Amount of Central Fat Predicts Mortality Risk in Non-Obese Individuals

Have you managed to lose your percent fat? I’ve gained about 7 kg the past few years, most of it fat it seems, but still actually optimal BMI. I tried tracking food in an excel spreadsheet (kcal/protein) for awhile and it seems to work.

What I’m noticing is that to get enough protein according to the protein bros basically the only thing you can eat is lean protein, vegetables, maybe 50-100 grams of whole grains or slightly more, one or two fruits, and very slight amount of fat.

3 Likes

I’m going in for a Dexa scan soon so I’ll get back to you on that, but I think it’s working. I’m taking an approach very similar to yours… but avoiding most wheat products. s

4 Likes

Anybody figure out how to buy this yet?

1 Like

Cellulose acetate should be dirt cheap due to all the industrial uses for it.

https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Cellulose-Acetate-Cas-9004-35-7_1601228304406.html

Acetogenic fibers - 6:00

Acetogenic: can be fermented by gut bacteria into acetate - 6:21

Inulin -Chickory root, Jerusalem artichokes, onions, garlic, leeks, asparagus -6:26

8:19 Metformin has consistently been shown in animal studies to increase Akkermansia muciniphilia.

8:43 Rhubarb extract has shown some promise in pre-clinical studies for increasing Akkermansia muciniphilia levels.

3 Likes

Kill the visceral fat before it kills you! Get your DEXA scan now to check your visceral fat levels!

Hidden organ fat speeds up heart aging, while fat around the hips and thighs in women may slow it.

Large amounts of visceral fat, the hidden fat that collects around internal organs, have been linked to a quicker aging process in the heart, according to new research.

While aging is the primary risk factor for heart disease, scientists still do not fully understand why some individuals experience faster cardiovascular aging than others. The team behind this study suggests that visceral fat may be a key contributor, speeding up the aging of both the heart and blood vessels. Although this type of fat has long been associated with negative health effects, the findings provide fresh evidence that it may specifically drive premature heart aging.

Published in the European Heart Journal, the study examined data from 21,241 UK Biobank participants. This resource includes whole-body imaging, allowing scientists to measure not only the total amount of fat but also its distribution across different parts of the body.

Measuring Heart Age with AI

The UK Biobank data also includes detailed imaging of the heart and blood vessels. Artificial intelligence was used to analyze these images to capture signs of organ aging – such as tissues becoming stiff and inflamed. An individual was given a “heart age” which can be compared to their actual age at the time of the scan.

The researchers found that faster heart aging was linked to having more visceral adipose tissue. Visceral adipose tissue is fat found deep inside the abdomen around organs such as the stomach, intestines, and liver. This type of fat cannot be seen from the outside, and some people can have large amounts of visceral fat despite having a healthy weight.

The researchers found signs on blood tests that visceral fat is linked to increased inflammation in the body – which is a potential cause of premature aging.

Open Access Paper:

Sex-specific body fat distribution predicts cardiovascular ageing

https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf553/8237967#google_vignette

5 Likes

image
https://x.com/real_lord_miles/status/1962885255251055096#m

Blood test recently:

image

image

https://x.com/real_lord_miles/status/1962246098187428102#m

2 Likes

This will be interesting to pay attention to. I certainly would never do this but I’m always up for observing a unique experiment.

Reminded me of this guy.


6 Likes

Angus Barbieri lived to be only 51 years old.

He lost a lot of weight fast, but it didn’t help him live into old age. He died younger than many obese people who remain obese. I guess this is an example of fasting that didn’t pan out for longevity.

Tragically, he died at the young age of 51 in September 1990 after a short illness.
His father, Joe, briefly outlived his beloved son and died at the age of 94. It was a tragic footnote to an incredible story of human endurance.

6 Likes

I recently watched the True North guy on the Diary of a CEO podcast. This was not his most interesting interview I’ve seen, but this was by far the most recent.

When I say not interesting, I only mean they didn’t talk about the wild cases of someone being in chronic pain etc and giving up hope and how the long fast magically cures them.

They max out their water fasts at 40 days, and when going that long, it’s important to do it under a doctor’s supervision. He also notes it’s important not exercise during a long fast.

I would imagine the illness was not related to the weight loss. He became ill after he broke the fast and started eating again, so that tells me they are both separate things.

51 is awfully young to die. It doesn’t appear that the fasting helped him live longer.

1 Like

Yes but what I’m saying is that he probably would have still gotten the illness if he remained obese, so we will never find out if it was going to help him live longer since the illness stopped him in his tracks.

1 Like
1 Like

The talk focuses on the Optimized Mediterranean diet, for visceral fat reduction.

Ai summary

Here’s a comprehensive, evidence-based explanation of how to optimize the Mediterranean diet specifically for visceral fat reduction, incorporating the latest nutritional science, clinical trials, and practical design principles.


:microscope: 1. Mechanistic Basis: Why the Mediterranean Diet Targets Visceral Fat

Visceral fat (fat around internal organs) is strongly linked to insulin resistance, inflammation, and aging. The Mediterranean diet (MD) reduces it through several mechanisms:

Mechanism Supporting Evidence Explanation
Improved insulin sensitivity Trials like PREDIMED show enhanced glycemic control independent of calories Monounsaturated fats (olive oil) and low-glycemic foods reduce post-meal glucose excursions
Reduced systemic inflammation ↓ CRP, IL-6, TNF-α in multiple meta-analyses Polyphenols from olive oil, vegetables, and red wine inhibit NF-κB activation
Altered adipokine signaling ↑ adiponectin, ↓ leptin Improves lipid metabolism and fatty acid oxidation
Enhanced gut microbiota diversity ↑ Akkermansia, Bacteroidetes ratios Improves gut permeability and endotoxin-driven inflammation
Lower hepatic fat and ectopic lipid accumulation MRI-based trials show reduction in liver fat independent of weight loss Reduces insulin resistance and de-novo lipogenesis

:green_salad: 2. Macronutrient Optimization for Visceral Fat Reduction

Target Ratios

  • Carbohydrates: 35–40% of calories (low-GI, high-fiber sources)
  • Protein: 20–25% (mostly fish, legumes, dairy)
  • Fat: 35–45% (primarily monounsaturated + omega-3)

These are modestly lower in carbs and higher in protein/fat than the classic Mediterranean diet, to enhance fat oxidation and reduce insulin levels.

Carbohydrates

  • Preferred: lentils, chickpeas, oats, quinoa, vegetables, low-GI fruits (berries, apples)
  • Limit: white bread, pasta, potatoes, sugar, fruit juices
  • Fiber goal: 30–40 g/day (↑ GLP-1 and gut motility)

Protein

  • Fish (3–5x/week): sardines, salmon, mackerel → EPA/DHA improve adipocyte metabolism
  • Legumes (3–4x/week) and Greek yogurt provide slow-digesting proteins
  • Occasional pasture eggs and poultry

Fat

  • Extra virgin olive oil: cornerstone (≥3 tbsp/day)
  • Nuts and seeds: almonds, walnuts, chia, flax
  • Limit: animal saturated fats and refined oils

:herb: 3. Key Functional Foods with Strong Evidence for Visceral Fat Loss

Food / Compound Active Components Clinical Impact
Olive oil (polyphenols, oleic acid) Oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol Reduces visceral fat & improves lipid profile (PREDIMED 2013, 2022 follow-ups)
Fatty fish (omega-3) EPA/DHA Promotes lipolysis, reduces hepatic fat
Leafy greens & crucifers Nitrates, sulforaphane Improves insulin signaling and liver detoxification
Fermented dairy (Greek yogurt, kefir) Probiotics, CLA Modulates gut flora and inflammation
Legumes Resistant starch Improves satiety and reduces abdominal obesity
Berries, citrus, pomegranate Polyphenols, anthocyanins Inhibit fat storage enzymes and oxidative stress
Green tea, coffee Catechins, chlorogenic acid Enhance thermogenesis and fat oxidation
Vinegar and lemon water Acetic acid, citric acid Lower postprandial glucose and insulin

:stopwatch: 4. Meal Timing and Patterning

Chrononutrition matters:

  • Front-load calories (larger breakfast/lunch, smaller dinner) → improved glucose tolerance.
  • Avoid snacking—promotes fasting-induced autophagy.
  • 12–14 h overnight fast (time-restricted eating) enhances visceral fat loss by improving circadian alignment.

:wine_glass: 5. Caloric and Lifestyle Modifiers

  • Caloric balance: Modest 10–20% deficit yields visceral fat loss without muscle loss.
  • Physical activity synergy:
    • Aerobic + resistance training doubles visceral fat loss vs. diet alone.
    • HIIT and fasted walking are particularly effective with MD.
  • Sleep and stress management: Short sleep (<6 h) and cortisol spikes blunt visceral fat reduction.

:bar_chart: 6. Example Daily Plan (≈1800 kcal for a 70 kg person)

Meal Example Foods Key Rationale
Breakfast Greek yogurt + mixed berries + chia + drizzle of olive oil Polyphenols, fiber, slow carbs
Lunch Grilled salmon, quinoa-lentil salad with olive oil dressing High protein, omega-3s, low-GI carbs
Snack (optional) Green tea + 10 almonds Catechins + MUFAs
Dinner Vegetable stew (tomato, eggplant, zucchini, beans) + small portion of feta Plant antioxidants, low calorie density
Evening Herbal tea or kefir Gut health, no late insulin spike

:chart_with_upwards_trend: 7. Clinical Evidence Summary

  • PREDIMED Study (NEJM, 2013; follow-ups 2022): MD with extra virgin olive oil or nuts ↓ central obesity and metabolic syndrome risk.
  • Di Daniele et al., Nutrients 2020: Modified MD (lower carb, higher protein) produced greater visceral fat reduction than standard MD over 12 weeks.
  • Shai et al., NEJM 2008 (DIRECT trial): MD outperformed low-fat diet for visceral and hepatic fat reduction on MRI.
  • Meta-analysis (Eur J Clin Nutr 2022): Average 1.5–2.5 kg greater loss of visceral fat vs. control diets after 6 months.

:brain: 8. Optimization Summary

Lever Optimal Strategy Expected Impact
Macronutrients 35–40% carbs, 20–25% protein, 35–45% fat Balanced insulin + satiety
Olive oil dosage ≥3 tbsp/day Anti-inflammatory, pro-lipolytic
Fish intake 3–5x/week Improves hepatic and visceral fat
Fasting window 12–14 h daily Enhances fat oxidation
Exercise synergy Add HIIT 2–3x/week + resistance training Accelerates visceral fat loss
Stress/sleep Meditate, avoid late meals, 7–9 h sleep Reduces cortisol-driven fat gain

Would you like me to generate a 7-day optimized Mediterranean meal plan (with calorie/macronutrient targets) specifically designed for visceral fat reduction and longevity biomarkers (e.g., insulin, CRP, TG/HDL, liver enzymes)?

2 Likes

https://gizmodo.com/skinny-is-the-new-fat-plenty-of-people-have-normal-bmi-but-hidden-obesity-study-finds-2000677510

3 Likes

Simple At-Home Test to Measure Your Visceral Fat (Zero Cost!)

formulas used: Women: 2.15 × Waist C − 3.63 × Proximal Thigh C + 1.46 × Age + 6.22 × BMI − 92.713 Men: 6 × Waist C − 4.41 × proximal thigh C + 1.19 × Age − 213.65

lb to kg converter: https://www.unitconverters.net/weight…

inch to cm converter: https://www.unitconverters.net/length… ft to meters converter: https://www.unitconverters.net/length…

Visceral fat index beats waist circumference alone (and is at least as good as DXA): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/f…

Visceral fat index associates with cancer deaths, cardiovascular deaths and all-cause deaths better than BMI or waist circumference alone: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles…

Visceral fat index associates with fasting glucose, HbA1c, inflammatory markers, ApoB, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, Metabolic Syndrome better than BMI or waist circumference alone: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles…

Visceral fat index associates with hypertension, prediabetes/diabetes: https://www.nature.com/articles/s4159… 2021

Note: Some viewers are reporting getting weird results from the calculator. We tested it multiple times both choosing “man” and “woman” and it seemed to work correctly. This doesn´t rule out a problem, of course, but make sure you´re entering the units correctly. If you enter waist circumference in inches or weight in lbs or height in feet the result won´t make any sense. The site is European so it´s all in metric units.

2 Likes

This video and paper make me wonder if we could use fasting combined with higher doses of rapamycin to accelerate our visceral fat reductions we are targeting… What are your thoughts?

This Odd Fasting Method Shreds Visceral Fat More than Healthy Diets!

AI SUMMARY

Understanding Visceral Fat

  • Visceral fat is a type of fat that accumulates around vital organs such as the kidneys, liver, and heart.
  • This type of fat is associated with several health risks, including type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.
  • Research has shown that higher levels of visceral fat increase the risk of these diseases, making its reduction important for overall health.
  • The discussion acknowledges that visceral fat’s harmful effects on health are extensive and will be explored in future content.

Fasting Protocols in Research

  • Researchers aimed to investigate the effects of an unconventional fasting method on visceral fat reduction.
  • Participants were randomly assigned to either a fasting protocol or a healthy nutrition plan, with details on both protocols to be explained later.
  • The fasting protocol involved a 36-hour fast, which included a unique aspect known as a protein pacing period.

Details of the Fasting Protocol

  • During the 36-hour fasting period, participants consumed a single 400-calorie snack rich in antioxidants and adaptogens.
  • The protein pacing period involved consuming four to five meals daily that were evenly spaced and included protein in each meal.
  • The meal structure included a protein shake with fruit and vegetables for breakfast, a protein shake for lunch, a 200-calorie snack for men, a whole food dinner, and an evening protein snack.
  • On non-fasting days, women consumed around 1,350 calories and men around 1,700 calories, with a macronutrient breakdown of 35% protein, 35% carbohydrates, and 30% dietary fat.
  • In contrast, the heart-healthy comparison diet provided 1,200 calories for women and 1,500 for men, with a higher carbohydrate content and limited sugar and fat intake.

Study Outcomes and Observations

  • The study tracked changes in visceral fat from the beginning to the end over a period of nine weeks.
  • The caloric-restricted heart-healthy group experienced some visceral fat loss, but the intermittent fasting group achieved double the fat loss on an absolute basis.
  • Despite the significant differences in fat loss, researchers sought to determine whether these results could be attributed solely to the fasting protocol.
  • Analysis of energy intake and physical activity showed no significant differences between the two groups, suggesting other factors may be at play.

Potential Explanations for Results

  • Even though the fasting group consumed slightly more dietary fiber, they also consumed more protein, which could influence results.
  • Insulin levels were comparable between the two groups, with the fasting group showing slightly higher levels at the end of the study.
  • A potential unexplored factor could be an increase in metabolism, although this was not measured in the study.
  • Critiques of the study include its short duration and small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study concluded that the 36-hour quasi fast, combined with a protein pacing period, significantly outperformed a heart-healthy caloric-restricted diet in reducing visceral fat.
  • The results suggest that individuals seeking to reduce visceral fat effectively may benefit from this unique fasting approach.
  • Further exploration of other strategies for managing visceral fat will be provided in future discussions.

The Study (open access):

Reference
[Study 534] Naveen Kumar GV, Wang R-S, Sharma AX, et al.
Non-canonical lysosomal lipolysis drives mobilization of adipose tissue energy stores with fasting.
Nat Commun. 2025;16:1330. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56613-3

During fasting fat loss starts with lypolisis but over time autophagy becomes a larger player in the process:

AI Summaries and information from the paper:

Here is a refined summary of the diet protocols from the study Intermittent fasting and protein pacing are superior to caloric restriction for weight and visceral fat loss (Obesity (Silver Spring) 2023; 31(Suppl 1):139-149. doi:10.1002/oby.23660) — with direct links to the sources embedded.

IF-P (Intermittent Fasting + Protein Pacing) Arm

Overall structure (8 weeks):
• The intervention period was eight weeks (after a short run-in). 
• Participants: n = 21 in IF-P vs n = 20 in the CR group. 

Protein-pacing (non-fasting) days (5–6 days/week):
• Women: 4 meals/day; Men: 5 meals/day. 
• Two meals were liquid meal-replacement shakes (~350 kcal for women/ ~400 kcal for men), each providing ~30 g (women) / ~36 g (men) protein and ~9 g fiber. 
• One whole-food dinner (~450 kcal women / ~500 kcal men). 
• In men, there was an afternoon snack (~200 kcal) plus an evening protein snack (shake or bar) of 200-250 kcal. 
• Daily energy on pacing days: ~1 350–1 500 kcal for women; ~1 700–1 850 kcal for men. 
• Macro targets on pacing days: ~35% protein, ~35% carbohydrate, ~30% fat; ~20-30 g/day fiber. 

Weekly extended modified fast (once/week):
• Duration: ~36 to 60 hours of modified fasting once per week. 
• On those fast days: ~350–550 kcal/day allowed. 

CR (Heart-healthy Continuous Calorie Restriction) Arm

Overall structure (8 weeks):
• Daily calorie restriction every day for the 8-week period; no weekly extended fast. 
• The design matched weekly energy intake and physical-activity energy expenditure to the IF-P group. 

Diet composition:
• Macro targets: ~41% carbohydrate, ~38% fat, ~21% protein, consistent with U.S. “heart-healthy” dietary guidelines. 

Shared / Implementation Notes
• Testing occurred at baseline (week 0), mid-intervention (week 5) and post-intervention (week 9). 
• Both groups achieved very similar weekly total energy intake (IF-P ~9 470 ± 550 kcal/week; CR ~9 095 ± 608 kcal/week; p = 0.90) and similar physical-activity energy expenditure (IF-P ~300 ± 150 kcal/day; CR ~350 ± 200 kcal/day; p = 0.79). 
• Both groups achieved significant reductions in body weight, total fat, visceral fat, blood pressure, lipids, and self-reported hunger/desire to eat — but the IF-P group achieved greater improvements. 

Key Outcomes (for context)
• Weight loss: IF-P ~–9% vs CR ~–5%. 
• Total fat loss: IF-P –16% vs CR –9%. 
Visceral fat loss: IF-P –33% vs CR –14%.
• Increase in fat-free mass percent: IF-P +6% vs CR +3%. 

I could not find detailed sample menus with full breakdowns of protein, carbohydrate and sugar consumption published in the open-access text of the study titled Intermittent fasting and protein pacing are superior to caloric restriction for weight and visceral fat loss (Obesity (Silver Spring) 2023; 31 (Suppl 1):139-149. doi:10.1002/oby.23660). The published paper provides summary nutrition targets and overall macro percentages, but the exact menu-by-menu data is either not included in the publicly accessible version or only in supplementary/paid figures.

Below is a refined summary of what is available, followed by gaps and implications—since you’re detail-oriented, I’ll be explicit about what we know vs what we don’t.


:white_check_mark: What we have from the study Macro/energy targets

  • For the IF-P (intermittent fasting + protein pacing) arm: They specified that during the “pacing-days” (i.e., non-fast days) the macronutrient distribution was ~35 %-45 % carbohydrate, ~20 %-30 % fat, ~30 %-35 % protein.
  • For the CR (calorie restriction) arm: The macro target was ~41 % carbohydrate, ~38 % fat, ~21 % protein.
  • Daily caloric targets (non-fast days) for the IF-P group were approximately 1,350-1,500 kcal for women and ~1,700-1,850 kcal for men.
  • On the weekly fast days (once per week), the IF-P group consumed ~350-550 kcal/day during the ~36–60 h fast.
  • They reported that both groups’ weekly energy intake were matched (~9,470 ± 550 kcal/week for IF-P vs ~9,095 ± 608 kcal/week for CR) and physical activity energy expenditure similarly matched (~300 ± 150 kcal/day for IF-P vs ~350 ± 200 kcal/day for CR) so that differences would reflect diet pattern rather than energy intake or activity differences.

Some meal structure details for IF-P

  • On non-fast days, women had 4 meals/day and men 5 meals/day.
  • Two of those meals were liquid meal-replacement shakes (for breakfast and another time) ~350-400 kcal, containing ~30–36 g protein and ~9 g fibre.
  • One meal was whole-food dinner (~450-500 kcal).
  • Men had an afternoon snack (~200 kcal) and an evening protein snack (shake/bar) ~200-250 kcal.

Sugar / processed food / fibre / quality aspects

  • The authors note their dietary approach emphasised “reduced highly processed foods, sugar, and fat as well as higher fibre” in the IF-P protocol.
  • One summary commentary (Medical News Today) states that the IF-P group “reduced total fat, carbohydrate, salt, sugar, and calorie intake by ~40% from baseline” and “increased dietary fibre and protein” relative to baseline.

:warning: What we do not have (or cannot publicly access)

  • There is no publicly available breakdown in the paper of exactly how many grams of carbohydrate or sugar were consumed in each meal or snack, nor specific example menus with full macro- and sugar-gram details.
  • The published article (open access) gives macro percentages but does not provide tables of “menu day 1,” “menu day 2,” etc., with full grams of each macro and sugar.
  • We do not have information on exact timing of meals (other than number of meals) beyond the descriptions.
  • We cannot confirm from the paper whether the sugar content (added sugar vs intrinsic sugar) was separately quantified.

:dart: Proposed Sample Week Menu (Estimated)

Since the paper doesn’t provide full menu details, I’ll create a derived example (for your purposes) based on their targets. This is not from the study’s exact data, but constructed to match the macro/energy and meal-pattern guidelines. Feel free to use this as a template you can adjust later.

Assumptions

  • We’ll model for a female participant (~1,400 kcal non-fast day) in the IF-P arm.
  • Macro target: ~35% protein, 35% carbohydrate, 30% fat.
    • So for 1,400 kcal:
      • Protein: 0.35 × 1,400 = 490 kcal → ~122.5 g protein
      • Carbohydrate: 0.35 × 1,400 = 490 kcal → ~122.5 g carbohydrate
      • Fat: 0.30 × 1,400 = 420 kcal → ~46.7 g fat
  • Spread across 4 meals/day.
  • Ensure higher fibre (~25 g/day) and minimal added sugar (e.g., <10 % of total calories from added sugar; i.e., <140 kcal from added sugar → ~35 g added sugar).
  • On weekly fast day: ~400 kcal, likely mostly protein shakes + minimal carbs/fat.

Sample Menu Non-fast Day (female, ~1,400 kcal)

Meal 1 (Breakfast, ~350 kcal):

  • Protein shake: 30 g protein, 9 g fibre, ~350 kcal
    • e.g., whey-blend (30 g), berries (½ cup), spinach, almond milk
  • Estimated macros: Protein ~30 g, Carbs ~30 g (including berries/fibre), Fat ~8 g
  • Adds ~9 g fibre.

Meal 2 (Mid-morning, ~200 kcal):

  • Greek yogurt (170 g) + ½ cup sliced strawberries + 10 almonds
  • Estimated macros: Protein ~20 g, Carbs ~18 g, Fat ~9 g, Fibre ~3 g, Added sugar low (<5 g).
  • Cumulative to now: Protein ~50 g, Carbs ~48 g, Fat ~17 g, Fibre ~12 g.

Meal 3 (Dinner, ~450 kcal):

  • Grilled salmon (120 g) + quinoa (½ cup cooked) + steamed broccoli (1 cup) + 1 tsp olive oil drizzle
  • Estimated macros: Protein ~35 g, Carbs ~35 g, Fat ~15 g, Fibre ~5 g, Added sugar ~2 g.
  • Cumulative: Protein ~85 g, Carbs ~83 g, Fat ~32 g, Fibre ~17 g.

Meal 4 (Evening protein snack, ~200 kcal):

  • Protein bar or shake: ~22 g protein, ~15 g carbs, ~6 g fat, Fibre ~4 g, Added sugar ~8 g.
  • Final totals: Protein ~107 g (vs target 122 g), Carbs ~98 g (vs 122 g), Fat ~38 g (vs 46.7 g), Fibre ~21 g (close to target), Added sugar ~8 g (well under <35 g target).

Adjustments:

  • To hit full targets: Increase carb by ~24 g (e.g., add ½ banana mid-afternoon) and modestly increase protein (~15 g) via extra egg/lean meat.
  • Keep added sugar minimal (<30 g/day) to align with “reduced sugar” emphasis.

Sample Weekly Structure (IF-P Female)

  • Mon–Fri: Non-fast days as above (4 meals/day).
  • Sat: Extended modified fast day (~400 kcal): e.g., two small protein shakes (~200 kcal each) totalling ~120 g protein combined? (Well, realistically: maybe ~40 g protein each) + water + green tea; macros skew higher protein/low carb.
  • Sun: Non-fast day or choose whichever day works; return to 4 meals.

For Male Participant (~1,800 kcal non-fast day)

  • Use 5 meals/day: 2 shakes (~400 kcal each), whole-food dinner (~500 kcal), afternoon snack (~200 kcal), evening protein snack (~250 kcal).
  • Macro target: ~35% protein (~158 g), ~35% carbs (~158 g), ~30% fat (~60 g).
  • Ensure added sugar minimal (e.g., <45 g/day), fibre ~25-30 g.

I didn’t watch the video but, as I recall, Longo’s FMD reduces visceral fat, so this concept does track.

1 Like