Healome | AI Health Coach to Track and Slow Biological Age (new clock system)

#1

I make no comment as to whether this particular clock system is any good, but I uploaded my last set of biomarkers. Sadly it cannot calculate BUN from the UK biomarkers.

20250330 open age.pdf (315.0 KB)

Next page won’t print properly. Here is the scrape:

Your blood test results indicate that your biological age is 46.3 years, which is significantly younger than your chronological age of 66 years, with a delta of -19.7 years. This is a positive indicator suggesting that your overall health markers are better than what is typical for your chronological age. Let’s go through your results:

  1. Platelet Count (130 10⁹/L): This is slightly below the normal range, which typically starts around 150 10⁹/L. A lower platelet count can sometimes be a concern because platelets are crucial for blood clotting. It may be worth discussing this with a healthcare provider to rule out any underlying issues.

  2. Mean Cell Volume (95.1 fl): This is within a typical range, indicating that the size of your red blood cells is normal.

  3. Lymphocyte Count (0.72 10⁹/L): This is on the lower end of the normal range. Lymphocytes are important for your immune system, so maintaining a balanced diet and regular exercise can help support your immune health.

  4. Monocytes (0.28 10⁹/L): This is within the normal range, indicating a normal level of these white blood cells, which are part of your body’s defense against infections.

  5. RBC Count (4.26 10¹²/L): This is in the normal range, suggesting that your body is producing a healthy number of red blood cells.

  6. Potassium (4.61 mmol/l): This is a normal value, essential for nerve and muscle function.

  7. Creatinine (82.2 µmol/l): This is a normal level, indicating good kidney function.

  8. Alanine Aminotransferase (13.1 U/l): This is a normal value, suggesting healthy liver function.

  9. Alkaline Phosphatase (47 U/l): This is slightly on the lower end of the normal range, but not necessarily concerning on its own.

  10. Glycohemoglobin (32.68 mmol/mol): This corresponds to a normal HbA1c level, indicating good long-term blood glucose control.

  11. Glucose (5.1 mmol/l): This is a normal fasting blood sugar level.

Overall, your results are quite good, especially given the significantly younger biological age. The key point to monitor would be the lower platelet count, and it might be worthwhile to discuss this with a healthcare professional. As always, keep in mind that this information is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Keep up with a healthy lifestyle, and you are on a great path!

I took a large dose of rapamycin on 20th March which will be affecting HbA1c, Glucose, WBC, Lipids, RBC, Platelets still on Monday 30th March (the date of the blood test.)

I like the fact that it has a go at age without being told your age, but I am not sure they have sufficient data to get this right.

#2

I went in again and it gave a different age for the same biomarkers. That implies it is training on data that goes in. I have no issue with that, but it means that it is not that reliable.

#3

If there is little variation between readings, consider calculating the mean across multiple trials to ensure a stable outcome.

#4

These biological age metrics, including epigenetic clocks and telomere measurements, are often designed to cater to the desire to stay young. Their reliability, however, is significantly lower than that of basic models built on chronological age, gender, and lifestyle habits—a point I previously analyzed in another thread regarding epigenetic clocks.

1 Like
#5

I am interested in basic biomarkers. They have their stories to tell and those stories can be quite complex.