Likely because of my age but I can think of a lifetime of examples: evolution, nuclear weapons testing, STEM cell research, nuclear energy, SETI (in cold war period), women’s movement protesting research on sex differences, climate change. Some, more explicitly political than others but all having ideological perspectives having some basis in politics.
3 Likes
True, but those issues don’t seem to come up much here in our forums these days. 99% of it (from my rough estimation) seems to be related to Covid Vaccines. So I think the policy of avoiding covid vaccination discussions (backwards looking), it will keep the political disagreements / arguments to a minimum.
And my focus in this statement is really the retrospective takes on Covid vaccines that are decidedly one-sided; e.g. this type of discussion rehashing old data that seems more political than scientific: CANARY In A COVID World
I’m not talking about new data from new research studies; for example I think the type of new information presented in this type of discussion is less political and more pure science oriented: Vaccines for longevity
I’m trying to parse the more scientific, less political aspects of covid vaccination from the more political. The goal here is to keep the forum focused on good science, around strategies and tactics for healthy longevity.
5 Likes
I agree and also to your point, the breadth and depth to which the politics have penetrated professions more-or-less based on science. As one example, I see a disturbing number of vaccine-related anti-government and anti-science comments made by physicians and nurses on medical sites.
I wish this were true, but I don’t think it’s the case. As we know, a lie travels around the earth before the truth even has its shoes on. In human psychology, there is a huge bias towards us believing the first thing we hear and we weight that more heavily, even in the face of better evidence.
The other problem is that online, it’s incredibly easy for a small number of people to totally derail a conversation or post lots of bullshit. So again, I think the intent, effort and credibility is what matters. If somebody wants to come here and say vaccines are bad and they actually have new evidence, that’s fine. But if they’re going to come out with the same ‘evidence’ that’s been debunked 20x already, they’re only adding noise.
Lastly, there’s also cognitive dissonance. There’s already been negative studies of Rapamycin, but we find reasons - the dose wasn’t right, daily administration isn’t any good, the formulation didn’t allow proper absorption etc etc. But, for example, if Matt K’s dog study fails to show an effect, do you think everybody here will quit Rapamycin? I bet they won’t, because it’s also partly ideological, just like how some people cling to keto, or carnivore, or metformin, or resveratol and it becomes part of their identity and value system. It’s very hard to let go of something you already believe, no matter how many good ideas you later encounter.
6 Likes
It’s a good heuristic to recognize you’re sometimes or many times dealing with high, drunk, or people who have e.g diagnosed or undiagnosed schizophrenia. Just read twitter, reddit, or youtube comments. Some of these drugs can have lethal withdrawals so I hope those on them taper off slowly if they choose to do so.
1 Like
Maybe I missed it, but I’ve never read an offensive comment posted by @Bicep. Anyone calling for his ouster should be sent to the gulag.
4 Likes
Bicep is not being considered for a ban.
Even if someone has a different opinion than yours, they are free to express it (within reason). Relax everyone. 
5 Likes
I would be opposed to Bicep being banned just based on his reports from the farm alone. Everytime I see one of his posts, I read it eagerly in case there are more farm updates. I don’t have a big bucket list, and climbing Mt. Everest is not on it, but I do have a faint hope that one day, perhaps when I’m 90, I can tour Bicep’s farm.
6 Likes
Whereas I understand your point, I have to disagree again with you.
People on this forum may make arguments in favor of Rapamycin that you think are erroneous, but others will agree with you and everyone will have the freedom to decide what’s right.
The biggest problem with the COVID/vaccine issue was the lack of honest discussion of the many aspects of the issue. Things would have turned out much better in the long run if initial freedom of speech had been allowed.
4 Likes
a lie travels around the earth before the truth even has its shoes on
I’ve also heard that the truth is like a lion, Turn it loose and you don’t have to defend it, it’ll defend itself. I would say this isn’t true in the short run, but over time we should get there.
In human psychology, there is a huge bias towards us believing the first thing we hear and we weight that more heavily, even in the face of better evidence.
The other problem is that online, it’s incredibly easy for a small number of people to totally derail a conversation or post lots of bullshit.
many times dealing with high, drunk, or people who have e.g diagnosed or undiagnosed schizophrenia
You guys’ thesis is that anybody that questions that vaccines have saved us from misery and death is stupid, on drugs or crazy. I don’t think you have done all the reading necessary to make that conclusion. “Turtles all the way down” by Mary Holland and Zoey O’Toole explains that vaccines are tested against a placebo that may contain the thing causing the side effects. It’s not a real placebo.
Also a virus continues to evolve until it causes less and less damage to the host. These childhood diseases were virtually gone when the vaccine came out. There is much question about what would have happened without them. These things are detailed in this book and a few others. I don’t really know who they wrote the books for if people are all stupid and high.
I actually hope you’re right about vaccines and RFK proves it. Otherwise this was a pretty stupid chapter in our history. But I do want to know.
people cling to keto, or carnivore, or metformin, or resveratol and it becomes part of their identity and value system
I’ve tried all these things and I think keto is important to teach your body to be flexible and burn fat more. I use it off and on. It seems to help.
I saw an interview with Sam Bankman-Fried in prison where he was asked if he’s learned anything in prison. He said he was shocked to learn that the violent criminals he’s in jail with are great at chess. He thought they all were stupid.
My advice, which obviously you can take or leave, is to watch any vaccine trials underway and make sure they are done right. To prove your point. Don’t take anybody’s word for it. Also read what the stupid and high people have written. Vax-Unvax Let the science speak, by RFK. I know he has a brain worm and is on heroin, so find his mistakes and save us all a lot of trouble.
2 Likes
That is mostly the case but not necessarily true for all pathogens. If a virus has a long enough incubation time it can even evolve to become deadlier.
4 Likes
Is this measles cases as of March 6 for each of the prior years or should we be multiplying 2025 by 6 to get the correct number? Either way, what the hell was going on under Bush senior?
Googled it:
Large outbreak in New York and Philly. CDC (1998): Measles Outbreak -- New York City, 1990-1991
Unvaccinated kids! (story from 2019): How A Measles Outbreak Was Halted In The 1990s : Shots - Health News : NPR
It was the biggest year since the early 1970s.
3 Likes
Excellent depiction of the life health and saving power of a vaccine @LukeMV. Thanks for posting it. The small blips in 2025 are erupting in areas for which vaccination rates are so low that there is no effective herd much less individual immunity. The 2025 data also demonstrate the efficiency of the vaccine but you have to index the rate on the vaccination database.
1 Like