I haven’t started rapamycin yet but would like to soon. I was using compounded rapamycin and had several blood tests, each of which showed rapamycin below measurable levels, so I consider that as “haven’t started yet”. The multiple blood tests were of variations such as putting the compounded rapamycin capsule in other types of capsules including those advertised as acid-resistant, mixing rapamycin with a penetration enhancer and applying to skin, and dissolving under tongue.
My eGFR was not previously that high. I wonder if it’s higher this year because I started taking enzymes or apple cider vinegar.
Diet: no beef or pork. I probably don’t get enough protein.
Double check this but I think blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on your blood panel is a rough marker of protein intake. I eat nearly vegan diet, a little fish, and am also 70, but I don’t seem to have evidence of muscle loss. Probably because I exercise daily. BUN runs a bit low consistent with my diet which is clearly not high protein.
I may be wrong, but from my novice understanding, and as someone with light CKD myself (IGA nephropathy), proteinuria is a more important factor in kidney decline than serum creatinine. My serum creatinine is transient and can get to negative numbers like over 1.3 (it can get much lower though, too). I think rapa might even play a role in serum creatinine temporary elevation, dont quote me there. But my proteinuria is very low, and there registers no protein or blood in urine on the general tests.