The idea is to dose like normal, followed by another smaller dose maybe 8 hours later. It seems to me that the idea is to get a greater area under the curve, and this would accomplish that. You would still be in about the same place at the end of 2 weeks, which is the crucial part as near as I can tell.
Interesting idea that might increase the AUC, but why would it necessarily do so? Also, peak levels might be important for penetration into some tissues, especially the blood-brain barrier.
Anything other than this is just speculation without much data behind it… it could work better, or not. I’m not even sure how we’d test to know if its better. yes - you are right, it will increase the AUC. But so would just higher single doses.
It just looked to me like the high doses cause a very steep curve down and it is eliminated, which seems wasteful to me. I thought a longer lower curve would give it time to be absorbed into more tissue?
Pure speculation, I just though maybe somebody would have an insight that I had not heard of , thanks.
That is true; for the first few hours after dosing its an exponential curve downward, then it flattens pretty quickly out to a more linear curve. I’m just not sure how much additional value you get out of two sharp spikes over one… and sadly, very hard (if not impossible) to measure the benefit such as things are right now WRT measuring autophagy or mTOR inhibition, etc.