It’d be interesting to see if Rapamycin has any effect on these measurements.
Gemini - direct access to Google AI
Created with Gemini
It’d be interesting to see if Rapamycin has any effect on these measurements.
Or we’re in luck because geroscience interventions may hit aging targets that the centenarian body is unable to fix itself
I agree we need to get lucky. Fingers crossed.
Those to do seem having a good odds of being solvable (telomerase, stem cell replacement) based on current paradigms and understanding
CoQ10 and selenium, no?
@Neo I wouldn’t count on it arriving soon. I’d guess the obstacles will be layered as deeply as human physiology. So, do what you can with what you have starting from where you are, eh ?
wouldn’t count on it arriving soon
100% on not count on soon
but don’t think we should not include scenarios of these two things having available solutions within a decade, two or three when we evaluate the future paths we may be on
“supercentenarian (those who live more than 100 years)” - wrong, 110
Video Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKAjIbAzo5E&list=LL
A video today from Dr. Michael Lustgarten and Tony Ruggia on “Maria Branyas Morera.” I found the first half to be quite valuable and the second half to be less engaging (mainly due to Tony being a little too excited and getting carried away with interrupting).
Some key points include that Maria:
There is an extensive discussion around his “hypothesis” about why Maria died in her sleep. Simply put, it had to due with her diaphragm being paralyzed during certain stages of sleep and her motor units being extremely low and giving out.
I’m not sure why this says video unavailable?
Youtube has a setting that prevents it from being “embedded” in other discussions, pages, etc. Most YouTube people don’t turn on this setting. And Mike didn’t use to, but now it appears he has. You can still just provide a link to the video, but put it on a line with other text so people have to click on it and go to Youtube to watch it.
See this discussion for More on Tony Ruggia and his theory on Motor Units: Motor Units as determinants of Aging
Like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poEP7cQBCn4
The video argues that for people who escape the major age-related killers (CVD, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s), the ultimate bottleneck to “super-longevity” may be respiratory failure driven by age-related motor neuron and motor unit loss—particularly in the diaphragm. Using supercentenarian Maria Branyas Morera (117 y) as an example, the presenter builds on a prior hypothesis (from “I Am Longevity” channel) that terminal death could result from diaphragm denervation and failure during sleep.
Mechanistically, he reviews data (mainly in rodents) showing: (1) motor units decline sharply after midlife; (2) phrenic motor neurons innervating the diaphragm are lost with age; (3) diaphragm fast-twitch fibers (type IIx/IIb) atrophy and diaphragm force production falls in old animals. In humans, he uses ALS as an extreme model of neurodegeneration where respiratory failure is the leading cause of death. ALS lifetime risk is non-trivial (~1 in 350 men, ~1 in 400 women), and its mechanisms—proteostasis disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation—overlap with hallmarks of aging.
He then centers on neurofilament light chain (NFL) as a blood biomarker of axonal injury. NFL is ~2× higher in ALS vs controls and rises with age even in “healthy” cohorts. By extrapolating regression models from studies that only go to 65–85 y, he estimates that average NFL levels in 100–135+ year-olds could reach ranges seen in ALS patients, implying substantial neurodegeneration even without a formal ALS diagnosis.
Because direct NFL testing is expensive, he proposes tracking specific ALS-associated diacylglycerides (DGs), some of which are 6–18× higher in ALS and correlate with NFL. He shows his own longitudinal metabolomics data suggesting relatively low and stable DG levels, and speculates that interventions like exercise and metabolic optimization that keep DGs low may indirectly preserve motor units and delay respiratory failure.
| Claim | Evidence given in video | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Motor units decline steeply after ~55 y, driving sarcopenia and functional loss. | Human motor unit counts in a foot muscle vs age: flat to ~55, then sharp decline toward 100 y. | Strong for age-related motor unit loss; consistent with broader neuromuscular literature. |
| 2. Phrenic motor neurons decline with age, leading to diaphragm muscle atrophy and weakness. | Rat data: fewer phrenic motor neurons in old vs young; lower diaphragm CSA and force, especially in fast fibers. | Strong (animals, translational caveats); well documented in aged rat diaphragm and phrenic MN studies. |
| 3. Respiratory failure is the main cause of death in ALS. | Cites ALS clinical data; notes respiratory failure, not CVD/cancer, is typical terminal event. | Strong; confirmed by multiple ALS cohorts and reviews. |
| 4. ALS lifetime risk ≈ 1/347 for men and 1/436 for women. | States these precise ratios without source details. | Strong (minor rounding differences); aligns with ~1/350 and ~1/400 estimates from population studies. |
| 5. NFL is about 2× higher in ALS than in controls, with ALS extremes ~110 pg/mL. | Shows a case–control NFL plot (≈20 vs ≈40 pg/mL, with outliers ≈110). | Strong directionally; magnitude and ranges are plausible, though exact values vary by assay and cohort. |
| 6. Serum NFL rises steadily with age in non-ALS populations. | Two studies plotted: increasing NFL vs age up to 65 and 85 y; median and upper-range values climb in older groups. | Strong; many independent cohorts show robust age–NFL associations. |
| 7. Extrapolating NFL-age regression suggests 100–106 y adults could have average NFL ≈40 pg/mL (ALS-like). | Uses linear regression derived from 20–65 or 20–85 y data; plugs in 104–106 y to get ≈40 pg/mL. | Speculative; regression beyond observed data is statistically fragile, and there is little direct NFL data in centenarians/supercentenarians. |
| 8. At 135–150 y, extrapolated NFL ≈110 pg/mL (ALS extreme range). | Same regression pushed far beyond observed age range. | Highly speculative/unsupported in practice; no humans live routinely at these ages, and model behavior is unknown there. |
| 9. Several DG species, especially DG(18:1/18:1), are 6–18× higher in ALS and correlate strongly with NFL. | Shows lipidomics data: seven DGs with log2 fold-change ≈2.6–4.2 and one (DG(18:1/18:1)) correlating with NFL. | Moderately strong; matches published ALS lipidomics, but findings are from relatively small cohorts and need replication. |
| 10. Lowering these DGs over time might help keep NFL low and slow neurodegeneration. | Presenter’s own longitudinal DG data and mechanistic plausibility (lipid dysregulation in ALS/aging). | Speculative; correlation ≠ causation, and no direct interventional data yet show that DG reduction lowers NFL or alters clinical outcomes. |
| 11. Neurodegeneration plus diaphragm motor unit loss will likely be the terminal bottleneck for “super-longevity” even without ALS. | Conceptual extrapolation from ALS, aging motor neuron data, and NFL age-trajectories. | Speculative but plausible; mechanism is coherent, but not empirically demonstrated in supercentenarian cohorts. |
Motor units, diaphragm, and aging
A motor unit comprises a single α-motor neuron and the muscle fibers it innervates. Aging is associated with loss of motor neurons, collateral reinnervation, and eventual failure of that compensatory process, yielding fewer and larger, then fewer and dysfunctional, motor units.
The diaphragm is a mixed-fiber skeletal muscle with slow (type I) and fast (type IIa/IIx/IIb) fibers, innervated by phrenic motor neurons in cervical spinal cord segments C3–C5. Rodent studies show:
ALS as an accelerated model
ALS involves progressive degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons, leading to paralysis of limb, bulbar, and respiratory muscles. Respiratory failure due to diaphragm and accessory muscle weakness is the predominant cause of death.
Mechanistically, ALS shows:
which overlap with canonical hallmarks of aging and neurodegeneration more broadly.
Neurofilament light chain (NFL)
NFL is a structural component of large myelinated axons; injury triggers its release into CSF and then blood. Elevated serum/CSF NFL is now a pan-neurodegenerative marker, prognostic in ALS, Alzheimer’s, MS, and others.
Normative studies show:
The video’s key move is linear extrapolation of age–NFL regressions from data fit only up to 65–85 y out to 100–150 y. Statistically, this assumes a stable linear slope well beyond observed data, which is rarely guaranteed—particularly if survival bias and competing risks alter the population at extreme ages. That’s why those specific numbers (e.g., “40 pg/mL at 104–106 y”) should be treated as illustrative rather than as hard forecasts.
Lipidomics and DG(18:1/18:1)
High-resolution lipidomics in ALS has identified alterations in multiple lipid classes, including diacylglycerols (DGs). The cited work reports:
The mechanism is unclear: DG accumulation may reflect altered membrane turnover, impaired mitochondrial β-oxidation, or generic metabolic stress. It is not yet known whether lowering these DG species causally reduces NFL or slows neurodegeneration.
Overall, the mechanistic framing—motor unit loss, diaphragm vulnerability, ALS as a model, NFL as an axonal injury biomarker, and lipid dysregulation as a correlated feature—is well grounded. The main weak points are the aggressive age extrapolations for NFL and the implied causal link between specific DG reductions and neuroprotection, which remain unproven and should be treated as hypotheses rather than established longevity strategies.
respiratory failure driven by age-related motor neuron and motor unit loss—particularly in the diaphragm
This drives me into another effort to understand if there are things we can do to counter this issue, as it does seem to have some supporting literature.
From Google Gemini (ChatGPT keeps giving me wrong citations and bad links, Google is better).
Here is the fully corrected text, with all claims verified against published literature and the correct URLs/DOIs embedded directly into the citations.
The core premise—that age-related motor neuron and motor unit loss, particularly in the diaphragm, drives respiratory failure—is supported by neuromuscular physiology. The interventions below are mechanistically plausible and supported by published evidence.
IMST is a form of resistance training for the inspiratory muscles (primarily the diaphragm and intercostals).
What it does:
Key studies:
(High-volume, low-resistance breathing, often associated with SpiroTiger devices)
Effect:
Key references:
(A powerful respiratory neuroplasticity stimulus)
Effect:
Key studies:
This integrated plan uses the high-efficacy, low-time-commitment activities identified in the literature (Tier 1 & 2) to preserve both diaphragm motor units and limb fast motor units (FMUs).
| Component | Goal | Frequency | Duration / Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Power Lungs (IMST) | Strength & Fast MU Preservation | 5 Days/Week | 30 breaths (2 sets of 15) at 75% of maximum pressure. |
| 2. Loaded Bellows | Neural-Postural Integration | 2 Days/Week (During lifting) | 3 sets of Farmer Carries or Rack Holds for 60 seconds, focusing on deep nasal diaphragm breaths. |
| 3. Endurance Drive (NHT) | Endurance & Metabolic Health | 2 Days/Week (During cardio) | 30–45 mins of Zone 2 cardio, attempting to maintain nasal-only breathing to slightly increase respiratory load. |
| 4. Vocal Gym | Coordination & Eccentric Control | Daily | 2-3 mins of loud, sustained vocalization (singing, long humming notes, deep chanting). |
A concise guide on how to safely determine your 75% max pressure for the IMST portion** of the routine (See link below):
Created with Gemini
I wonder if respiratory training, using devices like this, would be helpful in this area (and a way to test and track progress)? I’m thinking specifically for my father, who can’t do much in the way of HIIT, etc.
Simple and effective.Airofit Active is a simplified version of our Airofit PRO breathing trainer.If you want to improve your health, overall well-being, and physical performance through guided fundamental breathing exercises, Airofit Active is the...
Price: EUR 129
and
Respiratory muscles exerciser SPIROTIGER
https://www.medicalexpo.com/prod/italia-medica/product-83590-1044651.html
I’d guess breakdown of her extracellular matrix (ECM) might have also led to her death, and maybe even affected motor unit disintegration (she looked old). It could also be the case that motor unit health directly affects ECM health – maybe the little subtle muscles in the body (e.g. arrector pili) keep parts of ECM healthy.
Interesting points… I wonder if there are some good ways to track and measure ECM health throughout the body? I also wonder what the physical manisfestations of poor ECM are? The symptomology? So:
Below is a concise, direct, academically structured overview of the physiological symptoms and health issues that emerge as the extracellular matrix (ECM) degrades with aging. Emphasis is on mechanistic clarity, tissue specificity, and actionable interpretation for longevity and healthspan.
Aging ECM shows reductions in collagen I/III crosslinking quality, elastin fragmentation, glycation (AGEs), and disorganized fibrils. This shifts load from ECM → cells, producing mechanical failure.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: impaired LOX/LOXL crosslinking; elastin fragmentation (tropoelastin deficit); MMP-1/3/9 upregulation; end-loops of fragmented elastin creating inflammatory microdomains.
Arteries rely heavily on elastin, collagen IV, proteoglycans, and basement-membrane integrity.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: elastin fragmentation, vascular smooth muscle phenotypic switching, excessive collagen deposition → fibrosis, proteoglycan loss.
ECM in cartilage ≈ collagen II + aggrecan + hyaluronic acid.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: aggrecanase (ADAMTS5) activity; MMP-13 upregulation; reduced proteoglycan sulfation; oxidative damage.
Bone matrix = mineralized collagen I + proteoglycans.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: AGE crosslinks reduce collagen toughness; impaired osteoblast ECM deposition; excessive RANKL-mediated remodeling.
Skeletal muscle relies on ECM sheaths (endomysium/perimysium) for force transmission and satellite-cell niche integrity.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: TGF-β/SMAD fibrosis programs; increased collagen VI stiffness; disruption of laminin α2 and integrin α7 signaling.
Lung ECM = elastin-rich alveoli + collagen IV basement membranes.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: elastin fiber fragmentation, impaired tropoelastin turnover, fibroblast senescence.
Aging shifts ECM homeostasis toward pathological deposition rather than loss in some organs.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: senescent stellate cells; collagen I/III expansion; loss of laminin network in glomerular basement membrane.
Neural ECM regulates synaptic stability, plasticity windows, and detoxification.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: degradation of perineuronal nets (CSPGs, hyaluronan, tenascin-R); MMP-9 upregulation; basement-membrane thinning.
The skin is the most visible ECM aging organ.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: UV-induced MMP-1 activation; collagen fragmentation; elastosis; reduced fibroblast mechanosensitivity.
Fragmented collagen, elastin peptides (“matrikines”), and hyaluronan fragments act as inflammatory danger signals.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: TLR2/4 activation; cGAS–STING autoinflammatory response to ECM debris; chronic macrophage infiltration.
Nearly all adult stem-cell niches depend on ECM architecture.
Symptoms / issues:
Mechanistic drivers: altered stiffness, degraded laminins, integrin signaling drift, altered YAP/TAZ mechanotransduction.
Aging ECM failure manifests through two broad modes:
Both feed systemic aging through chronic inflammation, impaired mechanotransduction, stem-cell dysfunction, vascular stiffness, and weakened barrier functions .
Motor unit health and ECM health are inseparable; ECM aging directly drives motor-unit degeneration, and motor-unit dysfunction accelerates ECM disorganization—forming a vicious cycle that amplifies sarcopenia, power loss, and neuromuscular frailty.
Full response here:

Shared via ChatGPT
Which leads to the question:
Response:

Shared via ChatGPT
I had trouble viewing it. Here is Gemini 3 Pro’s version:
Created with Gemini
One small point in all that: I didn’t realize bamboo had such high levels of silica. Bamboo shoots – probably even just canned bamboo shoots – probably contains a lot. Just a few grams of bamboo shoots is all one would need each day.
I also didn’t realize that isometric holds were a good exercise for fascia and tendons.
It’s interesting… each AI system has different biases, limits and approaches (and perhaps each are customized differently based on the information I’ve fed to each of them since I started using them). They also have different answers each time I re-run the query. The suggestions made by CGPT are quite different than the Gemini suggestions:
Here is the CGPT summary:
This is the most evidence-based integrated approach:
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_6c0ec5d4-c49d-45be-a3d8-a8f5ffb1fe71
https://claude.ai/share/b445ca78-5425-4577-95bc-b314b7631a3c
Gemini 3 Pro’s version:
Your Gemini response mentioned:
There is some evidence that carnosine (a dipeptide supplement) can inhibit AGE formation.
So I asked CGPT: “Can you identify and summarize all that evidence?”
Short answer: there is substantial mechanistic, in-vitro, and animal evidence that carnosine inhibits AGE formation; human data are suggestive but still thin and heterogeneous.
Below is a structured map of the evidence rather than a random paper list.

Shared via ChatGPT
I didn’t realize bamboo had such high levels of silica. Bamboo shoots – probably even just canned bamboo shoots – probably contains a lot. Just a few grams of bamboo shoots is all one would need each day.
It wasn’t clear in the first response on the amounts of either hyaluronic acid or silica, so I asked Gemini to elaborate further:
| Ingredient | Role in ECM | Validated Daily Dose Range | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| G - Glycine | Building Block(Precursor for Collagen) | 3,000 – 5,000 mg(3–5 grams) | This high dose compensates for the body’s limited ability to produce enough glycine for optimal collagen synthesis. |
| H - Hyaluronic Acid | Hydration & Lubrication(Signaling Molecule) | 120 – 300 mg | Look for products with low-to-medium molecular weight HA, as it has better oral bioavailability and signaling capacity for internal tissues. |
| S - Silica | The Cross-Linker(Essential Co-factor for Collagen) | 10 – 40 mg(Elemental Silicon) | This is the elemental Silicon content, not the weight of the extract. Aim for Bamboo Extract standardized to a high percentage of silica (often found in capsules labeled as 200mg of extract yielding 10-40mg of elemental silica). |
If you are looking to specifically target internal connective tissue (like fascia and tendons), combining these dosages with the resistance training and anti-glycation diet mentioned previously will create the most scientifically comprehensive approach.
and from CGPT:
If you were hoping to use canned bamboo shoots as a reliable dietary source of silica to support connective tissue, skin, bone, etc., you should remain skeptical: while bamboo shoots (fresh) do contain some measurable silicon, there is no robust data confirming how much silica survives through canning, or how bioavailable it is when you eat it.
If silica intake is a priority for you, relying on “bamboo-shoot as food” seems too uncertain. Instead, if you’re considering silica supplementation (for skin, bone, connective tissue), a dedicated bamboo-derived silica extract might be a more controllable alternative — though even then, absorption/bioavailability data should be verified.
Full response: ChatGPT - Silica levels in bamboo shoots
and there are lots of bamboo shoot silica extract products out there (who knew?)